确保只有'last-in'线程可以访问互斥锁/锁定区域而中间线程没有获得锁定的正确方法是什么?
示例序列:
A acquires lock
B waits
C waits
B fails to acquire lock*
A releases lock
C acquires lock
* B应该无法通过异常获取锁定(如SemaphoreSlim.Wait(CancellationToken)
或布尔Monitor.TryEnter()
类型构造。
我可以想到几个类似的方案来实现这一点(例如使用CancellationTokenSource
和SemaphoreSlim
),但它们似乎都不是特别优雅。
这种情况是否有常见做法?
答案 0 :(得分:2)
这应该像您想要的那样工作,它使用大小为1的SemaphoreSlim来控制它。我还添加了对传递CancelationToken以取消等待锁定的支持,它还支持WaitAsync
返回任务而不是阻止。
public sealed class LastInLocker : IDisposable
{
private readonly SemaphoreSlim _semaphore = new SemaphoreSlim(1);
private CancellationTokenSource _cts = new CancellationTokenSource();
private bool _disposed = false;
public void Wait()
{
Wait(CancellationToken.None);
}
public void Wait(CancellationToken earlyCancellationToken)
{
if(_disposed)
throw new ObjectDisposedException("LastInLocker");
var token = ReplaceTokenSource(earlyCancellationToken);
_semaphore.Wait(token);
}
public Task WaitAsync()
{
return WaitAsync(CancellationToken.None);
}
public async Task WaitAsync(CancellationToken earlyCancellationToken)
{
if (_disposed)
throw new ObjectDisposedException("LastInLocker");
var token = ReplaceTokenSource(earlyCancellationToken);
//I await here because if ReplaceTokenSource thows a exception I want the
//observing of that exception to be deferred until the caller awaits my
//returned task.
await _semaphore.WaitAsync(token).ConfigureAwait(false);
}
public void Release()
{
if (_disposed)
throw new ObjectDisposedException("LastInLocker");
_semaphore.Release();
}
private CancellationToken ReplaceTokenSource(CancellationToken earlyCancellationToken)
{
var newSource = CancellationTokenSource.CreateLinkedTokenSource(earlyCancellationToken);
var oldSource = Interlocked.Exchange(ref _cts, newSource);
oldSource.Cancel();
oldSource.Dispose();
return newSource.Token;
}
public void Dispose()
{
_disposed = true;
_semaphore.Dispose();
_cts.Dispose();
}
}
这是一个重新创建测试示例的小测试程序
internal class Program
{
static LastInLocker locker = new LastInLocker();
private static void Main(string[] args)
{
Task.Run(() => Test("A"));
Thread.Sleep(500);
Task.Run(() => Test("B"));
Thread.Sleep(500);
Task.Run(() => Test("C"));
Console.ReadLine();
}
private static void Test(string name)
{
Console.WriteLine("{0} waits for lock", name);
try
{
locker.Wait();
Console.WriteLine("{0} acquires lock", name);
Thread.Sleep(4000);
locker.Release();
Console.WriteLine("{0} releases lock", name);
}
catch (Exception)
{
Console.WriteLine("{0} fails to acquire lock", name);
}
}
}
输出
A waits for lock A acquires lock B waits for lock C waits for lock B fails to acquire lock A releases lock C acquires lock C releases lock
答案 1 :(得分:0)
试试这个:
public interface ILocker
{
bool GetLock();
void Release();
}
class Locker : ILocker
{
private long m_NumberOfTimeGetLockWasCalled = 0;
private readonly object m_LockingObject = new object();
private readonly object m_LockingObject2 = new object();
public bool GetLock()
{
long lock_count = 0;
var lock_was_taken = false;
lock(m_LockingObject)
{
lock_count = m_NumberOfTimeGetLockWasCalled++;
lock_was_taken = Monitor.TryEnter(m_LockingObject2);
if (lock_was_taken)
return true;
}
while(!lock_was_taken)
{
Thread.Sleep(5);
lock(m_LockingObject)
{
if (lock_count != m_NumberOfTimeGetLockWasCalled)
return false;
lock_was_taken = Monitor.TryEnter(m_LockingObject2);
if (lock_was_taken)
break;
}
}
return true;
}
public void Release()
{
Monitor.Exit(m_LockingObject2);
}
}