我一直在使用具有正确名称间距的JavaScript模块模式。所以基本上我声明了名称空间,每个名称空间都有一些封装在其中的模块。这是我到目前为止所写的内容。代码已被正确评论。
// namespace has been defined somewhere not to worry that it will be undefined
if (NAMESPACE == null || typeof (NAMESPACE) == 'undefined') {
NAMESPACE = {};
var id = function (id) {
var _all_ids = {};
var persona = {};
var _id = id; // _id is a local variable that stores the argument
var getId = function () { //this function returns the local private variable
return _id;
}
persona.getId = getId;
var _closed = false;
var close = function () {
delete _all_ids[getId()];
this._closed = true;
}
persona.close = close;
return persona; // persona is an object that has two properties `getId` and `close`. Both these are functiona
}
NAMESPACE['id'] = id; // so basically this will become NAMESPACE.id.getId or NAMESPACE.id.close
}
我已经完全评论了tis代码,任何人都可以理解。它声明了一个简单的命名空间,然后在其中添加一个模块。该模块当然是使用封装。
我的一位教师建议此代码有一个基本的缺陷标准或其他。虽然代码运行良好,但我无法解决这个问题。
标准明智吗?或者我完全错了吗?
答案 0 :(得分:1)
我已经扩展了一些示例来展示原则。
// NAMESPACE with install/define method, like when using require.js
var NAMESPACE = (function ( doc, win ) {
var _modules = {};
return {
'install' : function ( name, definition ) {
if (!_modules.hasOwnProperty(name)) {
_modules[name] = definition;
this[name] = _modules[name];
}
else throw new Error('Module ' + name + ' is already installed.');
}
};
}( document, window ));
// Your actual module to use in the NAMESPACE
NAMESPACE.install('id', (function ( id ) {
var _all_ids = {},
_id = id,
_closed = false;
return {
'getID' : function () {
return _id;
},
'close' : function () {
delete _all_ids[_id];
_closed = true;
}
};
}( 'someDefaultID' )));
// NAMESPACE as an object we pass around
var NAMESPACE = {};
(function ( NAMESPACE ) {
var id,
NAMESPACE = NAMESPACE;
if (NAMESPACE == null || typeof (NAMESPACE) == 'undefined') {
NAMESPACE = {};
window.NAMESPACE = NAMESPACE;
}
id = (function ( id ) {
var _all_ids = {},
_id = id,
_closed = false;
return {
'getID' : function () {
return _id;
},
'close' : function () {
delete _all_ids[_id];
_closed = true;
}
};
}( 'someDefaultID' ));
NAMESPACE['id'] = id;
}( window.NAMESPACE ))
答案 1 :(得分:0)
为什么不将函数放在命名空间中?
NAMESPACE = {
id: function (id) {
// The id function in here
}
}
答案 2 :(得分:0)
命名空间的目的是避免污染全局范围。在您的代码中,
if (NAMESPACE == null || typeof (NAMESPACE) == 'undefined') {
NAMESPACE = {};
var id = function (id) {
// ...
}
NAMESPACE['id'] = id; // so basically this will become NAMESPACE.id.getId or NAMESPACE.id.close
}
id
现在在全局范围和命名空间中定义。这违背了使用命名空间的目的。
实现定义命名空间而不污染全局范围的相同目标的简单JS方法是重新排列
if (NAMESPACE == null || typeof (NAMESPACE) == 'undefined') {
NAMESPACE = {};
NAMESPACE['id'] = function (id) {
// ...
}
}
或
if (NAMESPACE == null || typeof (NAMESPACE) == 'undefined') {
NAMESPACE = {
id: function (id) {
// ...
}
}
正如@Lekoaf建议的那样。
然而,避免全球污染的现代方法是简单地将所有代码包含在IIFE中。虽然有不止一种方法将您的代码封装在IIFE中,但最简单的方法是将其放入原来的
(function(){ // Beginning of IIFE
if (NAMESPACE == null || typeof (NAMESPACE) == 'undefined') {
NAMESPACE = {};
var id = function (id) {
var _all_ids = {};
var persona = {};
var _id = id; // _id is a local variable that stores the argument
var getId = function () { //this function returns the local private variable
return _id;
}
persona.getId = getId;
var _closed = false;
var close = function () {
delete _all_ids[getId()];
this._closed = true;
}
persona.close = close;
return persona; // persona is an object that has two properties `getId` and `close`. Both these are functiona
}
NAMESPACE['id'] = id; // so basically this will become NAMESPACE.id.getId or NAMESPACE.id.close
}
})(); // End of IIFE
答案 3 :(得分:0)
您可以使用扩充模块模式,以避免覆盖全局模块及其方法。
//fooModule does not exist, so it is defined as an empty object
var fooModule = (function(app, name, definition) {
if (!app[name]) app[name] = definition;
else throw new Error("this method has already been defined");
return app;
})(fooModule || {}, "foobar", function() {
console.log("foobar");
});
//fooModule now exists, so we use the pre-existing object instead of an empty one
var fooModule = (function(app, name, defintion) {
if (!app[name]) app[namepace] = definition;
else throw new Error("this method has already been defined");
return app;
})(fooModule || {}, "barfoo", function() {
console.log("barfoo");
});
//throws an error because barfoo has already been set to fooModule
var fooModule = (function(app, name, defintion) {
if (!app[name]) app[namepace] = definition;
else throw new Error("this method has already been defined");
return app;
})(fooModule || {}, "barfoo", function() {
console.log("should throw error");
});
fooModule.foobar(); //"foobar"
fooModule.barfoo(); //"barfoo"
重要的部分是myModule || {}
。如果模块存在,请使用它,如果它没有,则创建模块。
这仅解决全局对象上的方法。你看过this article了吗?我可能读过最好的模块模式。