我正在尝试优化代码中的反射利用率,我很想知道 是否可以一次设置对象的多个属性:
样本用法:
private void SetProperties<T>(List<T> objects, List<Tuple<string, object>> propsAndValues) where T:Task
{
Type type = typeof(T);
var propInfos = propsAndValues.ToDictionary(key => type.GetProperty(key.Item1, BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Static | BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.SetProperty), elem => elem.Item2);
objects.AsParallel().ForAll(obj =>
{
obj.SetProps(propInfos);
});
}
其中
public static void SetProps<T>(this T obj, Dictionary<PropertyInfo, object> propInfos) where T : Task
{
foreach (var propInfo in propInfos)
{
propInfo.Key.SetValue(obj, propInfo.Value, null);
}
}
我希望SetProps扩展方法被更高效的东西取代,但还没有找到合适的东西。 在此先感谢;)
我已使用评论中提供的链接修改了代码。常规方式仍然快4倍。问题是这是限制还是有改进的余地?
class DelegateFactory
{
public delegate void LateBoundPropertySet(object target, object value);
public delegate void LateBoundPropertyListSet(object target, List<object> values);
public static LateBoundPropertySet CreateSetIL(PropertyInfo property)
{
var method = new DynamicMethod("Set" + property.Name, null, new[] { typeof(object), typeof(object) }, true);
var gen = method.GetILGenerator();
var sourceType = property.DeclaringType;
var setter = property.GetSetMethod(true);
gen.Emit(OpCodes.Ldarg_0); // Load input to stack
gen.Emit(OpCodes.Castclass, sourceType); // Cast to source type
gen.Emit(OpCodes.Ldarg_1); // Load value to stack
gen.Emit(OpCodes.Unbox_Any, property.PropertyType); // Unbox the value to its proper value type
gen.Emit(OpCodes.Callvirt, setter); // Call the setter method
gen.Emit(OpCodes.Ret);
var result = (LateBoundPropertySet)method.CreateDelegate(typeof(LateBoundPropertySet));
return result;
}
public static LateBoundPropertySet CreateSet(PropertyInfo property)
{
var setterType = typeof(Action<,>).MakeGenericType(property.DeclaringType, property.PropertyType);
var propertyWriter = typeof(PropertyWriter<,>).MakeGenericType(property.DeclaringType, property.PropertyType);
var setterDelegate = Delegate.CreateDelegate(setterType, property.GetSetMethod());
var writer = (IPropertyWriter)Activator.CreateInstance(propertyWriter, setterDelegate);
return writer.SetValue;
}
private interface IPropertyWriter
{
void SetValue(object instance, object value);
}
private interface IPropertyListWriter
{
void SetValues(object instance, List<object> values);
}
private class PropertyWriter<TInstance, TProperty> : IPropertyWriter
{
private readonly Action<TInstance, TProperty> _setValueDelegate;
public PropertyWriter(Action<TInstance, TProperty> setValueDelegate)
{
_setValueDelegate = setValueDelegate;
}
public void SetValue(object instance, object value)
{
_setValueDelegate((TInstance)instance, (TProperty)value);
}
}
}
public static void SetProps2<T>(this T obj, Dictionary<DelegateFactory.LateBoundPropertySet, object> propSetters) where T : Task
{
foreach (var propSet in propSetters)
{
propSet.Key.Invoke(propSet, propSet.Value);
}
}
答案 0 :(得分:4)
如果你正在做足够的反思,这是真正的瓶颈,那么动态代码可能值得研究。在此之前 - 也许HyperDescriptor
会降低成本;非常相似的代码,但便宜得多。
在.NET 4.0及更高版本中,Expression
API允许您设置多个属性,但这只有在缓存委托时才真正可行。另一个有趣的选项(具有相同的约束:您必须缓存并重新使用该委托)是DynamicMethod
。但是,所有这些选项都是相当高级的主题。我很乐意提供建议,但你真的需要这个吗?
答案 1 :(得分:1)
正如Marc已经告诉过你的那样,最好使用动态代码来提高性能。
您可以使用GetSetMethod选择DynamicMethod方法或Delegate.CreateDelegate。
对于DynamicMethod,您可以在此处查看示例:Late-Bound Invocations with DynamicMethod 至于CreateDelegate,请看一下这个问题:CreateDelegate with unknown types