这是我的控制器(索引已排序):
def index
if params[:limit]
@bisacs = Bisac.order(:bisac_code).page(params[:page]).per(params[:limit])
else
@bisacs = Bisac.order(:bisac_code).page(params[:page])
end
end
以下是执行的查询(在我看来太多,太慢,第一页为6-7秒或导航到下一个/最后一个:
Started GET "/bisacs" for 127.0.0.1 at 2015-08-11 13:16:33 -0400
Processing by BisacsController#index as HTML
Rendered home/_main_links.html.erb (0.2ms)
CYPHER 358ms MATCH (result_bisac:`Bisac`) RETURN count(result_bisac) AS result_bisac
CYPHER 389ms MATCH (result_bisac:`Bisac`) RETURN result_bisac ORDER BY result_bisac.bisac_code SKIP {skip_0} LIMIT {limit_25} | {:skip_0=>0, :limit_25=>25}
CYPHER 119ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24319299}
CYPHER 118ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24319299}
CYPHER 118ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24320808}
CYPHER 118ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24320808}
CYPHER 120ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24319262}
CYPHER 118ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24319262}
CYPHER 118ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24320349}
CYPHER 120ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24320349}
CYPHER 120ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24318456}
CYPHER 119ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24318456}
CYPHER 119ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24320054}
CYPHER 116ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24320054}
CYPHER 119ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24321703}
CYPHER 119ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24321703}
CYPHER 118ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24319503}
CYPHER 117ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24319503}
CYPHER 118ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24321755}
CYPHER 118ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24321755}
CYPHER 116ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24319313}
CYPHER 118ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24319313}
CYPHER 118ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24321376}
CYPHER 119ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24321376}
CYPHER 119ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24321021}
CYPHER 118ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24321021}
CYPHER 123ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24319280}
CYPHER 119ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24319280}
CYPHER 118ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24318845}
CYPHER 118ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24318845}
CYPHER 122ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24320822}
CYPHER 119ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24320822}
CYPHER 118ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24318841}
CYPHER 118ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24318841}
CYPHER 119ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24321956}
CYPHER 117ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24321956}
CYPHER 118ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24319031}
CYPHER 119ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24319031}
CYPHER 118ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24320070}
CYPHER 118ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24320070}
CYPHER 118ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24322195}
CYPHER 116ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24322195}
CYPHER 118ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24319124}
CYPHER 118ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24319124}
CYPHER 119ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24322258}
CYPHER 118ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24322258}
CYPHER 118ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24318767}
CYPHER 121ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24318767}
CYPHER 118ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24320583}
CYPHER 118ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24320583}
CYPHER 118ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24319086}
CYPHER 117ms MATCH n WHERE (ID(n) = {ID_n}) WITH n RETURN ID(n) | {:ID_n=>24319086}
Rendered bisacs/index.html.erb within layouts/application (6722.1ms)
Completed 200 OK in 7096ms (Views: 7095.5ms)
如何改进?为什么要逐个获取这25个节点?
要在Neo4j控制台中检索所有3983个代码,只需1秒钟左右:
MATCH (result_bisac:`Bisac`) RETURN result_bisac ORDER BY result_bisac.bisac_code;
Returned 3983 rows in 1064 ms, displaying first 1000 rows.
答案 0 :(得分:3)
嗯,好的,所以这是另一个有点令人尴尬的答案;)
如果您将以下内容放入配置中(config/environments/development.rb
或config/application.rb
),则应修复此问题:
config.neo4j._active_record_destroyed_behavior = true
Explination:gem实现ActiveNode#exists?
方法与ActiveRecord#exists?
方法略有不同。在ActiveRecord中,它只是检查对象是否在内存中的某个点被破坏。在ActiveNode中,我们正在检查实际的数据库(也许我们在某些时候需要查询缓存)。
所以,长话短说,我们不想立即引入这个更改,因为它是一个重大变化,所以我输入了一个配置变量,现在修复它。版本6.0中不需要配置变量
答案 1 :(得分:0)
我评论了视图中标签中的以下前3行,速度变得可以接受,大约一秒钟:
<% @bisacs.each do |bisac| %>
<tr>
<td><%#= link_to 'Show', bisac %></td>
<td><%#= link_to 'Edit', edit_bisac_path(bisac) %></td>
<td><%#= link_to 'Destroy', bisac, method: :delete, data: { confirm: 'Are you sure?' } %></td>
<td><%= bisac.bisac_code%></td>
<td><%= bisac.bisac_value%></td>
</tr>
<% end %>
然而,将链接添加回“show”会使页面渲染速度再次变慢:
<% @bisacs.each do |bisac| %>
<tr>
<td><%= link_to bisac.bisac_code, bisac%></td>
<td><%= bisac.bisac_value%></td>
</tr>
<% end %>