我有这个方法
Benchmark.bm do |b|
b.report('joined') do
1000.times do
ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute('
select
p.id,
(select count(c.id) from comments c where c.post_id = p.id) comment_count
from
posts l;')
end
end
b.report('nested') do
1000.times do
ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute('
select
p.id,
count(c.id) comment_count
from
posts File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), *%w[rel path here])
left join comments c on
c.post_id = p.id
group by
p.id;')
end
end
end
user system total real
nested 2.120000 0.900000 3.020000 ( 3.349015)
joined 2.110000 0.990000 3.100000 ( 3.402986)
哪个工作但由于某种原因不返回specfici命令的错误输出
def do_sh_shell_command(string_command, env_variables=None):
cmd = shlex.split(string_command)
try:
p = subprocess.check_output(string_command, shell=True,
env=env_variables) # shell=True means sh shell used
except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
print 'Error running command: ' + '"' + e.cmd + '"' + ' see above shell error'
print 'Return code: ' + str(e.returncode)
return e.returncode, e.cmd
return 0, p
输出:
def hold_ajf_job(job_order_id):
#print 'ctmpsm -UPDATEAJF ' + job_order_id + ' HOLD'
return do_sh_shell_command('ctmpsm -UPDATEAJF ' + job_order_id + ' HOLD')
hold_ajf_job('0e4ba')
do_sh_shell_command('lsl')
当我运行命令ctmpsm -UPDATEAJF 0e4ba HOLD刚刚形成普通shell我得到以下错误输出
ctmpsm -UPDATEAJF 0e4ba HOLD
Error running command: "ctmpsm -UPDATEAJF 0e4ba HOLD" see above shell error
Return code: 1
/bin/sh: lsl: not found
Error running command: "lsl" see above shell error
Return code: 127
这与我的python代码中无用的错误输出不同,我不能为我的生活找出原因?
更新:
尝试stderr = subprocess.STDOUT
ctmtest1-tctmsv80 [288] ctmpsm -UPDATEAJF 0e4ba HOLD
Failed to Hold Orderno 0000e4ba. (rc=JOBSTATINCM).
输出:
def do_sh_shell_command(string_command, env_variables=None):
cmd = shlex.split(string_command)
try:
p = subprocess.check_output(string_command, stderr=subprocess.STDOUT, shell=True,
env=env_variables) # shell=True means sh shell used
except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
print 'Error running command: ' + '"' + e.cmd + '"' + ' see above shell error'
print 'Return code: ' + str(e.returncode)
return e.returncode, e.cmd
return 0, p
现在错误已经完全消失了?
答案 0 :(得分:5)
作为documented,当check_output
引发异常时,它会将命令的输出放在异常对象的output
属性中。您可以执行以下操作:
try:
p = subprocess.check_output(string_command, stderr=subprocess.STDOUT,
shell=True, env=env_variables)
except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
print e.output
print 'Error running command: ' + '"' + e.cmd + '"' + ' see above shell error'
print 'Return code: ' + str(e.returncode)
return e.returncode, e.cmd
return 0, p
答案 1 :(得分:0)
通过指定stderr=subprocess.STDOUT
,可以将写入标准错误的输出重定向到标准输出。
p = subprocess.check_output(
string_command,
shell=True,
stderr=subprocess.STDOUT,
env=env_variables)