Java:CharBuffer“忽略”数组偏移量?

时间:2010-06-21 15:45:06

标签: java arrays buffer nio

请帮助我理解以下内容:

我使用创建CharBuffer CharBuffer.wrapped(new char[12], 2, 10)(数组,偏移量,长度)
所以我希望访问数组的偏移量为2,总(余数)长度为10。但arrayOffset()会返回0

我想要了解(并且无法从JavaDoc中找到)是:

    {li>

    arrayOffset()不是0

  • 是否有可能让CharBuffer使用具有“实际”偏移量的数组(以便在该偏移量之前永远不会访问该数组)?

这是一个小测试案例:

import java.nio.*;
import java.util.*;
import org.junit.*;

public class _CharBufferTests {

  public _CharBufferTests() {
  }

  private static void printBufferInfo(CharBuffer b) {
    System.out.println("- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -");
    System.out.println("capacity: " + b.capacity());
    System.out.println("length: " + b.length());
    System.out.println("arrayOffset: " + b.arrayOffset());
    System.out.println("limit: " + b.limit());
    System.out.println("position: " + b.position());
    System.out.println("remaining: " + b.remaining());
    System.out.print("content from array: ");

    char[] array = b.array();
    for (int i = 0; i < array.length; ++i) {
        if (array[i] == 0) {
            array[i] = '_';
        }
    }

    System.out.println(Arrays.toString(b.array()));
  }

  @Test
  public void testCharBuffer3() {
    CharBuffer b = CharBuffer.wrap(new char[12], 2, 10);
    printBufferInfo(b);
    b.put("abc");
    printBufferInfo(b);
    b.rewind();
    b.put("abcd");
    printBufferInfo(b);
  }

}

输出:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
capacity: 12
length: 10
arrayOffset: 0
limit: 12
position: 2
remaining: 10
content from array: [_, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
capacity: 12
length: 7
arrayOffset: 0
limit: 12
position: 5
remaining: 7
content from array: [_, _, a, b, c, _, _, _, _, _, _, _]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
capacity: 12
length: 8
arrayOffset: 0
limit: 12
position: 4
remaining: 8
content from array: [a, b, c, d, c, _, _, _, _, _, _, _]

谢谢!

2 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:1)

CharBuffer.wrap(char[], int, int)

  

它的后备数组将是给定的数组,它的数组偏移量将为零。

检查对CharBuffer.offset的写入看起来像HeapCharBuffer和StringCharBuffer都可以有非零的arrayOffsets()。

答案 1 :(得分:1)

我认为你可以使用position来达到类似的效果。不要使用rewind,因为这会将position设置为0;请改用reset