以下代码:
Observable
.just(0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
.doOnNext(item -> System.out.println("source emitting " + item))
.groupBy(item -> {
System.out.println("groupBy called for " + item);
return item % 3;
})
.subscribe(observable -> {
System.out.println("got observable " + observable + " for key " + observable.getKey());
observable.subscribe(item -> {
System.out.println("key " + observable.getKey() + ", item " + item);
});
});
让我感到困惑。我得到的输出是:
source emitting 0
groupBy called for 0
got observable rx.observables.GroupedObservable@42110406 for key 0
key 0, item 0
source emitting 1
groupBy called for 1
got observable rx.observables.GroupedObservable@1698c449 for key 1
key 1, item 1
source emitting 2
groupBy called for 2
got observable rx.observables.GroupedObservable@5ef04b5 for key 2
key 2, item 2
source emitting 3
groupBy called for 3
key 0, item 3
source emitting 4
groupBy called for 4
key 1, item 4
source emitting 5
groupBy called for 5
key 2, item 5
source emitting 6
groupBy called for 6
key 0, item 6
source emitting 7
groupBy called for 7
key 1, item 7
source emitting 8
groupBy called for 8
key 2, item 8
source emitting 9
groupBy called for 9
key 0, item 9
因此,在顶级订阅方法中,我按预期从GroupedObservable获得3个可观察对象。然后,我一个接一个地订阅分组的观察者 - 这里是我不理解的东西:
为什么原始项目仍以原始序列(即0,1,2,3 ......)发出,而不是0,3,6,9 ......用于键0,然后是1,4,密钥1为7,密钥2为2,5,8,
我想我理解这些小组是如何创建的:
1. 0 is emitted, the key function is called and it gets 0
2. it is checked if an observable for 0 exists, it doesn't, so a new one is created and emitted, and then it emits 0
3. the same happens for source items 1 and 2 as they both create new groups, and observables with key 1 and 2 are emitted, and they emit 1 and 2 correspondingly
4. source item 3 is emitted, the key function is called and it gets 0
5. it is checked if an observable for 0 exists, it does -> no new grouped observable is created nor emitted, but 3 is emitted by the already existing observable
6. etc. until the source sequence is drained
似乎虽然我逐个获得了分组的可观测量,但它们的排放在某种程度上是交错的。这是怎么发生的?
答案 0 :(得分:4)
为什么原始项目仍以原始序列(即0,1,2,3 ......)发出,而不是0,3,6,9 ......用于键0,然后是1,4,密钥1为7,密钥2为2,5,8,
您已回答了自己的问题。您按照他们发出的顺序对项目流进行操作。因此,当每一个被发射出来时,它会从操作员链中传递下来,你会看到你在这里显示的输出。
您期望的替代输出需要链等待,直到源停止为所有组发出项目。假设你有Observable.just(0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 0)
。那么你期望(0,3,0),(1,4,4,4,4,4,4),(2)作为你的输出组。如果你有4个无限的流量怎么办?您的订阅者永远不会从第一组收到0,3 ..
您可以创建您正在寻找的行为。 toList
运算符将缓存输出,直到源完成,然后将List<R>
传递给订阅者:
.subscribe(observable -> {
System.out.println("got observable " + observable + " for key " + observable.getKey());
observable.toList().subscribe(items -> {
// items is a List<Integer>
System.out.println("key " + observable.getKey() + ", items " + items);
});
});