Question

我有一个带有一些重载方法的静态类。我想知道是否有一种简单/优雅的方式将对正确重载方法的引用传递给我的另一种方法。

ObjectComparer.cs：

internal static class ObjectComparer {
    internal static void AssertAreEqual(Company expected, Company actual) {
        // ...
    }

    internal static void AssertAreEqual(Contact expected, Contact actual) {
        // ...
    }
}

CollectionComparer.cs：

internal static class CollectionComparer {
    internal static void AssertAreEqual<T>(List<T> expected, List<T> actual, Action<T, T> comparer) 
    {
        Assert.AreEqual(expected.Count, actual.Count);

        for (var i = 0; i < expected.Count; i++) 
        {
            comparer(expected[i], actual[i]);
        }
    }
}

CompanyRepositoryUnitTest.cs：

[TestMethod]
public void GetAllCompaniesTest()
{
    // some work that creates 2 collections: expectedCompanies and actualCompanies

    // I am hoping I can write the following method 
    // but I am getting an error over here saying 
    // The best overloaded method ... has invalid arguments
    CollectionComparer.AssertAreEqual(expectedCompanies, actualCompanies, ObjectComparer.AssertAreEqual);
}

修改

事实证明，编译器抱怨我的其他一个论点：actualCompanies。它是ICollection而不是List。

道歉。这是一个非常愚蠢的错误。

Answer 1

您可能希望在传递Action参数时将AssertAreEqual实例化如下：

var action=  new Action<Company,Company>(ObjectComparer.AssertAreEqual);
CollectionComparer.AssertAreEqual(expectedCompanies, actualCompanies, action);

对于Contact你可以这样做：

var action=  new Action<Contact,Contact>(ObjectComparer.AssertAreEqual);

Answer 2

我认为这也有帮助，如果你的比较器是静态的并且永远不会改变，你可能不需要每次都传递它。

internal static class CollectionComparer {
internal static void AssertAreEqual<T>(List<T> expected, List<T> actual) 
    {
        Assert.AreEqual(expected.Count, actual.Count);

        for (var i = 0; i < expected.Count; i++) 
        {
            CollectionComparer.AssertAreEqual(expected[i], actual[i]);
        }
    }
}

C＃函数引用了重载方法

修改

2 个答案: