假设我有长的独特哈希(长度为250个字符)。我将它们存储为primary key
。查找某一行会比主键基于int
?
答案 0 :(得分:1)
我通过准备表格来制作简单的基准:
create table test_int(id integer primary key);
create table test_text(id text primary key);
insert into test_int select * from generate_series(1,1000000);
insert into test_text select md5(random()::text)||md5(random()::text)||md5(random()::text)||md5(random()::text)||md5(random()::text)||md5(random()::text)||md5(random()::text)||md5(random()::text)
from generate_series(1,1000000);
analyze;
explain analyze
select * from test_int where id=<somevalue>;
Index Only Scan using test_int_pkey on test_int (cost=0.42..8.44 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.023..0.024 rows=1 loops=1)
Index Cond: (id = 58921)
Heap Fetches: 1
Planning time: 0.129 ms
Execution time: 0.058 ms
explain analyze
select * from test_text where id=<somevalue>;
Index Only Scan using test_text_pkey on test_text (cost=0.68..8.69 rows=1 width=260) (actual time=0.105..0.106 rows=1 loops=1)
Index Cond: (id = '3e74346a6a060a208b3916c9b289d1a5020fa9ff3175fdb78022001a2e5f0857a70bddfbd0f148b11ec8928edd9ce008835c9b8624f6afb7b05e2d05ad9cc049418b046ea5e0d4814ffc34fc7fad476996c634353189140702148ba6c1f8fb055ca8ff18747bb3e62f3ca7189fb5165dff850c699e6 (...)
Heap Fetches: 1
Planning time: 0.122 ms
Execution time: 0.140 ms
在我的机器上,通过数字ID查找的速度大约是文本ID的两倍;
更有趣的是PK索引大小:
select indexname, pg_size_pretty(pg_relation_size(indexname::text)) from pg_indexes where tablename in ('test_int', 'test_text');
"test_int_pkey" "21 MB"
"test_text_pkey" "420 MB"
因此250个字符长文本肯定比整数ID慢得多。