Spark DataFrame嵌套结构是否仅限于选择？

时间：2015-05-28 08:36:50

标签： apache-spark apache-spark-sql

我有一个带有一些数据的json文件，我可以用它创建DataFrame，我感兴趣的特定部分的模式如下所示：

val json: DataFrame = sqlc.load("entities_with_address2.json", "json") 

root
 |-- attributes: struct (nullable = true)
 |    |-- Address2: array (nullable = true)
 |    |    |-- value: struct (nullable = true)
 |    |    |    |-- Zip: array (nullable = true)
 |    |    |    |    |-- element: struct (containsNull = true)
 |    |    |    |    |    |-- value: struct (nullable = true)
 |    |    |    |    |    |    |-- Zip5: array (nullable = true)
 |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |-- element: struct (containsNull = true)
 |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |-- value: string (nullable = true)

当我试图选择最深的字段时： json.select("attributes.Address2.value.Zip.value.Zip5").collect()

它给了我一个例外： org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: GetField is not valid on fields of type ArrayType(ArrayType(StructType(StructField(value, StructType(StructField(Zip5, ArrayType(StructType(StructField(value, StringType, true)), true), true)), true)), true), true);

通过查看LogicalPlan的resolveGetField方法，我发现可以从StructType或ArrayType（StructType）中进行选择，但有没有办法更深入地选择？如何选择我需要的字段？

以下是完整的例外情况。

    org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: GetField is not valid on fields of type ArrayType(ArrayType(StructType(StructField(value,StructType(StructField(Zip5,ArrayType(StructType(StructField(value,StringType,true)),true),true)),true)),true),true);
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.LogicalPlan.resolveGetField(LogicalPlan.scala:265)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.LogicalPlan$$anonfun$3.apply(LogicalPlan.scala:214)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.LogicalPlan$$anonfun$3.apply(LogicalPlan.scala:214)
        at scala.collection.LinearSeqOptimized$class.foldLeft(LinearSeqOptimized.scala:111)
        at scala.collection.immutable.List.foldLeft(List.scala:84)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.LogicalPlan.resolve(LogicalPlan.scala:214)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.LogicalPlan.resolveChildren(LogicalPlan.scala:117)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$checkAnalysis$1$$anonfun$apply$1.applyOrElse(CheckAnalysis.scala:50)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$checkAnalysis$1$$anonfun$apply$1.applyOrElse(CheckAnalysis.scala:46)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$transformUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:252)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode$$anonfun$transformUp$1.apply(TreeNode.scala:252)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.CurrentOrigin$.withOrigin(TreeNode.scala:51)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.transformUp(TreeNode.scala:251)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.QueryPlan.org$apache$spark$sql$catalyst$plans$QueryPlan$$transformExpressionUp$1(QueryPlan.scala:108)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.QueryPlan$$anonfun$2$$anonfun$apply$2.apply(QueryPlan.scala:123)
        at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:244)
        at scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:244)
        at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:318)
        at scala.collection.TraversableLike$class.map(TraversableLike.scala:244)
        at scala.collection.AbstractTraversable.map(Traversable.scala:105)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.QueryPlan$$anonfun$2.apply(QueryPlan.scala:122)
        at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.next(Iterator.scala:328)
        at scala.collection.Iterator$class.foreach(Iterator.scala:727)
        at scala.collection.AbstractIterator.foreach(Iterator.scala:1157)
        at scala.collection.generic.Growable$class.$plus$plus$eq(Growable.scala:48)
        at scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer.$plus$plus$eq(ArrayBuffer.scala:103)
        at scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer.$plus$plus$eq(ArrayBuffer.scala:47)
        at scala.collection.TraversableOnce$class.to(TraversableOnce.scala:273)
        at scala.collection.AbstractIterator.to(Iterator.scala:1157)
        at scala.collection.TraversableOnce$class.toBuffer(TraversableOnce.scala:265)
        at scala.collection.AbstractIterator.toBuffer(Iterator.scala:1157)
        at scala.collection.TraversableOnce$class.toArray(TraversableOnce.scala:252)
        at scala.collection.AbstractIterator.toArray(Iterator.scala:1157)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.QueryPlan.transformExpressionsUp(QueryPlan.scala:127)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$checkAnalysis$1.apply(CheckAnalysis.scala:46)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$checkAnalysis$1.apply(CheckAnalysis.scala:44)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:89)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$class.checkAnalysis(CheckAnalysis.scala:44)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer.checkAnalysis(Analyzer.scala:40)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.SQLContext$QueryExecution.assertAnalyzed(SQLContext.scala:1080)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame.<init>(DataFrame.scala:133)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame.logicalPlanToDataFrame(DataFrame.scala:157)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame.select(DataFrame.scala:476)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame.select(DataFrame.scala:491)
        at com.reltio.analytics.PREDF.test(PREDF.scala:55)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
        at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
        at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
        at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
        at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271)
        at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
        at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309)
        at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:160)
        at com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:74)
        at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.prepareStreamsAndStart(JUnitStarter.java:211)
        at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:67)

1 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分：28)

问题是ArrayType - 您可以非常简单地重新创建此错误：

val df = Seq(Tuple1(Array[String]())).toDF("users")

此时df.printSchema显示：

root
 |-- users: array (nullable = true)
 |    |-- element: string (containsNull = true)

现在如果你尝试：

df.select($"users.element")

您会得到完全相同的例外情况 - GetField is not valid...

您有几个不同的选项来展开Array。您可以使用getItem这样的单个项目：

df.select($"users".getItem(0))

由于getItem会返回另一个Column，您可以根据需要深入挖掘：

df.select($"attributes.Address2".getItem(0).getField("value").getField("Zip").getItem(...)
// etc

但是对于数组，您可能希望以编程方式展开整个数组。如果你看看Hive处理这个问题的方式，你需要做一个LATERAL VIEW。在Spark中，您将不得不使用explode创建等效的Hive LATERAL VIEW：

case class User(name: String)
df.explode($"users"){ case Row(arr: Array[String]) =>  arr.map(User(_)) }

请注意，我在地图中使用了一个Case类 - 这就是文档的含义。如果您不想创建案例类，只需返回Tuple1（或Tuple2或Tuple3等）：

df.explode($"users"){ case Row(arr: Array[String]) =>  arr.map(Tuple1(_)) }
相关问题
最新问题