我已经使用了最新版本的rx.js从Definitely Typed打字。
当我尝试这个时:
class MyObservable extends Rx.Observable<any> { }
我得到了:A class may only extend another class.
为什么Observable
和Subject
等被定义为rx.d.ts
中类的接口instand?
如果我想创建一个扩展Observable或Subject的类,我该怎么办?
P.S。我希望这个类处理特定的域逻辑,所以我需要创建一个新类,而不是直接更新Observable的原型。
谢谢!
答案 0 :(得分:5)
我必须为WebRx解决同样的问题。正如您已经发现的那样,使用Typescript类扩展RxJS的IObservable不是一个选项,因为Observable被导出为接口。正如我在Steve Fenton的回答中所提到的那样,创建一个实现Rx.IObservable的类不会让你走得太远,因为绝大多数Rx运算符是围绕Rx定义的。从Rx.IObservable派生的可观察接口。你几乎最终会重写Rx.Observable。
我解决这个问题的方法是,使用prototypal inheritance扩展内置的Rx.Observable并通过custom d.ts文件导出扩展名更好的方法:
<强> RxExtension.ts 强>
var RxObsConstructor = (<any> Rx.Observable); // this hack is neccessary because the .d.ts for RxJs declares Observable as an interface)
/**
* Creates an read-only observable property with an optional default value from the current (this) observable
* (Note: This is the equivalent to Knockout's ko.computed)
* @param {T} initialValue? Optional initial value, valid until the observable produces a value
*/
RxObsConstructor.prototype.toProperty = function(initialValue?: any, scheduler?: Rx.IScheduler) {
scheduler = scheduler || Rx.Scheduler.currentThread;
// initialize accessor function (read-only)
var accessor: any = (newVal?: any): any => {
if (arguments.length > 0) {
internal.throwError("attempt to write to a read-only observable property");
}
if (accessor.sub == null) {
accessor.sub = accessor._source.connect();
}
return accessor.value;
};
//////////////////////////////////
// IUnknown implementation
accessor.queryInterface = (iid: string) => {
if (iid === IID.IUnknown ||
iid === IID.IObservableProperty ||
iid === IID.IDisposable)
return true;
return false;
};
//////////////////////////////////
// IDisposable implementation
accessor.dispose = () => {
if (accessor.sub) {
accessor.sub.dispose();
accessor.sub = null;
}
};
//////////////////////////////////
// IObservableProperty<T> implementation
accessor.value = initialValue;
// setup observables
accessor.changedSubject = new Rx.Subject<any>();
accessor.changed = accessor.changedSubject
.publish()
.refCount();
accessor.changingSubject = new Rx.Subject<any>();
accessor.changing = accessor.changingSubject
.publish()
.refCount();
accessor.source = this;
accessor.thrownExceptions = internal.createScheduledSubject<Error>(scheduler, app.defaultExceptionHandler);
//////////////////////////////////
// implementation
var firedInitial = false;
accessor.sub = this
.distinctUntilChanged()
.subscribe(x => {
// Suppress a non-change between initialValue and the first value
// from a Subscribe
if (firedInitial && x === accessor.value) {
return;
}
firedInitial = true;
accessor.changingSubject.onNext(x);
accessor.value = x;
accessor.changedSubject.onNext(x);
}, x=> accessor.thrownExceptions.onNext(x));
return accessor;
}
<强> RxExtension.d.ts 强>
declare module Rx {
export interface Observable<T> extends IObservable<T> {
toProperty(initialValue?: T): wx.IObservableProperty<T>;
}
}
答案 1 :(得分:0)
rx.js中的基础Observable
无法扩展,因为它更像是TypeScript module
,而不是class
(即它是单身)。
var Observable = Rx.Observable = (function () {
//...
})();
这就是它在Definitely Typed定义中被建模为接口而不是类的原因。要实现接口,必须提供与接口兼容的结构。以下是IObservable<T>
的示例。
class MyObservable<T> implements Rx.IObservable<T> {
subscribe(observer: Rx.Observer<T>): Rx.IDisposable;
subscribe(onNext?: (value: T) => void, onError?: (exception: any) => void, onCompleted?: () => void): Rx.IDisposable;
subscribe(a?: Rx.IObserver<T> | Function, onError?: (exception: any) => void, onCompleted?: () => void) {
return null;
}
subscribeOnNext(onNext: (value: T) => void, thisArg?: any): Rx.IDisposable {
return null;
}
subscribeOnError(onError: (exception: any) => void, thisArg?: any): Rx.IDisposable {
return null;
}
subscribeOnCompleted(onCompleted: () => void, thisArg?: any): Rx.IDisposable {
return null;
}
}