目前,我可以通过两个单独的SELECT语句获得我需要的结果
SELECT
COUNT(rl.refBiblioID)
FROM biblioList bl
LEFT JOIN refList rl ON bl.biblioID = rl.biblioID
GROUP BY bl.biblioID
SELECT
GROUP_CONCAT(
CONCAT_WS( ':', al.lastName, al.firstName )
ORDER BY al.authorID )
FROM biblioList bl
LEFT JOIN biblio_author ba ON ba.biblioID = bl.biblioID
JOIN authorList al ON al.authorID = ba.authorID
GROUP BY bl.biblioID
然而将它们组合起来
SELECT
GROUP_CONCAT(
CONCAT_WS( ':', al.lastName, al.firstName )
ORDER BY al.authorID ),
COUNT(rl.refBiblioID)
FROM biblioList bl
LEFT JOIN biblio_author ba ON ba.biblioID = bl.biblioID
JOIN authorList al ON al.authorID = ba.authorID
LEFT JOIN refList rl ON bl.biblioID = rl.biblioID
GROUP BY bl.biblioID
导致作者结果列具有重复的名称。如何在不使用DISTINCT的情况下从一个SELECT语句中获得所需的结果?使用子查询?
答案 0 :(得分:1)
如果子选择是可以接受的,我相信你可以通过做这样的事情来实现这个目标:
SELECT
y.authors,
COUNT(rl.refBiblioID)
FROM
(SELECT
bl.biblioId,
GROUP_CONCAT(
CONCAT_WS(':', al.lastName, al.firstName)
ORDER BY al.authorID) AS authors
FROM biblioList bl
LEFT JOIN biblio_author ba ON ba.biblioID = bl.biblioID
JOIN authorList al ON al.authorID = ba.authorID
GROUP BY bl.biblioID) y
LEFT JOIN refList rl ON (y.biblioID = rl.biblioID)
GROUP BY y.biblioID
另一个解决方案是将DISTINCT
添加到GROUP_CONCAT
,但这不是您想要的?
GROUP_CONCAT(
DISTINCT(CONCAT_WS(':', al.lastName, al.firstName) ORDER BY al.authorID)),