我尝试做的只是对BOM表(物料清单)中的项目从BOMVERSION获取相关组件/产品,然后为那些相关组件/产品获取相关组件和产品等低至7个级别。然后,我想转动结果,以便将相关项放在mydata['categorized_value'] = mydata.apply(lambda x: x['original_wt'] if x['categorized'] == 'original' else x['predicted_wt'], axis=1)
列
请参阅附带的示例数据和代码。我使用的是动态AX 2012 R2,但此示例可应用于使用材料/产品的任何系统。然而,我无法完成我的查询(我知道我没有数据表格和分区我为了简单而遗漏了)。 BOM表中的关系是itemid,通过BOMID与BOMVERSION中的itemid相关。
更新:我已经简化了数据等以使其尽可能简单/清晰,因此木材,金属,玻璃材料本身可以用于制造各种产品和材料,并且可以组合以制造产品或材料。因此,我想从一个基本组件开始,然后按级别分解关系。
DDL + DML:
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
输出看起来像
答案 0 :(得分:2)
这只是为了消除错误并获得结果,但我不知道结果是否正确:
WITH BOM1
AS ( SELECT B.ITEMID AS BITEMID ,
BV.ITEMID AS BVITEMID ,
B.BOMID
FROM #BOM AS B
JOIN #BOMVERSION AS BV ON BV.BOMID = B.BOMID
),
EXPLODE
AS ( SELECT B.BITEMID ,
B.BVITEMID ,
B.BOMID ,
0 AS [Level]
FROM BOM1 AS B
UNION ALL
SELECT B.BITEMID ,
E.BVITEMID ,
E.BOMID ,
[E].[Level] + 1
FROM EXPLODE AS E
JOIN BOM1 AS B ON B.BOMID = E.BOMID
WHERE e.Level <= 6 --narrowing levels
)
SELECT *
FROM EXPLODE PIVOT ( MAX(BVITEMID) FOR Level IN ( [0], [1], [2], [3],
[4], [5], [6], [7] ) ) AS PVTBOM
你有maxrecursion = 7
- 这不是缩小等级的地方。在CTE
的递归部分内缩小了级别。
我怀疑你的递归组织不好,所以你可以简化你的测试数据吗?只需留下几行并显示预期的输出。
<强> EDIT1:强>
WITH p AS ( SELECT *
FROM ( SELECT itemid ,
bomid ,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER ( PARTITION BY Bomid ORDER BY itemid ) rn
FROM #BOMVERSION
) t PIVOT ( MAX(itemid) FOR rn IN ( [1], [2], [3], [4],
[5], [6], [7], [8] ) ) p
)
SELECT *
FROM #bom b
JOIN p ON b.bomid = p.bomid
<强> EDIT2:强>
;WITH cte
AS ( SELECT b.itemid AS originalitem ,
b.bomid AS originalbom ,
b.bomid ,
bv.itemid AS parent ,
0 AS level
FROM #BOM b
JOIN #BOMVERSION bv ON bv.bomid = b.bomid
UNION ALL
SELECT c.originalitem ,
c.originalbom ,
b.bomid ,
bv.itemid ,
c.level + 1
FROM cte c
JOIN #BOM b ON c.parent = b.itemid
JOIN #BOMVERSION bv ON bv.bomid = b.bomid
WHERE c.level <= 6
),
tree
AS ( SELECT originalitem ,
originalbom ,
parent ,
level
FROM cte
)
SELECT *
FROM tree PIVOT ( MAX(parent) FOR level IN ( [0], [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] ) ) AS p