我有一个我写过的课程,MyEdge(它存储了两个节点以便为某些图形设置优势),而我正在努力弄清楚为什么实例似乎行为不一致。
我有一个对象new_road,当我问它时,它认为它在MyEdge类中。
isinstance(new_road, my_graph.MyEdge)
返回False。
当我指向它时,e0 = new_road, isinstance(e0, my_graph.MyEdge)
,我也会得到假,这至少是自我一致的。
当我复制时,e1 = my_graph.MyEdge(new_road.nodes), isinstance(e1,my_graph.MyEdge)
返回true。
new_road,e0和e1都返回它们的类是'my_graph.MyEdge',所以似乎isinstance(new_road,my_graph.MyEdge)
应该是真的。
为什么isinstance以不同方式处理e1和new_road1?
ipdb> new_road.__class__
<class 'my_graph.MyEdge'>
ipdb> e1 = my_graph.MyEdge(new_road.nodes)
ipdb> e1 is new_road
False
ipdb> e1 == new_road
True
ipdb> e1.__class__
<class 'my_graph.MyEdge'>
ipdb> new_road.__class__
<class 'my_graph.MyEdge'>
ipdb> isinstance(e1,my_graph.MyEdge)
True
ipdb> isinstance(new_road,my_graph.MyEdge)
False
ipdb> new_road1.__class__ is my_graph.MyEdge
False
ipdb> e1.__class__ is my_graph.MyEdge
True
我不知道它是否有用,但这是我的MyEdge类的代码:
class MyEdge(object):
""" keeps the properties of the edges in a parcel."""
def __init__(self, nodes):
self.nodes = tuple(nodes)
self.parcel1 = None
self.parcel2 = None
self.road = False
self.barrier = False
@lazy_property
def length(self):
return mgh.distance(self.nodes[0], self.nodes[1])
@lazy_property
def rads(self):
return math.atan((self.nodes[0].y - self.nodes[1].y) /
(self.nodes[0].x - self.nodes[1].x))
def __repr__(self):
return "MyEdge with nodes {} {}".format(self.nodes[0], self.nodes[1])
def __eq__(self, other):
return ((self.nodes[0] == other.nodes[0] and
self.nodes[1] == other.nodes[1]) or
(self.nodes[0] == other.nodes[1] and
self.nodes[1] == other.nodes[0]))
def __ne__(self, other):
return not self.__eq__(other)
def __hash__(self):
return hash(self.nodes)
答案 0 :(得分:4)
也许您在创建new_road和e1
之间重新加载/重新导入/覆盖该类#!/bin/bash
在此示例中,两个C()实例中的In [1]: class C(object): pass
In [2]: a = C()
In [3]: class C(object): pass
In [4]: isinstance(a, C)
Out[4]: False
看起来相同,但它们仍然不同。 __class__
可能有所帮助:
id()
所有ID都应该相同。