这种合并排序算法的实现失败,因为ArrayIndexIsOut的边界。
public static int[] mergeSort(int[] toBeSorted) {
//If there is only one item in the array, and it is said to be sorted
if (toBeSorted.length <= 1){
return toBeSorted;
}
//find the indexes of the two sub-groups
int[] left = new int[toBeSorted.length/2];
int[] right = new int[toBeSorted.length-left.length];
//Fill each sub-group with the correct numbers
//Starting with the left group
for(int i = 0; i <= left.length - 1; i++){
left[i] = toBeSorted[i];
}
//Then the right group
for(int i = left.length - 1; i <= toBeSorted.length - 1; i++){
right[i] = toBeSorted[i];
}
//Merge sort each sub-group
mergeSort(left);
mergeSort(right);
//Merge the two sub-groups
toBeSorted = merge(left, right);
return toBeSorted;
}
//Merging method
public static int[] merge(int[] left, int[] right){
//Answer array
int[] merged = new int[left.length + right.length];
//Next index to check in each array
int lCursor = 0;
int rCursor = 0;
//Next index to place numbers into answer
int mergedCursor = 0;
//The merging part:
//If there are still items to merge, then do so
while(mergedCursor != merged.length){
//left index is empty
if(lCursor == left.length) {
merged[mergedCursor] = right[rCursor];
//increment the correct cursors
rCursor += 1;
mergedCursor += 1;
}
//right index is empty
else if(rCursor == right.length) {
merged[mergedCursor] = right[lCursor];
//increment the correct cursors
lCursor += 1;
mergedCursor += 1;
}
//Left side is smaller
else if(left[lCursor]<right[rCursor]){
merged[mergedCursor] = left[lCursor];
//increment the correct cursors
lCursor += 1;
mergedCursor +=1;
}
//Right side is smaller
else if(right[rCursor]<left[lCursor]){
merged[mergedCursor] = right[rCursor];
//increment the correct cursors
rCursor += 1;
mergedCursor +=1;
}
}
//return the merged output
return merged;
}
for循环中的行将数字分配给正确的数组是问题所在,但我不知道为什么。
另外,最初我在i = left.length
循环中有for
,但这导致整个右侧数组被设置为零。
编辑:我将第二个for循环更改为:
for(int i = 0; i <= right.length - 1; i++){
right[i] = toBeSorted[i + left.length];
}
现在正确填充了正确的数组。
编辑2:我修复了合并部分。由于某些奇怪的原因,当发现索引为空时,我仍然从空数组中取出。我还将其更改为增强的for循环以摆脱mergedCursor。新的合并方法如下:
public static int[] merge(int[] left, int[] right){
//Answer array
int[] merged = new int[left.length + right.length];
//Next index to check in each array
int lCursor = 0;
int rCursor = 0;
//The merging part:
//Keep going until output array is full
for (int i = 0; i <= merged.length - 1; i++) {
//left index is empty
if(lCursor == left.length) {
merged[i] = right[rCursor];
//increment the correct cursor
rCursor += 1;
}
//right index is empty
else if(rCursor == right.length) {
merged[i] = left[lCursor];
//increment the correct cursor
lCursor += 1;
}
//Left side is smaller
else if(left[lCursor]<right[rCursor]){
merged[i] = left[lCursor];
//increment the correct cursor
lCursor += 1;
}
//Right side is smaller
else if(right[rCursor]<left[lCursor]){
merged[i] = right[rCursor];
//increment the correct cursor
rCursor += 1;
}
}
//return the merged output
return merged;
}
答案 0 :(得分:1)
在第二个for循环中,你开始(i)with(left.Length - 1)。你想要的是
for (int i = right.Length, j = 0; (j <= right.Length - 1) && (i <= toBeSorted.Length - 1); i++, j++)
{
right[j] = toBeSorted[i];
}
此外,结束第一个循环的值(left.Length - 1)与开始下一个循环的值相同。这意味着您在两个(左侧和右侧)阵列中都获得了中间值。但这可能不是你想要的。所以我把它改为just(right.Length)而不是(right.Length - 1)。