使用std :: atomic(免费互斥)

时间:2015-04-28 20:35:42

标签: multithreading c++11 atomic readerwriterlock

下面是对多个读/写共享数据的尝试,它使用std :: atomics和busy wait而不是互斥和条件变量来在读者和编写者之间进行同步。我很困惑为什么那里的断言受到了打击。我确定逻辑中某处有一个错误,但我不确定它在哪里。

实现背后的想法是读取的线程在编写完成之前一直在旋转。当他们进入读取函数时,他们会增加m_numReaders计数,当他们等待编写器时,他们会增加m_numWaiting计数。

这个想法是m_numWaiting应该总是小于或等于m_numReaders,前提是m_numWaiting总是在m_numReaders之后递增并在m_numReaders之前递减。

不应该存在m_numWaiting大于m_numReaders(或者我没有看到它)的情况,因为读取器总是首先递增读取器计数器并且有时仅递增等待计数器并且等待计数器总是先递减。

然而,这似乎发生了什么,因为这些断言正在受到打击。 如果你看到它,有人可以指出逻辑错误吗?

谢谢!

#include <iostream>
#include <thread> 
#include <assert.h>

template<typename T>
class ReadWrite
{

public:

    ReadWrite() : m_numReaders(0), m_numWaiting(0), m_writing(false)
    {
        m_writeFlag.clear();
    }

    template<typename functor>
    void read(functor& readFunc)
    {
        m_numReaders++;
        std::atomic<bool>waiting(false);
        while (m_writing)
        {
            if(!waiting)
            {
                m_numWaiting++; // m_numWaiting should always be increased after m_numReaders
                waiting = true;
            }
        }

        assert(m_numWaiting <= m_numReaders);

        readFunc(&m_data);

        assert(m_numWaiting <= m_numReaders); // <-- These asserts get hit ?

        if(waiting)
        {
            m_numWaiting--; // m_numWaiting should always be decreased before m_numReaders
        }

        m_numReaders--;

        assert(m_numWaiting <= m_numReaders); // <-- These asserts get hit ?
    }

    //
    // Only a single writer can operate on this at any given time.
    //
    template<typename functor>
    void write(functor& writeFunc)
    {
        while (m_writeFlag.test_and_set());

        // Ensure no readers present
        while (m_numReaders);

        // At this point m_numReaders may have been increased !
        m_writing = true;

        // If a reader entered before the writing flag was set, wait for
        // it to finish
        while (m_numReaders > m_numWaiting);

        writeFunc(&m_data);

        m_writeFlag.clear();
        m_writing = false;
    }
private:
    T m_data;
    std::atomic<int64_t> m_numReaders;
    std::atomic<int64_t> m_numWaiting;
    std::atomic<bool> m_writing;
    std::atomic_flag m_writeFlag;
};

int main(int argc, const char * argv[])
{
    const size_t numReaders = 2;
    const size_t numWriters = 1;
    const size_t numReadWrites = 10000000;

    std::thread readThreads[numReaders];
    std::thread writeThreads[numWriters];

    ReadWrite<int> dummyData;

    auto writeFunc = [&](int* pData)    { return; }; // intentionally empty
    auto readFunc = [&](int* pData)     { return; }; // intentionally empty

    auto readThreadProc = [&]()
    {
        size_t numReads = numReadWrites;
        while (numReads--)
        {
            dummyData.read(readFunc);
        }
    };

    auto writeThreadProc = [&]()
    {
        size_t numWrites = numReadWrites;
        while (numWrites--)
        {
            dummyData.write(writeFunc);
        }
    };

    for (std::thread& thread : writeThreads)    { thread = std::thread(writeThreadProc);}
    for (std::thread& thread : readThreads)     { thread = std::thread(readThreadProc);}
    for (std::thread& thread : writeThreads)    { thread.join();}
    for (std::thread& thread : readThreads)     { thread.join();}
}

0 个答案:

没有答案