我有一个使用反射操作其他类的类:
package com.cw.cmt;
public class Container<T extends Class<?>> {
private final Class<T> clazz;
public Container(final Class<T> clazz) {
this.clazz = clazz;
System.out.println("Expensive constructor for " + this);
}
@Override
public String toString() {
return String.format("Container [clazz=%s]", clazz);
}
}
因为这些构建起来可能很昂贵,所以我想将它们缓存在Map中,以便只根据需要构建它们:
package com.cw.cmt;
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap;
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentMap;
public class ContainerCache {
private static final ConcurrentMap<Class<?>, Container<? extends Class<?>>> cache = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();
public static <C extends Class<?>> Container<C> getContainer(final Class<C> clazz) {
final Container<? extends Class<?>> result = cache.computeIfAbsent(clazz, k -> new Container<C>(clazz));
// it would be nice to eliminate this cast!
return (Container<C>) result;
}
}
我在调用这个getContainer方法时遇到了正确的通用语法。
// The parameterized method <Class<String>>getContainer(Class<Class<String>>) of type ContainerCache
// is not applicable for the arguments (Class<String>)
ContainerCache.getContainer(String.class);
// Bound mismatch: The generic method getContainer(Class<C>) of type ContainerCache is not applicable
// for the arguments (Class<String>). The inferred type String is not a valid substitute for the bounded
// parameter <C extends Class<?>>
ContainerCache.<String>getContainer(String.class);
// The parameterized method <Class<String>>getContainer(Class<Class<String>>) of type ContainerCache
// is not applicable for the arguments (Class<String>)
ContainerCache.<Class<String>>getContainer(String.class);
答案 0 :(得分:0)
我认为Container
public class Container<T extends Class<?>> {
private final Class<T> clazz;
}
因此,clazz
是Class<Class<?>>
因为T extends Class<?>
。
一个简单的修正:
public class Container<T> {
private final Class<T> clazz;
}
和
public class ContainerCache {
private static final ConcurrentMap<Class<?>, Container<?>> cache = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();
public static <T> Container<T> getContainer(final Class<T> clazz) {
return (Container<T>) (cache.computeIfAbsent(clazz, k -> new Container<T>(clazz)));
}
}
实际上,我没有一个很好的解决方案来避免演员:)