我试图获取最多2048字节的输入文件,并将其放在layer4中自己的数组中。我也试图将数组的大小放在数组的spot [0]中供以后使用。当layer4完成时,我试图将指向名为code
的数组的指针传递给transmit
函数,它将该值传递给layer3
并将数组放入结构中。目前,当我将layer4和layer3中指针的地址相互比较时,它们匹配。但是,当我在layer3中检查数组中的值时,它们与我的输入文件中的数组值不匹配。此代码将成为更大项目的一部分。我收到的各种警告都在我的代码底部:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
main()
{
int *senddata;
senddata = layer4(); // get pointer address of input array
transmit(senddata); //put pointer value into transmit
}
int layer4(){
FILE *file = fopen("sendtext.txt", "r"); //
char *code;
size_t n = 0;
int c;
if (file == NULL)
return NULL; //could not open file
code = malloc(2048); //allocate memory
while ((c = fgetc(file)) != EOF)
{
n++;
code[n] = (char) c;
printf("%c", code[n]);
}
code[n] = '\0';
n = n-1; // for some reason the byte size is +1 for what it should be
code[0] = n;
printf("Check Pointer Address in layer 4: %p \n", code); //test to see pointer address
printf("Check to see value in pointer:%c \n", code[0]); //check to see if the byte size was placed in the array
printf("Byte size:%zd\n", n); /// see array size
return code;
}
transmit(int* getdata){ //gets pointer value
int newdata = getdata;
int g = layer3(newdata); //puts pointer into new function
}
layer3(int b){
int x = b;
int w = &x;
char *MSS;
MSS = malloc(60);
printf("Check to see value in pointer:%c \n", w);
printf("Check Pointer Address in layer 3:%p \n", x); //test to see pointer address
struct l3hdr {
char ver;
char src_ipaddr[16];
char dest_ipaddr[16];
char reserved[7];
};
struct l3pdu {
// put array here
struct l3hdr hdr3;
};
}
Q sadfasd fsa asd fsadf sad f /// This is my input testfile
Check Pointer Address in layer 4: 0xa81250
Check to see Byte size in array:
Check to see first input character in array:Q
Byte size:29
Check to see value in pointer:P
Check Pointer Address in layer 3:0xa81250
lab.c:20:9: warning: return makes integer from pointer without a cast [enabled by default]
return NULL; //could not open file
^
lab.c:37:2: warning: format ‘%c’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but argument 2 has type ‘char *’ [-Wformat=]
printf("Check to see value in pointer:%c \n", code);
^
lab.c:43:1: warning: return makes integer from pointer without a cast [enabled by default]
return code;
^
lab.c: In function ‘transmit’:
lab.c:47:15: warning: initialization makes integer from pointer without a cast [enabled by default]
int newdata = getdata;
^
lab.c: In function ‘layer3’:
lab.c:64:9: warning: initialization makes integer from pointer without a cast [enabled by default]
int w = &x;
^
lab.c:72:1: warning: format ‘%p’ expects argument of type ‘void *’, but argument 2 has type ‘int’ [-Wformat=]
printf("Check Pointer Address in layer 3:%p \n", x); //test to see pointer address
^
答案 0 :(得分:1)
你在整个地方混合指针和整数。这并不总是会导致问题,但最好是不好的做法。对于您的具体问题,原因可能是:
transmit(int* getdata){ //gets pointer value
int newdata = getdata;
int g = layer3(newdata); //puts pointer into new function
}
layer3(int b){
int x = b;
int w = &x;
将int指针传递给layer3调用。但是你把它的地址放在了layer3里面。那不是你想要的。同样,整体和指针的混合不是这里的根本原因,但确实导致了混乱。你的代码应该是这样的:
transmit(int* getdata){ //gets pointer value
int g = layer3(getdata); //puts pointer into new function
}
layer3(int *b){
int *w = b;
也就是说,不要更改指向整数的指针。只需将指针直接传递(特别是进入layer3)。编译器警告已经强烈暗示了这一点。如果你摆脱了所有这些警告,那么你走在正确轨道上的一个好兆头。
还有一些提示: