Oracle Check Constraint

Question

我一直在努力解决这个检查约束几个小时，并且希望有人能够解释为什么这个检查约束没有做我认为它应该做的事情。

ALTER TABLE CLIENTS
add CONSTRAINT CHK_DISABILITY_INCOME_TYPE_ID CHECK ((IS_DISABLED IS NULL AND DISABILITY_INCOME_TYPE_ID IS NULL) OR (IS_DISABLED = 0 AND DISABILITY_INCOME_TYPE_ID IS NULL) OR (IS_DISABLED = 1));

基本上，您必须被禁用以收集残疾收入。看起来似乎没有强制执行此检查约束(IS_DISABLED IS NULL AND DISABILITY_INCOME_TYPE_ID IS NULL)的第一部分（见下文）。

DISABILITY_INCOME_TYPE_ID的可用值为1和2，通过外键强制执行。 IS_DISABLED和DISABILITY_INCOME_TYPE_ID都可以为空。

-- incorrectly succeeds (Why?)
INSERT INTO CLIENTS (IS_DISABLED, DISABILITY_INCOME_TYPE_ID) VALUES (null, 1);
INSERT INTO CLIENTS (IS_DISABLED, DISABILITY_INCOME_TYPE_ID) VALUES (null, 2);

-- correctly fails
INSERT INTO CLIENTS (IS_DISABLED, DISABILITY_INCOME_TYPE_ID) VALUES (0, 1);
INSERT INTO CLIENTS (IS_DISABLED, DISABILITY_INCOME_TYPE_ID) VALUES (0, 2);

-- correctly succeeds
INSERT INTO CLIENTS (IS_DISABLED, DISABILITY_INCOME_TYPE_ID) VALUES (0, null);
INSERT INTO CLIENTS (IS_DISABLED, DISABILITY_INCOME_TYPE_ID) VALUES (1, 1);
INSERT INTO CLIENTS (IS_DISABLED, DISABILITY_INCOME_TYPE_ID) VALUES (1, 2);
INSERT INTO CLIENTS (IS_DISABLED, DISABILITY_INCOME_TYPE_ID) VALUES (1, null);
INSERT INTO CLIENTS (IS_DISABLED, DISABILITY_INCOME_TYPE_ID) VALUES (null, null);

感谢您的帮助， 迈克尔

Answer 1

虽然我没有Oracle，但我使用PostgreSQL进行了快速测试，您的第一个示例（IS_DISABLED为NULL且DISABILITY_INCOME_TYPE_ID为1）：

postgres=> select (null is null and 1 is null);
 ?column?
----------
 f
(1 registro)

postgres=> select (null is null and 1 is null) or (null = 0 and 1 is null);
 ?column?
----------
 f
(1 registro)

postgres=> select (null is null and 1 is null) or (null = 0 and 1 is null) or (null = 1);
 ?column?
----------

(1 registro)

在这里我们清楚地看到，在这种情况下，你的表达式（至少在PostgreSQL上）返回NULL。来自the manual，

  

[...]评估为TRUE或UNKNOWN的表达式成功。如果插入或更新操作的任何行产生FALSE结果，则会引发错误异常，并且插入或更新不会更改数据库。 [...]

因此，如果Oracle的行为与PostgreSQL相同，则检查约束将传递。

要查看是否是这种情况，请通过明确检查它并查看它是否有效来避免使用NULL shenanigans：

CHECK ((IS_DISABLED IS NULL AND DISABILITY_INCOME_TYPE_ID IS NULL)
    OR (IS_DISABLED IS NOT NULL AND IS_DISABLED = 0 AND DISABILITY_INCOME_TYPE_ID IS NULL)
    OR (IS_DISABLED IS NOT NULL AND IS_DISABLED = 1));

Answer 2

在检查条件下尝试使用NVL。

Answer 3

我不确定为什么复合检查不起作用，但这有效：

ALTER TABLE CLIENTS ADD CONSTRAINT CHK_1 CHECK (IS_DISABLED = 0 AND DISABILITY_INCOME_TYPE_ID IS NULL)

ALTER TABLE CLIENTS ADD CONSTRAINT CHK_2 CHECK (IS_DISABLED IS NULL AND DISABILITY_INCOME_TYPE_ID IS NULL)

ALTER TABLE CLIENTS ADD CONSTRAINT CHK_3 CHECK (IS_DISABLED = 1)

此致 ķ

Answer 4

此解决方案有效。

CHECK
((IS_DISABLED IS NULL AND NVL(DISABILITY_INCOME_TYPE_ID, 0) = 0)
OR (IS_DISABLED = 0 AND NVL(DISABILITY_INCOME_TYPE_ID, 0) = 0) 
OR (IS_DISABLED IS NOT NULL AND IS_DISABLED = 1));