这让我疯了。我已经把它剥离到最低限度而不会失去上下文(我想!)
我要做的就是检查当我更新一个值并将其保存到数据库时,该值已保存。我想这样做是因为我需要编写一些其他代码,这些代码在before_save回调中有条件地阻止了这一点,并且在我确定它正常工作之前我无法测试它!
工厂和规格在下面,我确定它真的很蠢但是我无法理解......
FactoryGirl.define do
factory :programme do
name 'Trainee Programme'
end
factory :membership do
programme
end
factory :specialty do
sequence(:name) { |n| "Specialty #{n}" }
end
factory :user do
sequence(:email) { |n| "factorygirl-user-#{n}@remailer.org" }
password 'password'
password_confirmation 'password'
factory :trainee, class: User do
sequence(:email) { |n| "factorygirl-trainee-#{n}@remailer.org" }
name 'Factory Girl Trainee'
after(:create) do |user|
FactoryGirl.create(:membership, user: user, start_date: 1.day.ago)
end
end
end
end
describe Membership do
let(:trainee) { FactoryGirl.create(:trainee) }
it 'sets specialty' do
puts trainee.current_membership.inspect
trainee.current_membership.specialty = specialty
puts trainee.current_membership.inspect
trainee.current_membership.save!
puts trainee.current_membership.inspect
expect(trainee.current_membership.specialty).to eq(specialty)
end
end
规范失败,因为期望值为零。当我运行代码时,我得到的调试输出是:
#<Membership id: 11, user_id: 11, programme_id: 11, start_date: "2015-03-10", end_date: nil, created_at: "2015-03-11 22:02:51", updated_at: "2015-03-11 22:02:51", options: {}, specialty_id: nil, membership_type_id: nil>
#<Membership id: 11, user_id: 11, programme_id: 11, start_date: "2015-03-10", end_date: nil, created_at: "2015-03-11 22:02:51", updated_at: "2015-03-11 22:02:51", options: {}, specialty_id: nil, membership_type_id: nil>
#<Membership id: 11, user_id: 11, programme_id: 11, start_date: "2015-03-10", end_date: nil, created_at: "2015-03-11 22:02:51", updated_at: "2015-03-11 22:02:51", options: {}, specialty_id: nil, membership_type_id: nil>
所以它好像专业的分配从未发生过?
答案 0 :(得分:7)
尝试重新加载trainee
,例如
expect(trainee.reload.current_membership.specialty).to eq(specialty)
答案 1 :(得分:1)
感谢BroiState和Mori给我一些指示,我能够确定它与持久性有关(特别是我的一个对象方法不尊重它!)
trainee.current_membership的代码如下:
def current_membership
return unless memberships.current.any?
memberships.current.first
end
在会员资格中使用这些相关范围...
scope :started, -> { self.where("#{table_name}.#{_start_field}::TIMESTAMP < '#{Time.now}'") }
scope :not_ended, -> { self.where("#{table_name}.#{_end_field} IS NULL OR #{table_name}.#{_end_field}::TIMESTAMP > '#{Time.now}'") }
scope :current, -> { self.started.not_ended }
因此,每次对trainee.current_membership的调用都会给我一个新的“当前&#39;会员记录
通过明确使用相同的对象,规范传递正常,即:
it 'sets specialty' do
membership = trainee.current_membership
membership.specialty = specialty
membership.save!
expect(membership.specialty).to eq(specialty.reload)
end
答案 2 :(得分:0)
我能想到的唯一原因是speciality
是一个新的非持久记录。由于membership belongs_to :speciality
和membership
已经保留,因此在分配和保存时都不会保存关联的对象。简而言之,确保在创建关联之前保存speciality
。