请在这里要求进行健全检查......
ExtJS 4.2 comboBox Typeahead有效,但在以下条件下检索valueField时出现问题: -
1)如果用户键入一个值,然后点击输入或单击选择组合列表,而不是点击其他地方,那么valueField为空,但所选的值存在。
2)假设组合框项目被正确选择,如果我输入一个附加字符然后退格该字符,组合框就不能再找到valueField ..几乎就像它已经重置一样。
小提琴示例
https://fiddle.sencha.com/#fiddle/je1
如何重现
如果您在组合框中输入Maggie,您将在控制台窗口中看到valueField ID,如果您追加一个字符然后退格该字符,则控制台窗口中的ID为空
(您需要打开控制台窗口才能看到输出)
forceSelection不解决这个问题,因为我有一个模板,它不会接受组合框中不属于商店的条目,我需要使用sumID作为我的valueField,因为我需要检索并传递该值到服务器。
答案 0 :(得分:1)
谢谢大家,很棒,拥有这样一个伟大的社区!
我能够通过使用forceSelection并覆盖setValue来解决这个问题,从而允许通过forceSelection选择不在商店但在组合中的模板项。通过使用组合框,IMO来获得良好的外观和感觉,forceSelection是可行的方法。
这是我的覆盖,请参阅语句//覆盖的开始
这是一个快速修复,当我回到办公室时,我将改进声明,下面我从记忆中粘贴解决方案,你明白了。
setValue: function(value, doSelect) {
var me = this,
valueNotFoundText = me.valueNotFoundText,
inputEl = me.inputEl,
i, len, record,
dataObj,
matchedRecords = [],
displayTplData = [],
processedValue = [];
if (me.store.loading) {
// Called while the Store is loading. Ensure it is processed by the onLoad method.
me.value = value;
me.setHiddenValue(me.value);
return me;
}
// This method processes multi-values, so ensure value is an array.
value = Ext.Array.from(value);
// Loop through values, matching each from the Store, and collecting matched records
for (i = 0, len = value.length; i < len; i++) {
record = value[i];
if (!record || !record.isModel) {
record = me.findRecordByValue(record);
}
// record found, select it.
if (record) {
matchedRecords.push(record);
displayTplData.push(record.data);
processedValue.push(record.get(me.valueField));
}
// record was not found, this could happen because
// store is not loaded or they set a value not in the store
else {
//start of override
// 'Select All Names' is the template item that was added // to the combo box, it looks like an entry from the store
// but it is not in the store
if (me.forceSelection && me.getDisplayValue() === 'Select All Names'){
processedValue.push(value[i]);
dataObj = {};
dataObj[me.displayField] = value[i];
displayTplData.push(dataObj);
}
//end of override
if (!me.forceSelection) {
processedValue.push(value[i]);
dataObj = {};
dataObj[me.displayField] = value[i];
displayTplData.push(dataObj);
// TODO: Add config to create new records on selection of a value that has no match in the Store
}
// Else, if valueNotFoundText is defined, display it, otherwise display nothing for this value
else if (Ext.isDefined(valueNotFoundText)) {
displayTplData.push(valueNotFoundText);
}
}
}
// Set the value of this field. If we are multiselecting, then that is an array.
me.setHiddenValue(processedValue);
me.value = me.multiSelect ? processedValue : processedValue[0];
if (!Ext.isDefined(me.value)) {
me.value = null;
}
me.displayTplData = displayTplData; //store for getDisplayValue method
me.lastSelection = me.valueModels = matchedRecords;
if (inputEl && me.emptyText && !Ext.isEmpty(value)) {
inputEl.removeCls(me.emptyCls);
}
// Calculate raw value from the collection of Model data
me.setRawValue(me.getDisplayValue());
me.checkChange();
if (doSelect !== false) {
me.syncSelection();
}
me.applyEmptyText();
return me;
},
答案 1 :(得分:0)
查看Combobox的来源并尝试覆盖此方法,如下所示
doLocalQuery: function(queryPlan) {
var me = this,
queryString = queryPlan.query;
if (!me.queryFilter) {
me.queryFilter = new Ext.util.Filter({
id: me.id + '-query-filter',
anyMatch: me.anyMatch,
caseSensitive: me.caseSensitive,
root: 'data',
property: me.displayField
});
me.store.addFilter(me.queryFilter, false);
}
if (queryString || !queryPlan.forceAll) {
me.queryFilter.disabled = false;
me.queryFilter.setValue(me.enableRegEx ? new RegExp(queryString) : queryString);
}
else {
me.queryFilter.disabled = true;
}
me.store.filter();
if (me.store.getCount()) {
if (me.rawValue === me.lastSelection[0].get(me.displayField)){
me.setValue(me.lastSelection);
} else {
if(me.store.getCount() === 1){
me.setValue(me.store.first());
}
me.expand();
}
} else {
me.collapse();
}
me.afterQuery(queryPlan);
},