每次我在运算符的定义中添加注释时,它都会开始给我错误,但删除注释会立即消除错误。我不明白为什么评论会对代码产生任何影响。另外,对于一般操作员超载的一般建议也不胜感激。
继承我的班级模板:
template<class THING>
struct LLNode
{
THING data;
LLNode<THING> *next;
LLNode<THING> *prev;
};
template<class THING>
class LinkedList
{
private:
//use a doubly linked-list based implementation
//keep a head and tail pointer for efficiency
LLNode<THING> *Head;
LLNode<THING> *Tail;
int count;
public:
//setup initial conditions
LinkedList();
//delete all dynamic memory, etc.
~LinkedList();
//constant bracket operator to access specific element
const THING& operator[](int);
//Bracket operator to access specific element
THING& operator[](int);
//Equality operator to check if two lists are equal
bool operator==(const LinkedList<THING>&);
//Inequality operator to check if two lists are equal
bool operator!=(const LinkedList<THING>&);
//add x to front of list
void addFront(THING);
//add x to back of list
void addBack(THING);
//add x as the ith thing in the list
//if there are less than i things, add it to the back
void add(THING, int);
//remove and return front item from list
THING removeFront();
//remove and return back item from list
THING removeBack();
//return value of back item (but don't remove it)
THING getBack();
//return value of front item (but don't remove it)
THING getFront();
//return how many items are in the list
int length();
//print all elements in the linked list
void print();
};
我正在处理的运营商:
template<class THING>
THING& LinkedList<THING>::operator[](int index)
{
}
template<class THING>
bool LinkedList<THING>::operator==(const LinkedList<THING>& list_one, const LinkedList<THING>& list_two)
{
//checking for same size on both lists
//if both are same size, move on to checking for same data
if(list_one.count != list_two.count)
{
return false;
}
else
{
//boolean flag to hold truth of sameness
bool flag = true;
//two pointers to go through
LLNode<THING> *temp_one = list_one.Head;
LLNode<THING> *temp_two = list_two.Head;
while(temp_one != NULL && temp_two != NULL)
{
if(temp_one->data != temp_two->data)
{
flag = false;
break;
}
else
{
temp_one = temp_one->next;
temp_two = temp_two->next;
}
}
return flag;
}
}
答案 0 :(得分:0)
正如您所说,这些不是编译错误:它们是智能感知错误。这些错误需要一段时间才能在扩展中刷新,因此在大多数情况下并不是非常有说明性的,并且Intellisense在添加注释时并不是一个很好的问题,并且在碰撞时更加糟糕与其他扩展。
摆脱错误的一种方法是剪切粘贴所有代码(只需去 ctrl + a,ctrl + x,ctrl + v )。这迫使Intellisense刷新。
我个人最喜欢的另一种方式是关闭Intellisense :)你可以看到如何做到这一点in here。