将make_move_iterator与vector :: insert一起使用是否有意义?(C ++)

时间:2015-03-03 18:43:53

标签: c++ vector insert iterator move

我有一个矢量矢量,我想逐个连接它们以形成一个长矢量。这可以通过最后插入来完成。灵感来自this question,我认为使用make_move_iterator会将copy替换为move,从而效率更高。但是以下测试表明make_move_iterator会导致更长的时间消耗。

#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
#include <chrono>
using namespace std;

int main()
{
    string a = "veryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryverylongstring";
    vector<string> b(10,a);
    vector<vector<string> > c(1000,b);
    vector<string> d,e;

    auto t1 = chrono::system_clock::now();
    for(auto& item : c)
    {
        d.insert(d.end(),item.begin(),item.end());
    }
    cout << c[0][0].length() << endl;

    auto t2 = chrono::system_clock::now();
    for(auto& item:c)
    {
        e.insert(e.end(), std::make_move_iterator(item.begin()),std::make_move_iterator(item.end()));
    }

    auto t3 = chrono::system_clock::now();    
    cout << chrono::duration_cast<chrono::nanoseconds>(t2-t1).count() << endl;
    cout << chrono::duration_cast<chrono::nanoseconds>(t3-t2).count() << endl;
    cout << c[0][0].length()  << endl;
    cout << "To check that c has been moved from." <<endl;
}

//Output:
//122
//1212000
//1630000
//0
//To check that c has been moved from.

因此,我想知道,这种方法真的有助于提高效率吗?

1 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:0)

问题描述中的测试是在cpp shell

上进行的

我后来尝试了ideone,结果发现make_move_iterator显然更有效率。所以它似乎是依赖于编译器的东西。

122
320576
98434
0
To check that c has been moved from.