我正在使用Jest测试React / Reflux应用程序。我在商店里有以下功能:
onLoad: function() {
console.log("ORIGINAL LOAD");
// http request here
}
我试图嘲笑它,以便在不做实际网络的情况下完成它需要做的事情:
beforeEach(function() {
// mock out onLoad so instead of making API call the store gets test data
PostStore.onLoad = jest.genMockFunction().mockImplementation(function () {
var p1 = new Post(
"54da7df5119025513400000a", // id
"Test Post", // title
"Kji6ftLjUqhElgnqOBqMUKxYONpU7nK/cu6jTA==\n", // owner anonId
"Test Course 1", // course name
"This is a test!", // content
6, // upvotes
2, // downvotes
["Kji6ftLjUqhElgnqOBqMUKxYONpU7nK/cu6jTA==\n"] // voter anonIds
);
this.posts = [p1];
console.log("mocked function");
});
// component initialized here
});
然而,看起来似乎从未创建过模拟函数。当我运行测试时,控制台仍然会记录ORIGINAL LOAD
。
覆盖对象方法的正确方法是什么,以便通过执行ajax调用而不是在posts
中设置PostStore
数组,而只是使用测试数据设置它?
答案 0 :(得分:5)
几乎在那里,您需要做的就是
const onLoad = jest.fn().mockImplementation(function () {
var p1 = new Post();//Add your stuff here
this.posts = [p1];
console.log("mocked function");
});
PostStore.onLoad = onLoad.bind(PostStore); //PostStore is your object.
答案 1 :(得分:1)
我找到了jest模拟实例函数 It's here
例如:
import expect from 'expect';
jest.mock('../libs/utils/Master');
import Master from '../libs/utils/Master';
Master.mockImplementation(() => {
return {
returnOne: jest.fn().mockReturnValueOnce(1)
}
})
describe('test Master', function() {
it('test search', function() {
let master = new Master();
expect(master.returnOne()).toEqual(1);
});
});