我开发了一个C软件,它使用不同的循环在IP和端口上打开套接字(例如192.168.1.10 port = 80),并检查是否有人打开了; 这是代码:
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
#include <netdb.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <arpa/inet.h>
int main(void)
{
int sockfd = 0,n = 0;
char recvBuff[1024];
struct sockaddr_in serv_addr;
memset(recvBuff, '0' ,sizeof(recvBuff));
if((sockfd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0))< 0)
{
printf("\n Error : Could not create socket \n");
}
serv_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
int i;
char buf[15];
for (i = 1; i < 255; i++) {
sprintf(buf, "192.168.1.%d", i); // puts string into buffer
for (int port = 0; port<=1024; port++) {
// Problem
// int sockfd = 0,n = 0;
// char recvBuff[1024];
// struct sockaddr_in serv_addr;
//
// memset(recvBuff, '0' ,sizeof(recvBuff));
// if((sockfd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0))< 0)
// {
// printf("\n Error : Could not create socket \n");
// return 1;
// }
serv_addr.sin_port = htons(port);
serv_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = inet_addr(buf);
if(connect(sockfd, (struct sockaddr *)&serv_addr, sizeof(serv_addr))<0)
{
// printf("The port %d of host %s is not open \n",port,buf);
}else{
printf("The port %d of host %s is open \n",port,buf);
}
}
}
return 0;
}
在第二个版本中,我添加了connection_nonblocking方法,它减少了可能出现的问题。 这是使用OpenMP指令提高性能的版本;你有什么想法改进吗?
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
#include <netdb.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <arpa/inet.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <omp.h>
int connect_nonblock (int sockfd, const struct sockaddr *saptr, socklen_t salen)
{
int n, valopt;
socklen_t len;
fd_set rset;
struct timeval tv;
long int arg;
arg = fcntl(sockfd, F_GETFL, NULL);
arg |= O_NONBLOCK;
fcntl(sockfd, F_SETFL, arg);
n = connect(sockfd, saptr, salen);
if (n == 0) {
// completed immediately
arg &= (~O_NONBLOCK);
fcntl(sockfd, F_SETFL, arg);
close(sockfd);
return 0;
}
if (n < 0) {
if (errno != EINPROGRESS) {
// fail somehow...
arg &= (~O_NONBLOCK);
fcntl(sockfd, F_SETFL, arg);
close(sockfd);
return -1;
}
else {
tv.tv_sec = 0;
tv.tv_usec = 10000;
FD_ZERO(&rset);
FD_SET(sockfd, &rset);
n = select(sockfd + 1, NULL, &rset, NULL, &tv);
if (n < 0 && errno != EINTR) {
arg &= (~O_NONBLOCK);
fcntl(sockfd, F_SETFL, arg);
close(sockfd);
return -1;
}
else if (n > 0) {
len = sizeof(int);
getsockopt(sockfd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ERROR, (void*)(&valopt), &len);
if (valopt != 0) {
arg &= (~O_NONBLOCK);
fcntl(sockfd, F_SETFL, arg);
close(sockfd);
return -1;
}
}
else {
arg &= (~O_NONBLOCK);
fcntl(sockfd, F_SETFL, arg);
close(sockfd);
return -1;
}
}
}
arg &= (~O_NONBLOCK);
fcntl(sockfd, F_SETFL, arg);
close(sockfd);
return 0;
}
int main(void)
{
int sockfd = 0;
struct sockaddr_in serv_addr;
int i, port;
char buf[15];
double end, start = omp_get_wtime();
for (i = 1; i <= 255; i++) {
sprintf(buf, "192.168.1.%d", i); // puts string into buffer
fprintf(stdout, "Checking address: %s\n", buf);
//omp_set_num_threads(1);
#pragma omp parallel for private(sockfd,serv_addr,port)
for (port = 0; port <= 1024; port++) {
if ((sockfd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0)) < 0)
{
perror("socket");
}
memset(&serv_addr, 0, sizeof(serv_addr));
serv_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
serv_addr.sin_port = htons(port);
serv_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = inet_addr(buf);
if (connect_nonblock(sockfd, (struct sockaddr*)&serv_addr, sizeof(serv_addr)) < 0) {
/* uncoment this but if you want */
//fprintf(stdout, "The port %d of host %s is not open.\n", port, buf);
;
}
else {
fprintf(stdout, "The port %d of host %s is open.\n", port, buf);
}
}
}
end = omp_get_wtime();
printf("Elapsed time = %f sec\n", end-start);
return 0;
}
答案 0 :(得分:1)
如评论中所述,您没有关闭套接字。您可以使用close,因为这是一个文件描述符。但是如果你扫描很多地址,如果连接失败并超时,那将是非常耗时的。 我正在修改你的代码:
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
#include <netdb.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <arpa/inet.h>
int connect_nonblock (int sockfd, const struct sockaddr *saptr, socklen_t salen)
{
int n, valopt;
socklen_t len;
fd_set rset;
struct timeval tv;
long int arg;
arg = fcntl(sockfd, F_GETFL, NULL);
arg |= O_NONBLOCK;
fcntl(sockfd, F_SETFL, arg);
n = connect(sockfd, saptr, salen);
if (n == 0) {
/* completed immediately */
arg &= (~O_NONBLOCK);
fcntl(sockfd, F_SETFL, arg);
close(sockfd);
return 0;
}
if (n < 0) {
if (errno != EINPROGRESS) {
/* fail somehow... */
arg &= (~O_NONBLOCK);
fcntl(sockfd, F_SETFL, arg);
close(sockfd);
return -1;
}
else {
tv.tv_sec = 0;
tv.tv_usec = 10000;
FD_ZERO(&rset);
FD_SET(sockfd, &rset);
n = select(sockfd + 1, NULL, &rset, NULL, &tv);
if (n < 0 && errno != EINTR) {
arg &= (~O_NONBLOCK);
fcntl(sockfd, F_SETFL, arg);
close(sockfd);
return -1;
}
else if (n > 0) {
len = sizeof(int);
getsockopt(sockfd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ERROR, (void*)(&valopt), &len);
if (valopt != 0) {
arg &= (~O_NONBLOCK);
fcntl(sockfd, F_SETFL, arg);
close(sockfd);
return -1;
}
}
else {
arg &= (~O_NONBLOCK);
fcntl(sockfd, F_SETFL, arg);
close(sockfd);
return -1;
}
}
}
arg &= (~O_NONBLOCK);
fcntl(sockfd, F_SETFL, arg);
close(sockfd);
return 0;
}
int main(void)
{
int sockfd = 0, n = 0;
char recv_buff[1024];
struct sockaddr_in serv_addr;
int i, port;
char buf[15];
memset(recv_buff, '0', sizeof(recv_buff));
for (i = 1; i < 255; i++) {
sprintf(buf, "192.168.88.%d", i); // puts string into buffer
for (port = 0; port <= 1024; port++) {
if ((sockfd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0)) < 0)
{
perror("socket");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
memset(&serv_addr, 0, sizeof(serv_addr));
serv_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
serv_addr.sin_port = htons(port);
serv_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = inet_addr(buf);
if (connect_nonblock(sockfd, (struct sockaddr *)&serv_addr, sizeof(serv_addr)) < 0)
{
printf("The port %d of host %s is not open \n", port, buf);
} else {
printf("The port %d of host %s is open \n", port, buf);
}
// you missed this
close(sockfd);
}
}
return 0;
}
我正在使用带有非常小的超时和线程的select添加非阻塞方法。应该重新制作,因为很多错误检查都没有以正确的方式完成。但希望你能得到这个想法。
答案 1 :(得分:0)
我建议:
运行流套接字时有几个问题:它们的数量是有限的。旧的实现无法在每个接口上打开超过65K的套接字。较新的可以做得更好,但仍然有很多资源(因为你计划完全扫描260 + K套接字)。
流套接字没有同步操作(默认情况下)。打开和关闭操作都会启动一系列数据包,以便两端都能够识别。当然,您可以将它们强制执行,但这可能会给您的算法带来问题,因为内核仍然会为那些不正确终止的连接接收数据包。
即使您扫描本地网络,尝试连接的时间也可能相当高,因为远程主机可能会禁用ICMP响应。
因此,该算法可能如下所示:
while (true)
{
while (size_of_socket_table < N && has_more_addr())
{
Create socket entry
Create socket
Mark operation expiration time
Initiate connect operation
if fail
{
continue
}
Add entry to table
Register entry for `pollfd`
}
If entry table is empty
break
Compute timeout from socket entries
Execute EPOLL with timeout
Process connected sockets:
close
release socket entries
Process timed out socket entries
close
release socket entries
}
注意:当文件描述符准备好写入时,流套接字已连接(EPOLLOUT
)。
为什么epoll
vs poll
vs select
?
epoll
允许将用户数据与文件描述符(套接字)相关联,这对编程非常方便。select
不太好,因为您必须处理FD_SET大小限制,并且无论如何都使用poll
。poll
既好又稳定,但这是您的选择。有用的链接: