我是ScalaMock的新手和一般的嘲笑。我试图测试一个方法,该方法在另一个(模拟的)类中调用一个方法,然后在返回的对象上调用一个方法。
详细信息:
所以我使用的是ScalaTest,这个测试涉及五个类......
我正在测试的SubInstruction
class SubInstruction(label: String, val result: Int, val op1: Int, val op2: Int) extends Instruction(label, "sub") {
override def execute(m: Machine) {
val value1 = m.regs(op1)
val value2 = m.regs(op2)
m.regs(result) = value1 - value2
}
}
object SubInstruction {
def apply(label: String, result: Int, op1: Int, op2: Int) =
new SubInstruction(label, result, op1, op2)
}
必须模拟测试的机器
case class Machine(labels: Labels, prog: Vector[Instruction]) {
private final val NUMBEROFREGISTERS = 32
val regs: Registers = new Registers(NUMBEROFREGISTERS)
override def toString(): String = {
prog.foldLeft("")(_ + _)
}
def execute(start: Int) =
start.until(prog.length).foreach(x => prog(x) execute this)
}
object Machine extends App {
if (args.length == 0) {
println("Machine: args should be sml code file to execute")
} else {
println("SML interpreter - Scala version")
val m = Translator(args(0)).readAndTranslate(new Machine(Labels(), Vector()))
println("Here is the program; it has " + m.prog.size + " instructions.")
println(m)
println("Beginning program execution.")
m.execute(0)
println("Ending program execution.")
println("Values of registers at program termination:")
println(m.regs + ".")
}
}
构建Machine对象所需的注册
case class Registers(size: Int) {
val registers: Array[Int] = new Array(size)
override def toString(): String =
registers.mkString(" ")
def update(k: Int, v: Int) = registers(k) = v
def apply(k: Int) = registers(k)
}
我作为原始Machine类创建的MockableMachine没有空构造函数,因此(据我所知)不能被模拟
class MockableMachine extends Machine(Labels(), Vector()){
}
最后是我的测试类SubInstructionTest,它编译但会抛出下面的异常。
class SubInstructionTest extends FlatSpec with MockFactory with Matchers {
val label1 = "f0"
val result1 = 25
val op1_1 = 24
val op2_1 = 20
val sub1 = SubInstruction(label1, result1, op1_1, op2_1)
"A SubInstruction" should "retrieve the operands from the correct registers in the given machine " +
"when execute(m: Machine) is called, and perform the operation saving the " +
"result in the correct register." in {
val mockMachine = mock[MockableMachine]
inSequence {
(mockMachine.regs.apply _).expects(op1_1).returning(50)
(mockMachine.regs.apply _).expects(op2_1).returning(16)
(mockMachine.regs.update _).expects(result1, 34)
}
sub1.execute(mockMachine)
}
}
抛出:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodException:Registers.mock $ apply $ 0()
-
我一直在寻找一种直接的方式来嘲笑这个课几个小时,但什么都没发现。目前我已经确定了下面详述的解决方法,但我的印象是,模拟会为测试我的SubInstruction类提供一个不那么复杂的解决方案。
解决方法:
删除MockableMachine类并创建一个CustomMachine类,该类扩展Machine并用构造时提供的mockedRegisters替换寄存器值。
class CustomMachine (mockedRegister: Registers) extends Machine(Labels(), Vector()) {
override
val regs: Registers = mockedRegister
}
我作为原始创建的MockableRegisters类没有空构造函数,因此(据我所知)不能被模拟
class MockableRegisters extends Registers(32) {
}
和SubInstructionTest类以稍微不同的方式编写
class SubInstructionTest extends FlatSpec with MockFactory with Matchers {
val label1 = "f0"
val result1 = 25
val op1_1 = 24
val op2_1 = 20
val sub1 = SubInstruction(label1, result1, op1_1, op2_1)
"A SubInstruction" should "retrieve the operands from the correct registers in the given machine " +
"when execute(m: Machine) is called, and perform the operation saving the " +
"result in the correct register." in {
val mockRegisters = mock[MockableRegisters]
val machine = new CustomMachine(mockRegisters)
inSequence {
(mockRegisters.apply _).expects(op1_1).returning(50)
(mockRegisters.apply _).expects(op2_1).returning(16)
(mockRegisters.update _).expects(result1, 34)
}
sub1.execute(machine)
}
}
如上所示,这对我来说就像是一种解决方法,是不是有一种更简单的方法(可能与我原来的尝试相似)?
我刚刚提供了提问的基本代码,但您可以在GitHub account找到完整的代码。
答案 0 :(得分:1)
我不认为Scalamock会隐式支持模拟嵌套对象。您必须模拟第一次调用返回的对象,这就是您的工作示例。
FWIW,Mockito支持这一点。搜索RETURNS_DEEP_STUBS
。