我可以为常用方法创建方法别名:
func method1() {
fmt.Println("method1")
}
var Method1 = method1
但是对于方法接收器不能做同样的事情:
type Person struct {
Name string
}
func (p *Person) methodReciver() {
fmt.Println("method reciver")
}
var MethodReciver = methodReciver
在这种情况下,我在第var MethodReciver = methodReciver
行上收到错误:
undefined: methodReciver
完整代码:
package main
import (
"fmt"
)
type Person struct {
Name string
}
func method1() {
fmt.Println("method1")
}
var Method1 = method1
func (p *Person) methodReceiver() {
fmt.Println("method receiver")
}
var MethodReceiver = methodReceiver
func main() {
method1()
Method1()
p := Person{"Nick"}
p.methodReceiver()
p.MethodReceiver()
}
是否可以为methodReceiver
创建方法别名?
答案 0 :(得分:23)
基本上你有两个选择:
其形式为ReceiverType.MethodName
,它产生一个函数类型的值:
var MethodReceiver = (*Person).methodReceiver
MethodReceiver
只保存函数引用,但不接收器,所以如果你想调用它,你还必须传递一个接收器(类型*Person
)到它作为第一个论点:
var p = &Person{"Alice"}
MethodReceiver(p) // Receiver is explicit: p
其格式为x.MethodName
,其中表达式x
具有静态类型T
:
var p = &Person{"Bob"}
var MethodReceiver2 = p.methodReceiver
方法值也会存储接收器,因此当您调用它时,您不必将接收器传递给它:
MethodReceiver2() // Receiver is implicit: p
在Go Playground上试用。
type Person struct {
Name string
}
func (p *Person) printName() {
fmt.Println(p.Name)
}
var PrintName1 = (*Person).printName
func main() {
var p1 *Person = &Person{"Bob"}
PrintName1(p1) // Have to specify receiver explicitly: p1
p2 := &Person{"Alice"}
var PrintName2 = p2.printName // Method value, also stores p2
PrintName2() // Implicit receiver: p2
}
输出:
Bob
Alice
答案 1 :(得分:9)
是。您可以创建这样的别名:
var MethodReceiver = (*Person).methodReceiver
当你调用它时,你必须提供一个指向person对象的指针作为第一个参数:
MethodReceiver(&p)
答案 2 :(得分:0)
这称为method expression var MethodReceiver = (*Person).methodReceiver