我正在研究一个Rails模板,并试图编写一些代码,允许我填充一个表或多列ul标签“从上到下”和“从左到右”然而不是很多我指定的列。我刚刚掌握了Ruby,所以我无法理解这一点。我也对这个有用的片段的惯用Haskell版本感到好奇。对Clojure版本的改进表示赞赏:
(defn table [xs & {:keys [cols direction]
:or {cols 1 direction 'right}}]
(into []
(condp = direction
'down (let [c (count xs)
q (int (/ c cols))
n (if (> (mod c q) 0) (inc q) q)]
(apply map vector (partition n n (repeat nil) xs)))
'right (map vec (partition cols cols (repeat nil) xs)))))
使用这段代码,我可以执行以下操作:
(table (range 10) :cols 3)
打印出来的情况如下:
0 1 2
3 4 5
6 7 8
9
更棘手的一个:
(table (range 10) :cols 3 :direction 'down)
看起来像这样:
0 4 8
1 5 9
2 6
3 7
答案 0 :(得分:4)
我无法读取clojure代码(我从未使用过该语言),但基于这些示例,我将在Ruby中执行此操作。
def table array, cols, direction
if direction==:down
if array.size%cols != 0
array[(array.size/cols+1)*cols-1]=nil
#putting nil in the last space in the array
#also fills all of the spaces before it
end
newarray=array.each_slice(array.size/cols).to_a
table newarray.transpose.flatten(1), cols, :across
elsif direction==:across
array.each_slice(cols) do |row|
puts row.join(" ")
end
else
raise ArgumentError
end
end
答案 1 :(得分:4)
我可能会在Haskell中使用Hackage中的Data.List.Split
包编写类似的东西:
import Data.List (intercalate, transpose)
import Data.List.Split (splitEvery)
data Direction = Horizontal | Vertical deriving (Eq, Read, Show)
table :: Direction -> Int -> [a] -> [[a]]
table Horizontal cols xs = splitEvery cols xs
table Vertical cols xs = let (q,r) = length xs `divMod` cols
q' = if r == 0 then q else q+1
in transpose $ table Horizontal q' xs
showTable :: Show a => [[a]] -> String
showTable = intercalate "\n" . map (intercalate "\t" . map show)
main :: IO ()
main = mapM_ putStrLn [ showTable $ table Horizontal 3 [0..9]
, "---"
, showTable $ table Vertical 3 [0..9] ]
其中一些内容,如Direction
类型和transpose
技巧,源于jkramer的回答。我不会在Haskell中使用关键字参数这样的东西(它实际上并没有这样的东西,但你可以使用Edward Kmett的答案中的记录来模拟它们),但是我把这些参数放在第一位,因为它对部分应用更有用(defaultTable = table Horizontal 1
)。 splitEvery
函数只是将列表分块到适当大小的列表中;其余的代码应该是直截了当的。 table
函数返回列表列表;要获取字符串,showTable
函数会插入制表符和换行符。 (intercalate
函数连接列表列表,用给定列表分隔它们。它类似于Perl / Python / Ruby的join
,仅用于列表而不仅仅是字符串。)
答案 2 :(得分:2)
这是我在Haskell中快速入侵的内容。我确定它有问题,可以进行优化,但这是开始的事情:
import System.IO
import Data.List
data Direction = Horizontal | Vertical
main = do
putStrLn $ table [1..9] 3 Horizontal
putStrLn "---"
putStrLn $ table [1..9] 3 Vertical
table xs ncol direction =
case direction of
Horizontal -> format (rows strings ncol)
Vertical -> format (columns strings ncol)
where
format = intercalate "\n" . map (intercalate " ")
strings = map show xs
rows xs ncol =
if length xs > ncol
then take ncol xs : rows (drop ncol xs) ncol
else [xs]
columns xs = transpose . rows xs
输出:
1 2 3
4 5 6
7 8 9
---
1 4 7
2 5 8
3 6 9
答案 3 :(得分:2)
我的红宝石溶液
def table(values)
elements = values[:elements]
cols = values[:cols]
rows = (elements.count / cols.to_f).ceil
erg = []
rows.times do |i|
cols.times do |j|
erg << elements[values[:direction] == 'down' ? i+(rows*j) : j+i*(rows-1)]
if erg.length == cols
yield erg
erg = []
end
end
end
yield erg
end
用法和输出:
table(:elements => [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9], :cols => 3) do |h,i,j|
puts h.to_s << " " << i.to_s << " " << j.to_s
end
puts "---"
table(:elements => [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9], :cols => 3, :direction => "down") do |h,i,j|
puts h.to_s << " " << i.to_s << " " << j.to_s
end
0 1 2
3 4 5
6 7 8
9
---
0 4 8
1 5 9
2 6
3 7
答案 4 :(得分:2)
切片和压缩提供了一个简单的Ruby解决方案:
def table(range, cols, direction=:right)
if direction == :right
range.each_slice cols
else
columns = range.each_slice((range.to_a.length - 1) / cols + 1).to_a
columns[0].zip *columns[1..-1]
end
end
puts table(0..9, 3, :down).map { |line| line.join ' ' }
答案 5 :(得分:1)
import Data.Array
stride :: Int -> Int -> Int
stride count cols = ceiling (fromIntegral count / fromIntegral cols)
type Direction = Int -> Int -> Int -> Int -> Int
right :: Direction
right count cols x y = y * cols + x
down :: Direction
down count cols x y = x * stride count cols + y
data Options = Options { cols :: Int, direction :: Direction }
options :: Options
options = Options 1 right
table :: Options -> [a] -> Array (Int,Int) (Maybe a)
table (Options cols dir) xs
= listArray newRange (map f (range newRange))
where count = length xs
rows = stride count cols
newRange = ((0,0),(rows-1,cols-1))
f (y, x)
| ix < count = Just (xs !! ix)
| otherwise = Nothing
where ix = dir count cols x y
这为我们提供了一个相当惯用的近似原始查询,并带有可选参数:
*Main> table options { cols = 3 } [1..10]
listArray ((0,0),(3,2)) [Just 1, Just 2, Just 3
,Just 4, Just 5, Just 6
,Just 7, Just 8, Just 9
,Just 10,Nothing,Nothing]
*Main> table options { direction = down, cols = 3 } [1..10]
listArray ((0,0),(3,2)) [Just 1,Just 5,Just 9
,Just 2,Just 6,Just 10
,Just 3,Just 7,Nothing
,Just 4,Just 8,Nothing]
我将中间结果保留为数组形式,因为您已表明他们计划将它们格式化为表格或ul标签。