给出两个大范围的数组...
A = [0..23, 30..53, 60..83, 90..113]
B = [-Float::INFINITY..13, 25..33, 45..53, 65..73, 85..93]
当我做logical conjuction ...
时C = A.mask(B)
然后我期待
describe "Array#mask" do
it{expect(C = A.mask(B)).to eq([0..13, 30..33, 45..53, 65..73, 90..93])}
end
感觉应该是......
C = A & B
=> []
但那是空的because none of the ranges are identical。
这是一个图例。
我已将Infinity纳入范围内,因为此问题的解决方案typically involve converting the Range to an Array or Set。
我的当前解决方案 这是我目前通过速度和准确度测试的解决方案。我正在寻找评论和/或建议的改进。第二个测试使用优秀的IceCube gem to generate an array of date ranges。在我的掩码方法中隐含的假设是每个调度中的日期范围出现不重叠。
require 'pry'
require 'rspec'
require 'benchmark'
require 'chronic'
require 'ice_cube'
require 'active_support'
require 'active_support/core_ext/numeric'
require 'active_support/core_ext/date/calculations'
A = [0..23, 30..53, 60..83, 90..113]
B = [-Float::INFINITY..13, 25..33, 45..53, 65..73, 85..93]
class Array
def mask(other)
a_down = self.map{|r| [:a, r.max]}
a_up = self.map{|r| [:a, r.min]}
b_down = other.map{|r| [:b, r.max]}
b_up = other.map{|r| [:b, r.min]}
up = a_up + b_up
down = a_down + b_down
a, b, start, result = false, false, nil, []
ticks = (up + down).sort_by{|i| i[1]}
ticks.each do |tick|
tick[0] == :a ? a = !a : b = !b
result << (start..tick[1]) if !start.nil?
start = a & b ? tick[1] : nil
end
return result
end
end
describe "Array#mask" do
context "simple integer array" do
it{expect(C = A.mask(B)).to eq([0..13, 30..33, 45..53, 65..73, 90..93])}
end
context "larger date ranges from IceCube schedule" do
it "should take less than 0.1 seconds" do
year = Time.now..(Time.now + 52.weeks)
non_premium_schedule = IceCube::Schedule.new(Time.at(0)) do |s|
s.duration = 12.hours
s.add_recurrence_rule IceCube::Rule.weekly.day(:monday, :tuesday, :wednesday, :thursday, :friday).hour_of_day(7).minute_of_hour(0)
end
rota_schedule = IceCube::Schedule.new(Time.at(0)) do |s|
s.duration = 7.hours
s.add_recurrence_rule IceCube::Rule.weekly(2).day(:tuesday).hour_of_day(15).minute_of_hour(30)
end
np = non_premium_schedule.occurrences_between(year.min, year.max).map{|d| d..d+non_premium_schedule.duration}
rt = rota_schedule.occurrences_between(year.min, year.max).map{|d| d..d+rota_schedule.duration}
expect(Benchmark.realtime{np.mask(rt)}).to be < 0.1
end
end
end
您可以使用Ruby的现有核心方法做到这一点感到奇怪吗?我错过了什么吗?我发现自己经常计算范围交叉点。
我还想到,您可以使用相同的方法通过传递单个项目数组来查找两个单一范围之间的交集。 e.g。
[(54..99)].mask[(65..120)]
我意识到我已经回答了我自己的问题,但我想我会把它作为其他人的参考。
答案 0 :(得分:1)
我不确定我真的理解你的问题;我对你的expect
语句感到有些困惑,我不知道为什么你的数组大小不一样。也就是说,如果你想计算两个范围的交集,我喜欢这个猴子补丁(来自Ruby: intersection between two ranges):
class Range
def intersection(other)
return nil if (self.max < other.begin or other.max < self.begin)
[self.begin, other.begin].max..[self.max, other.max].min
end
alias_method :&, :intersection
end
然后你可以这样做:
A = [0..23, 30..53, 60..83, 0..0, 90..113]
B = [-Float::INFINITY..13, 25..33, 45..53, 65..73, 85..93]
A.zip(B).map { |x, y| x & y }
# => [0..13, 30..33, nil, nil, 90..93]
这似乎是一个合理的结果......
修改强>
如果您发布了上面发布的monkeypatch Range
,请执行以下操作:
# your initial data
A = [0..23, 30..53, 60..83, 90..113]
B = [-Float::INFINITY..13, 25..33, 45..53, 65..73, 85..93]
A.product(B).map {|x, y| x & y }.compact
# => [0..13, 30..33, 45..53, 65..73, 90..93]
您将获得指定的结果。不知道它如何比较性能,我不确定排序顺序......