我有一些数据要分类,但是我不能在这里发帖所以我做了一个类似的(但很愚蠢)数据的例子,(类似的属性和数据),我的内容:
@Relation Food
@Attribute Type { Healthy , Not_Healthy}
@Attribute Veggie {TRUE, FALSE}
@Attribute From { McDonalds , BurgerKing , Hardees , Somewhere , SomewhereElse }
@Attribute Size {Small , Large}
@Attribute WithBun {'y', 'n'}
@Attribute meat {'y', 'n'}
@Attribute Sauce {'y', 'n'}
@Attribute Syrup {'y', 'n'}
@Attribute Cheese {'y', 'n'}
@Attribute Mayo {'y', 'n'}
@Attribute Ketchup {'y', 'n'}
@Attribute Sweetner {'y', 'n'}
@Attribute Milk {'y', 'n'}
@Attribute Food_is { Burger, Ribs , Nuggets, Donuts , Hotdog, Pizza , Rice_Pudding , Steak , Fries, Fatty_food }
@data
Healthy ,TRUE, BurgerKing , Large, 'y', 'y', 'y', 'y', 'n', 'n', 'n', 'n', 'n' , Burger
Not_Healthy ,TRUE, McDonalds , Small , 'y', 'y', 'y', 'y', 'y', 'y', 'n', 'y', 'n' , Ribs
Healthy ,TRUE, McDonalds , Large, 'y','y', 'n', 'y', 'y', 'n', 'y', 'y', 'n' , Donuts
Not_Healthy ,FALSE, Hardees , Large , 'y','y', 'y', 'y', 'y', 'y', 'y', 'n', 'n', Hotdog
Not_Healthy ,TRUE, Somewhere , Small ,'y','y', 'y','y', 'y', 'y', 'y', 'n','n',Pizza
Healthy ,TRUE, SomewhereElse , Large , 'y', 'y', 'y', 'y', 'n', 'y', 'n', 'n', 'n',Pizza
Not_Healthy ,TRUE, McDonalds , Small , 'n','n','y','y','n','y','n','n','n', Donuts
Not_Healthy ,FALSE, Hardees , Large , 'n', 'y', 'y', 'n', 'n', 'y', 'n', 'n', 'n',Fries
Not_Healthy ,FALSE, Hardees , Large ,'n','y', 'y', 'y', 'n', 'y', 'n', 'n', 'y', Rice_Pudding
Not_Healthy ,FALSE, Hardees , Large, 'n', 'y', 'y', 'y', 'y', 'n', 'n', 'n', 'n', Steak
分类结果是:10个中有5个分类正确,树看起来像这样:
通过反思,我不是说(蔬菜应该是这个或那个)我的意思是树应该更深,应该包含更多的水平。
由于