Node module.exports模式 - 这是正确的吗?

时间:2014-12-16 10:21:31

标签: javascript node.js

我是JS的新手,我目前正在研究一个IRC机器人。我已经制作了以下模块,我想用它来创建机器人命令。

 /***
 * Module contains available bot commands including
 * access levels to view/utilise command and help text.
 * 
 * Usage example: commands.tg.play(payload);
 * 
***/
module.exports = commands = { 
  tg: {
    reg: '^[. - !]tg',
    help: 'some help text for tg',
    play: function(payload){tg(payload);}
  },
  help: {
    reg: '^[. - !]help',
    description: 'some help text for intel',
    play: function(payload){help(payload);}
  }

};

function tg(payload){
//Example: msg_route: pm msg_from: munkee msg_data: .tg munkee testing message via tg command msg_match: .tg msg_method: .          
  console.log("msg_route:" + payload.msg_route + ' msg_from: ' + payload.msg_from + ' msg_data: ' + payload.msg_data + ' msg_match: ' + payload.msg_match + ' msg_method: ' + payload.msg_method);
  return;
}

function help(payload){
var output='Available commands: ';
  for (var i in commands){
    output=output+ ' ' + i.toString();
  }
 return console.log(output);
}

正如您所看到的,我目前正在命令对象中定义一些方法。为了尝试让事情变得更清洁,我定义了在命令对象下面实际运行的函数。我可以通过commands.help.play(payload)轻松访问这些内容。但是我想知道是否有更好的方法来做到这一点,还是我正确的方向?目前这些命令非常具有骨架性,并且将会执行更多的工作,但我只是想发布一些内容来提供一般性的想法。

2 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:1)

这是我个人的偏好,但我会选择这个。单例模式与构造函数

 function Commands(){
    this.commands = {};
    this.tg = function (payload){
        //Example: msg_route: pm msg_from: munkee msg_data: .tg munkee testing message via tg command msg_match: .tg msg_method: .          
          console.log("msg_route:" + payload.msg_route + ' msg_from: ' + payload.msg_from + ' msg_data: ' + payload.msg_data + ' msg_match: ' + payload.msg_match + ' msg_method: ' + payload.msg_method);
          return;
        };



this.help = function (payload){
    var output='Available commands: ';
      for (var i in commands){
        output=output+ ' ' + i.toString();
      }
}
  this.commands.tg= {
    reg: '^[. - !]tg',
    help: 'some help text for tg',
    play: this.tg
  };
  this.commands.help= {
    reg: '^[. - !]help',
    description: 'some help text for intel',
    play: this.help
   };


}


if(!!obj)
obj = new Commands();

module.exports = obj;

答案 1 :(得分:1)

我不喜欢你正在制作的额外fn电话:play:function(payload){tg(payload);}应该只是play:tg,因为函数是js中的一阶公民。我也更喜欢在文件末尾分配module.exports。

/***
 * Module contains available bot commands including
 * access levels to view/utilise command and help text.
 * 
 * Usage example: commands.tg.play(payload);
 * 
***/

var commands = {};

function tg(payload){
//Example: msg_route: pm msg_from: munkee msg_data: .tg munkee testing message via tg command msg_match: .tg msg_method: .          
  console.log("msg_route:" + payload.msg_route + ' msg_from: ' + payload.msg_from + ' msg_data: ' + payload.msg_data + ' msg_match: ' + payload.msg_match + ' msg_method: ' + payload.msg_method);
  return;
}

function help(payload){
var output='Available commands: ';
  for (var i in commands){
    output=output+ ' ' + i.toString();
  }
 return console.log(output);
}


// export
module.exports = commands = { 
  tg: {
    reg: '^[. - !]tg',
    help: 'some help text for tg',
    play: tg;
  },
  help: {
    reg: '^[. - !]help',
    description: 'some help text for intel',
    play: help}
  }

};