当我自己运行这个子查询时:
select *
from (select rpt_nbr, iteration, seq_nbr, emp_id_key, rank() over
(partition by emp_id_key order by iteration, seq_nbr) rk
from SJTCAPP.LAB_RPT_SPEC_EMP where rpt_nbr = 1572413)
where rk = rownum
我得到了一个很好的结果,每次迭代只返回1 emp_id_key
seq_nbr
,即使可以分配多个emp_id_key
。但是,当我将其添加到我的查询的其余部分时,这很好:
select * from
SJTCAPP.LAB_RPT r
left join SJTCAPP.LAB_RPT_SPEC s on s.rpt_nbr = r.rpt_nbr
left join (select * from
(select rpt_nbr, iteration, seq_nbr, emp_id_key, rank() over (partition by emp_id_key order
by iteration, seq_nbr) rk from SJTCAPP.LAB_RPT_SPEC_EMP ) where rk = rownum)
se on se.rpt_nbr = s.rpt_nbr and se.seq_nbr = s.seq_nbr and se.iteration = s.iteration
left join sjtcapp.employee tech on tech.emp_id_key = se.emp_id_key
我为tech.emp_id_key join
获取了一个NULL值更新
select * from (select rpt_nbr, iteration, seq_nbr, emp_id_key, rank() over (partition by emp_id_key order by iteration, seq_nbr ) rk from SJTCAPP.LAB_RPT_SPEC_EMP where rpt_nbr = 1572413) where rk = rownum and rpt_nbr = 1572413
以上查询也提供了“好”的信息。结果。
RPT_NBR ITERATION SEQ_NBR EMP_ID_KEY RK
1572413 1 1 44746 1
1572413 1 2 44746 2
之前我在这里进行了更多简单的加入,并收到了具有各个技术人员姓名的正确查询。唯一的问题是,如果分配了多个,则会导致重复,这就是我添加等级子查询的原因。
答案 0 :(得分:0)
如果约束迭代并且seq_nbr是唯一的,则可以使用exists而不是rank
SELECT
rpt_nbr,
iteration,
seq_nbr,
emp_id_key
FROM
SJTCAPP.LAB_RPT_SPEC_EMP emp
WHERE
NOT EXISTS
(
SELECT
*
FROM
SJTCAPP.LAB_RPT_SPEC_EMP emp2
WHERE
emp2.emp_id_key = emp.emp_id_key AND
emp2.iteration < emp.iteration AND
emp2.seq_nbr < emp.seq_nbr
)
答案 1 :(得分:0)
我最终回到了使用GROUP BY
left join (
select min(rpt_nbr) as rpt_nbr, min(iteration) as iteration, min(seq_nbr) as seq_nbr, min(emp_id_key) as emp_id_key from LAB_RPT_SPEC_EMP group by rpt_nbr, iteration, seq_nbr
) se
on se.rpt_nbr = s.rpt_nbr and se.seq_nbr = s.seq_nbr and se.iteration = s.iteration