我正在运行一个非常简单的Undertow配置。整个代码包括:
public class HelloWorldUndertow {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Undertow undertow = Undertow.builder()
.addHttpListener(9090, "0.0.0.0")
.setHandler(new HttpHandler() {
@Override
public void handleRequest(HttpServerExchange exchange) throws Exception {
exchange.setResponseCode(200);
exchange.getResponseSender().send("hello!");
}
}).build();
undertow.start();
}
}
我尝试测试它可以处理的每秒请求数。我使用apache ab
工具进行测量:
ab -n 100000 -c 10 http://localhost:9090/test
我设法获得的最大数字是10000左右/秒:
Concurrency Level: 10
Time taken for tests: 10.664 seconds
Complete requests: 100000
Failed requests: 0
Total transferred: 10000000 bytes
HTML transferred: 600000 bytes
Requests per second: 9377.69 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 1.066 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 0.107 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 915.79 [Kbytes/sec] received
Connection Times (ms)
min mean[+/-sd] median max
Connect: 0 0 0.2 0 1
Processing: 0 1 0.5 1 11
Waiting: 0 1 0.5 1 11
Total: 0 1 0.5 1 11
Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
50% 1
66% 1
75% 1
80% 1
90% 2
95% 2
98% 2
99% 2
100% 11 (longest request)
我觉得它很大,但我在这种情况下是一个限制因素。它不是处理器(当使用Java Mission Control进行采样时应用程序运行低于20%)而不是内存。我在Windows上运行它 - 也许这就是原因?
答案 0 :(得分:1)
我无法告诉您如何在Windows中运行时使其性能更佳,但如果您在Linux中运行它,则可以在此处执行Jetty推荐的调优:http://www.eclipse.org/jetty/documentation/current/high-load.html 总结:
sysctl -w net.core.rmem_max=16777216
sysctl -w net.core.wmem_max=16777216
sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_rmem="4096 87380 16777216"
sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_wmem="4096 16384 16777216"
sysctl -w net.core.somaxconn=4096
sysctl -w net.core.netdev_max_backlog=16384
sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_max_syn_backlog=8192
sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_syncookies=1
sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range="1024 65535"
sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_tw_recycle=1
sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control=cubic
运行代码时包含-server
JVM参数。
然后尝试:
ab -n 100000 -c 100 http://localhost:9090/test
(使用100个连接发出100,000个请求)
当我在我的Windows7笔记本电脑(3岁)上运行在VMWare Player中的Linux vm中尝试时,我每秒会收到超过100,000个请求。