我正在努力完成编纂挑战,以提高我的编程技能,或者说缺乏编程技能。挑战的细节在这里。
在一个房间里有N条绳索和N个重量。每根绳子都连接着 正好一个重量(仅在一端),每根绳子都有一个特殊的重量 耐久性 - 它可以暂停的最大重量。还有一个 挂钩,附在天花板上。绳索可以连接到钩子上 通过绑定没有重量的结束。绳索也可以连接到 其他重量;也就是说,绳索和重物可以连接到一个 链中的另一个。如果连接的重量总和,绳子将断裂 它直接或间接地大于它的耐久性。
我们知道我们想要附加N条绳索的顺序。更确切地说, 我们知道绳子的参数(耐久性和重量)和 每个附件的位置。耐久性,重量和位置是 在三个零索引数组A,B,C中给出长度为N.对于每个I(0 ≤I< N):A [I]是第I条绳索的耐久性,B [I]是重量 连接到第I条绳索,C [I](使得C [I]
A= [4,3,1] B = [2,2,1] C = [-1,0,1]
该功能应该返回2,好像我们连接第三根绳子然后一根绳子会断裂,因为重量总和大于它 耐久性(2 + 2 + 1 = 5和5> 4)。
以下是我尝试的解决方案。我有一个名为add_weights的辅助函数,如果添加最新的绳索不会导致任何其他绳索断裂,则返回True,否则返回false。
def add_weights(A, ancestors, weights, weight, rope):
#add weight(int) to rope and ancestors
if (rope == -1):
return (True)
else:
weights[rope] += weight
if (A[rope] < weights[rope]):
print "Rope that breaks", rope
return False
ancestor = ancestors[rope]
print ancestor
add_weights(A, ancestors, weights, weight, ancestor)
def solution(A, B, C):
# write your code in Python 2.7
weights = {}
ancestors = {}
for i in range(len(B)):
weights[i] = B[i]
for i in range(len(C)):
#attaching rope i to rope x
x = C[i]
ancestors[i] = x
broke = add_weights(A, ancestors, weights, B[i], x)
if (not broke):
return i
return len(C)
问题是在函数解决方案的for循环的第二次迭代期间(当我尝试添加绳索1时),变量break以某种方式评估为None,当我可以清楚地看到add_weights返回True时。我也用调试器对它进行了测试,所以我不完全确定发生了什么。欢迎任何帮助。
答案 0 :(得分:0)
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace Exercise5_DurablityofRopes
{
class Program
{
static int[] A_Durability = new int[] { 15, 6, 2,3,1 };
static int[] B_Weight = new int[] { 2, 1, 2,3,1 };
static int[] C_Position = new int[] { -1, 0, 1 ,2,3};
static int no_of_ropes_attached = 0;
static int maxropeattached = 0;
static void Main(string[] args)
{
// first position cannot necessarily be -1 hence Checking for each position How many maximum ropes can be attached
for (int i = 0; i <= C_Position.Length - 1; i++)
{
int[] Copy_Durability = new int[A_Durability.Length];
for (int l = 0; l <= C_Position.Length - 1; l++)
{
Copy_Durability[l] = A_Durability[l];
}
AddNextRope(i, B_Weight[i], Copy_Durability);
Console.WriteLine("Total Number of ropes can be attached to " + C_Position[i] + " ropes are" + no_of_ropes_attached);
if (no_of_ropes_attached>=maxropeattached)
{
maxropeattached = no_of_ropes_attached;
}
no_of_ropes_attached = 0;
}
Console.WriteLine("Total Number of ropes can be attached is " + maxropeattached);
Console.ReadKey();
}
private static void AddNextRope(int currentRopePosition,int newWeight,int[] Durability)
{
if (currentRopePosition == C_Position.Length - 1) return;
// decrease same amount of weight from all ansestors from their durability and check if any of them breaks (durability <0) with new weight added
for (int k = currentRopePosition; k != 0; k--)
{
Durability[k] = Durability[k] - newWeight;
if(Durability[k]<0)
{
return;
}
}
no_of_ropes_attached = no_of_ropes_attached + 1;
for (int i = 0; i <= C_Position.Length - 1; i++)
{
if (C_Position[i] == C_Position[currentRopePosition] + 1)
{
if (A_Durability[i] > B_Weight[i])
{
AddNextRope(i, B_Weight[i], Durability);
}
else
{
return;
}
}
}
}
}
}
答案 1 :(得分:0)
我已经完成了一个解决方案,但它不是n(log n),并且它在最后一次线性测试中失败了很多。
def solution(A, B, C):
num_ropes = len(C)
for i in xrange(num_ropes):
node = i
while(node != -1):
A[node] -= B[i]
if A[node] < 0:
return i
node = C[node]
return num_ropes
可以使用最后一部分进行测试
if __name__ == '__main__':
A = [5, 3, 6, 3, 3]
B = [2, 3, 1, 1, 2]
C = [-1, 0, -1, 0, 3]
assert solution(A, B, C) == 3
A = [4, 3, 1]
B = [2, 2, 1]
C = [-1, 0, 1]
assert solution(A, B, C) == 2
答案 2 :(得分:0)
我没有时间将其翻译成Python,但您可以通过查看此JS代码获得一个想法:
function keysOrderedByValues(array) {
var result = [];
for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
result[array[i] + 1] = i;
}
return result;
}
function findFirstPositiveElem(array) {
for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
if (array[i]>0) {
return i;
}
}
return null;
}
function accumulativeArray(array) {
var result = [];
var sum = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
sum = sum + array[i];
result.push(sum);
}
return result;
}
Array.prototype.indexedByArray = function(array) {
result = [];
for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
result.push(this[array[i]])
}
return result;
}
function test(ds, ws, ords) {
return findFirstPositiveElem(ws.indexedByArray(keysOrderedByValues(ords)), ds);
}
console.log(test([4,3,1], [2,2,1], [-1,0,1]))
答案 3 :(得分:-1)
忘记提及:这是O(n)和数组B2的一些空间复杂性
int Solution (int[]A, int[] B, int[] C)
{
if (A==null || B==null || C==null)
return -1;
if (A.Length==0 || B.Length==0 || C.Length==0)
return -1;
if (A.Length != B.Length && A.Length != C.Length)
return -1;
var bLen=B.Count();
var B2 = new int[bLen];
for (int i = 0; i < bLen; i++)
B2[i]=(i==0? 0 : B2[i-1]) + B[i]; //cumulative sum
var ret=-1;
var skip=0;
for (int i = 0; i < A.Length; i++)
{
skip=C[i]+1;
if (A[i] - (B2[bLen-1] - (skip>0 ? B2[skip-1] : 0)) < 0)
{
ret=bLen-skip-1;
break;
}
}
return ret;
}