我自下而上构建二叉树时遇到问题。 树的输入将是树的内部节点,该节点的子节点是最终树的叶子。
因此,如果树为空,则根将是第一个内部节点。
之后,要添加的下一个内部节点将是新的根(NR),其中旧的根(OR)是NR的子节点之一。等等。
我遇到的问题是,无论何时我添加一个NR,当我进行inOrder遍历时,OR的子节点似乎都会丢失。事实证明,当我执行getSize()调用时,在addNode(Tree,Node)之前和之后返回相同数量的节点
赞赏解决此问题的任何帮助
编辑时包含节点类代码。 树和节点类都有addChild方法,因为我不太确定将它们放在哪里以供它使用。任何对此的评论也将受到赞赏。
代码如下:
import java.util.*;
public class Tree {
Node root;
int size;
public Tree() {
root = null;
}
public Tree(Node root) {
this.root = root;
}
public static void setChild(Node parent, Node child, double weight) throws ItemNotFoundException {
if (parent.child1 != null && parent.child2 != null) {
throw new ItemNotFoundException("This Node already has 2 children");
} else if (parent.child1 != null) {
parent.child2 = child;
child.parent = parent;
parent.c2Weight = weight;
} else {
parent.child1 = child;
child.parent = parent;
parent.c1Weight = weight;
}
}
public static void setChild1(Node parent, Node child) {
parent.child1 = child;
child.parent = parent;
}
public static void setChild2(Node parent, Node child) {
parent.child2 = child;
child.parent = parent;
}
public static Tree addNode(Tree tree, Node node) throws ItemNotFoundException {
Tree tree1;
if (tree.root == null) {
tree.root = node;
} else if (tree.root.getSeq().equals(node.getChild1().getSeq()) ||
tree.root.getSeq().equals(node.getChild2().getSeq())) {
Node oldRoot = tree.root;
oldRoot.setParent(node);
tree.root = node;
} else { //form a disjoint tree and merge the 2 trees
tree1 = new Tree(node);
tree = mergeTree(tree, tree1);
}
System.out.print("addNode2 = ");
if(tree.root != null ) {
Tree.inOrder(tree.root);
}
System.out.println();
return tree;
}
public static Tree mergeTree(Tree tree, Tree tree1) {
String root = "root";
Node node = new Node(root);
tree.root.setParent(node);
tree1.root.setParent(node);
tree.root = node;
return tree;
}
public static int getSize(Node root) {
if (root != null) {
return 1 + getSize(root.child1) + getSize(root.child2);
} else {
return 0;
}
}
public static boolean isEmpty(Tree Tree) {
return Tree.root == null;
}
public static void inOrder(Node root) {
if (root != null) {
inOrder(root.child1);
System.out.print(root.sequence + " ");
inOrder(root.child2);
}
}
}
Node root;
int size;
public Tree() {
root = null;
}
public Tree(Node root) {
this.root = root;
}
public static void setChild(Node parent, Node child, double weight) throws ItemNotFoundException {
if (parent.child1 != null && parent.child2 != null) {
throw new ItemNotFoundException("This Node already has 2 children");
} else if (parent.child1 != null) {
parent.child2 = child;
child.parent = parent;
parent.c2Weight = weight;
} else {
parent.child1 = child;
child.parent = parent;
parent.c1Weight = weight;
}
}
public static void setChild1(Node parent, Node child) {
parent.child1 = child;
child.parent = parent;
}
public static void setChild2(Node parent, Node child) {
parent.child2 = child;
child.parent = parent;
}
public static Tree addNode(Tree tree, Node node) throws ItemNotFoundException {
Tree tree1;
if (tree.root == null) {
tree.root = node;
} else if (tree.root.getSeq().equals(node.getChild1().getSeq()) ||
tree.root.getSeq().equals(node.getChild2().getSeq())) {
Node oldRoot = tree.root;
oldRoot.setParent(node);
tree.root = node;
} else { //form a disjoint tree and merge the 2 trees
tree1 = new Tree(node);
tree = mergeTree(tree, tree1);
}
System.out.print("addNode2 = ");
if(tree.root != null ) {
Tree.inOrder(tree.root);
}
System.out.println();
return tree;
}
public static Tree mergeTree(Tree tree, Tree tree1) {
String root = "root";
Node node = new Node(root);
tree.root.setParent(node);
tree1.root.setParent(node);
tree.root = node;
return tree;
}
public static int getSize(Node root) {
if (root != null) {
return 1 + getSize(root.child1) + getSize(root.child2);
} else {
return 0;
}
}
public static boolean isEmpty(Tree Tree) {
return Tree.root == null;
}
public static void inOrder(Node root) {
if (root != null) {
inOrder(root.child1);
System.out.print(root.sequence + " ");
inOrder(root.child2);
}
}
public class Node {
}
Node child1;
Node child2;
Node parent;
double c1Weight;
double c2Weight;
String sequence;
boolean isInternal;
public Node(String seq) {
sequence = seq;
child1 = null;
c1Weight = 0;
child2 = null;
c2Weight = 0;
parent = null;
isInternal = false;
}
public boolean hasChild() {
if (this.child1 == null && this.child2 == null) {
this.isInternal = false;
return isInternal;
} else {
this.isInternal = true;
return isInternal;
}
}
public String getSeq() throws ItemNotFoundException {
if (this.sequence == null) {
throw new ItemNotFoundException("No such node");
} else {
return this.sequence;
}
}
public void setChild(Node child, double weight) throws ItemNotFoundException {
if (this.child1 != null && this.child2 != null) {
throw new ItemNotFoundException("This Node already has 2 children");
} else if (this.child1 != null) {
this.child2 = child;
this.c2Weight = weight;
} else {
this.child1 = child;
this.c1Weight = weight;
}
}
public static void setChild1(Node parent, Node child) {
parent.child1 = child;
child.parent = parent;
}
public static void setChild2(Node parent, Node child) {
parent.child2 = child;
child.parent = parent;
}
public void setParent(Node parent){
this.parent = parent;
}
public Node getParent() throws ItemNotFoundException {
if (this.parent == null) {
throw new ItemNotFoundException("This Node has no parent");
} else {
return this.parent;
}
}
public Node getChild1() throws ItemNotFoundException {
if (this.child1 == null) {
throw new ItemNotFoundException("There is no child1");
} else {
return this.child1;
}
}
public Node getChild2() throws ItemNotFoundException {
if (this.child2 == null) {
throw new ItemNotFoundException("There is no child2");
} else {
return this.child2;
}
}
答案 0 :(得分:1)
仅查看附加的代码,找不到明确的setChild
被调用,只有setParent
。如果您还附加了setParent
的代码,那么我们可以确认该方法是否也创建了从父级到子级的反向链接。
我的猜测是setParent
不会setChild
,在这种情况下,孩子们的链接并没有丢失:它们从未被制作过。
//编辑后:
好的,现在确认setParent
没有setChild
,所以你从来没有做过这些链接。你应该扩充表单的所有调用:
someNode.setParent(otherNode);
还要:
otherNode.setChild(someNode);
其他评论:
setChild
可以通过调用setChild1
和setChild2
来减少重复性。setChild
中哪个链接可以自由使用的逻辑是正确的,但令人困惑,即“如果另一个链接不是免费的,那么使用这个”,而不是更直接的“如果这个是免费的,只需使用它。“tree1
中的addNode
可以在使用它的一个块内声明。事实上,它甚至可以完全写出代码,例如tree = merge(tree, new Tree(node));
。node.getChild1().getSeq()
是否容易导致NullPointerException
被抛出?
ItemNotFoundException
。在任何一种情况下,addNode
中的原始条件都是错误的,因为您无法保证两个孩子都存在(因为那时您将无法为其添加子项)。Node.setChild*
Tree
中的static
功能复制为{{1}}方法...然后不使用其中任何一种?