JSBin示例: http://jsbin.com/yuyetakonowu/1/edit?html,js,output
摘要: 我有两个指令(myParentDirective和myChildDirective)。 myParentDirective转换myChildDirective内容。我试图在myChildDirective中双向绑定模型对象。当我"更新"它成功运作通过简单地将属性更改或添加到现有对象实例来对象。但是,当我"分配"一个新对象(使用来自控制器的超时运算符的超时函数)myChildDirective将不会被更新。
HTML :
<html ng-app='ValidationApp'>
<head>
<title>Assigning a model object after isolated scope is set doesn't work</title>
</head>
<body ng-controller='MyController'>
<h2>MyController.assignedObject: {{assignedObject}}</h2>
<h2>MyController.updatedObject: {{updatedObject}}</h2>
<my-parent-directive assigned-object='assignedObject' updated-object='updatedObject'>
<my-child-directive></my-child-directive>
</my-parent-directive>
<script src='//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.3.0-beta.17/angular.js'></script>
<script src='app.js'></script>
</body>
</html>
的JavaScript :
var app = angular.module('ValidationApp', [])
app.controller('MyController', [
'$scope',
'$http',
function($scope, $http) {
// Model objects loaded on page-load
$scope.assignedObject = {value: 'pre-update'}
$scope.updatedObject = {value: 'pre-update'}
// Mock ajax request
setTimeout(function() {
// This is what I'm ultimately trying to accomplish. However, myChildDirective is not properly
// showing the updated value 'post-update'.
$scope.assignedObject = {value: "post-update"}
// I noticed that this line will properly update myChildDirective, but it's not an ideal solution.
// I'm including it in the example just to show the inconsistent results in myChildDirective.
$scope.updatedObject.value = "post-update"
$scope.$apply()
}, 1000)
}
])
app.directive('myParentDirective', function() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
transclude: true,
scope: {
assignedObject: '=',
updatedObject: '='
},
template: '\
<h2>myParentDirective.assignedObject: {{assignedObject}}</h2>\
<h2>myParentDirective.updatedObject: {{updatedObject}}</h2>\
<div ng-transclude></div>\
',
controller: function($scope, $element) {
this.assignedObject = $scope.assignedObject
this.updatedObject = $scope.updatedObject
}
}
})
app.directive('myChildDirective', function() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
require: '^myParentDirective',
scope: false,
template: '\
<h2>myChildDirective.myParentDirective.assignedObject: {{myParentDirective.assignedObject}}</h2>\
<h2>myChildDirective.myParentDirective.updatedObject: {{myParentDirective.updatedObject}}</h2>\
',
link: function($scope, $element, $attrs, myParentDirective) {
$scope.myParentDirective = myParentDirective
}
}
})
答案 0 :(得分:2)
我找到了一些解决问题的方法......
问题在于我将$ scope.assignedObject分配给myParentDirective中的this.assignedObject。当我这样做时,myChildDirective无法知道属性何时发生变化。通常,将调用$ scope。$ apply()函数来通知所有观察者范围属性已更改,但由于我重新将此对象引用分配给this.assignedObject,myChildDirective永远不会收到该事件。
最简单的解决方案可以在这里找到:http://jsbin.com/yuyetakonowu/11/edit。基本上,这只是继承父作用域,这样我就可以依靠有角度的作用域来发出相应的事件并相应地更新myChildDirective。
然而,这对我来说还不够好,因为我还需要myChildDirective来拥有一个具有自己属性的独立范围。这意味着我不能简单地继承&#34;父范围。我已通过以下方式解决了此问题:http://jsbin.com/yuyetakonowu/9/edit。
最终结果:
HTML:
<html ng-app='ValidationApp'>
<head>
<title>Assigning a model object after isolated scope is set doesn't work</title>
</head>
<body ng-controller='MyController'>
<h1>MyController</h1>
<h2>assignedObject: {{assignedObject}}</h2>
<h2>updatedObject: {{updatedObject}}</h2>
<my-parent-directive assigned-object='assignedObject' updated-object='updatedObject'>
<my-child-directive child-property='child-property-value'></my-child-directive>
</my-parent-directive>
<script src='//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.3.0-beta.17/angular.js'></script>
<script src='app.js'></script>
</body>
</html>
JavaScript的:
var app = angular.module('ValidationApp', [])
app.controller('MyController', [
'$scope',
'$http',
function($scope, $http) {
// Model objects loaded on page-load
$scope.assignedObject = {value: 'pre-update'}
$scope.updatedObject = {value: 'pre-update'}
// Mock ajax request
setTimeout(function() {
// This is what I'm ultimately trying to accomplish. However, myChildDirective is not properly
// showing the updated value 'post-update'.
$scope.assignedObject = {value: "post-update"}
// I noticed that this line will properly update myChildDirective, but it's not an ideal solution.
// I'm including it in the example just to show the inconsistent results in myChildDirective.
$scope.updatedObject.value = "post-update"
$scope.$apply()
}, 1000)
}
])
app.directive('myParentDirective', function() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
transclude: true,
scope: {
assignedObject: '=',
updatedObject: '='
},
template: '\
<h1>myParentDirective</h1>\
<h2>assignedObject: {{assignedObject}}</h2>\
<h2>updatedObject: {{updatedObject}}</h2>\
<div ng-transclude></div>\
',
controller: function($scope, $element) {
// Generally, exposing isolate scope is considered bad practice. However, this directive is intended
// to be used with child directives which explicitly depend on this directive. In addition, child
// directives will likely need their own isolated scope with two-way binding of properties on this scope.
this._scope = $scope
}
}
})
app.directive('myChildDirective', function() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
require: '^myParentDirective',
scope: {
childProperty: '@'
},
template: '\
<h1>myChildDirective</h1>\
<h2>childProperty: {{childProperty}}</h2>\
<h2>assignedObject: {{assignedObject}}</h2>\
<h2>updatedObject: {{updatedObject}}</h2>\
',
link: function($scope, $element, $attrs, myParentDirective) {
myParentDirective._scope.$watch('assignedObject', function(newValue, oldValue) {
$scope.assignedObject = newValue
})
myParentDirective._scope.$watch('updatedObject', function(newValue, oldValue) {
$scope.updatedObject = newValue
})
}
}
})