更新: 我设法通过更新来进一步缩小问题范围并修复 意外请求 错误包含一些无效的ascii字符的 httpBackend.when 请求。
我已经附加了Plunker当前代码块。
但是我仍然难以有效地测试触发成功和错误方法操作。我还需要增加期望来检查消息广播。
为了测试上面提到的场景,我设计了一个我在Plunker中包含的黑客,但我相信应该有更好的方法来测试这些场景。
我将非常感谢任何有关如何克服此问题并测试响应消息状态的线索。
问题
我为我的测试设置了$ httpBackend的预期值/响应,但是当我运行$ httpBackend.flush()时,它无法指示下面提到的错误。
显示错误消息
Error: Unexpected request: GET https://192.168.1.10:3334/res?t1=CHECK&t2='?'&req={"_msgType":"Login_msg","UserName":"e@e.com","Password":"123"}
我确实找到了一些讨论这个问题域的有用链接,他们确实帮我缩小了问题范围。但我仍然无法弄清楚这个单元测试失败的具体原因。
有用的堆栈溢出问题
有用的外部资源
我还尝试了moving the flush() call around,并在测试中按照此处的建议启动$ http请求时尝试calling $apply or $digest。
要测试的AngularJS服务
app.service('restService',['$log','$http','$rootScope',function($log,$http,$rootScope)
{
this.location = null;
this.port = null;
this.sendRequest = function(host,port,param1,param2,requestMsg)
{
this.location = host;
this.port = port;
$http.get('https://'+host+":"+port+"/res?t1="+param1+"&t2="+param2+"&req="+JSON.stringify(requestMsg)).
success(function(data) {
//Need to add expectations to check success operations
$log.log('response received',data);
var msgData = data;
$rootScope.successCalled = true;
$rootScope.response = data;
if(msgData.hasOwnProperty('_msgType'))
{
$log.log('broadcast for channel',msgData._msgType);
$rootScope.$broadcast(msgData._msgType,msgData);
}
}).
error(function(){
//Need to add expectations to check error method operations
var httpErrMsg = {_msgType:'HTTPErr', host:host, port:port, t1:param1, t2:param2, requestMsg:requestMsg};
$rootScope.errorCalled = true;
$rootScope.response = data;
$rootScope.$broadcast(httpErrMsg._msgType,httpErrMsg);
});
}
this.getIP = function()
{
return this.location;
}
this.getPort = function()
{
return this.port;
}
}])
用于测试服务的规范
"use strict";
describe("Rest service test", function()
{
var $scope, $location, httpBackend, $log, restService , loginMsg ;
beforeEach(module('app'));
beforeEach(inject(function (_restService_)
{
restService = _restService_;
}));
beforeEach(inject(function($rootScope, _$location_, $httpBackend, _$log_)
{
$scope = $rootScope.$new();
$location = _$location_;
httpBackend = $httpBackend;
$log = _$log_;
loginMsg={ _msgType:"Login_msg", UserName:"e@e.com", Password:"123"};
}));
afterEach(function()
{
httpBackend.verifyNoOutstandingExpectation();
httpBackend.verifyNoOutstandingRequest();
});
describe("Service : Rest Service", function()
{
it('Should start with location and port undefined', function() {
expect(restService.location).toEqual(null);
expect(restService.port).toEqual(null);
});
it("check if method exists", function() {
expect(restService.sendRequest).toBeDefined();
});
it("GetIP method Exists ", function()
{
expect(restService.getIP).toBeDefined();
});
it("GetPort method Exists ", function()
{
expect(restService.getPort).toBeDefined();
});
it("GetIP Value ", function()
{
restService.location = '192.168.1.10';
expect(restService.location).toEqual('192.168.1.10');
});
it("GetPort Value ", function()
{
restService.port = '3334';
expect(restService.port).toEqual('3334');
});
it("Execute sendRequest()", function() {
httpBackend.when('GET', 'https://192.168.1.10:3334/res?t1=CHECK&t2=\'?\'&req={"_msgType":"Login_msg","UserName":"e@e.com","Password":"123"}')
.respond ({SessionId:"2103337586",Status:"user e@e.com not found ",EMail:"e@e.com",rejectCode:1,rejectReason:"Invalid username or password",_msgType:"LoginReply_msg"});
restService.sendRequest("192.168.1.10","3334","CHECK","'?'",loginMsg);
httpBackend.flush();
expect(restService.location).toEqual('192.168.1.10');
expect(restService.port).toEqual('3334');
expect($scope.successCalled).toBe(true);
expect($scope.response).not.toBe(null);
expect($scope.response._msgType).toEqual('LoginReply_msg');
});
});
});
答案 0 :(得分:1)
我知道,这个问题很老,但也许有人在寻找,这可能会有所帮助。
修改你的beforeEach函数,如下所示:
beforeEach(inject(function($rootScope, _$location_, $httpBackend, _$log_)
{
$scope = $rootScope.$new();
$location = _$location_;
httpBackend = $httpBackend;
$log = _$log_;
loginMsg={ _msgType:"Login_msg", UserName:"e@e.com", Password:"123"};
httpBackend.expectGET(/192.168.1.10:3334/i).respond(function (){
return [/*mockResponse*/];
});
}));
这将解决此错误。