Question

我在互联网上的代码并不完美，但在我看来，没有内存泄漏。但是要确定我使用的valgrind有不同的意见。

这是代码：

class BaseClass {
public:
    virtual ~BaseClass() {}
};

class DerivedClass1 : public BaseClass {
};

class DerivedClass2 : public BaseClass {
};

class UserClass {
private:
    BaseClass* base_;
public:
    void setDerived(BaseClass* p_base) {
        delete base_;
        base_ = p_base;
    }

    UserClass (BaseClass *p_base){
        base_ = p_base;
    }

    ~UserClass() {
       delete base_;
    }
};

int main() {
    UserClass * my_class = new UserClass(new DerivedClass1);
    my_class->setDerived(new DerivedClass2);
    return 0;
}

这是valgrind所说的：

==10125== HEAP SUMMARY:
==10125==     in use at exit: 16 bytes in 2 blocks
==10125==   total heap usage: 3 allocs, 1 frees, 24 bytes allocated
==10125== 
==10125== Searching for pointers to 2 not-freed blocks
==10125== Checked 179,544 bytes
==10125== 
==10125== 8 bytes in 1 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record 1 of 2
==10125==    at 0x4C28C90: operator new(unsigned long) (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==10125==    by 0x40074E: main (AbstractFactory.cpp:32)
==10125== 
==10125== 16 (8 direct, 8 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 2 of 2
==10125==    at 0x4C28C90: operator new(unsigned long) (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==10125==    by 0x400732: main (AbstractFactory.cpp:31)
==10125== 
==10125== LEAK SUMMARY:
==10125==    definitely lost: 8 bytes in 1 blocks
==10125==    indirectly lost: 8 bytes in 1 blocks
==10125==      possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==10125==    still reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==10125==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==10125== 
==10125== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 3 from 3)
--10125-- 
--10125-- used_suppression:      3 dl-hack3-cond-1 /usr/lib/valgrind/default.supp:1196
==10125== 
==10125== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 3 from 3)

对我来说，一切似乎都是正确的。在第31行中分配了内存，在setDerived方法中，它被释放。

感谢您的帮助。

Answer 1

你的代码漏了，是的。它也不是一个谜。

非常简单，你永远不会为my_class调用析构函数。

在delete my_class; return 0;之前的行上添加main。

神秘的内存泄漏

1 个答案: