我已经测试了串行和并发发送的JMS消息(5个线程同时从生产者发送jms消息)。
当我同时发送100条消息时,接收端的有效负载很少为NULL。串行发送时没有问题。
我是否需要设置会话池或在消费者端使用MDB来同时处理消息? JMS的设置很好,因为我们正在接收消息。我在这里错过了什么吗?
pproject设置的简短描述:
EDITED
JmsConsumer
package net;
import java.io.BufferedWriter;
import java.io.FileWriter;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.PrintWriter;
import java.util.Date;
import java.util.Hashtable;
import javax.jms.ExceptionListener;
import javax.jms.JMSException;
import javax.jms.Message;
import javax.jms.MessageListener;
import javax.jms.Queue;
import javax.jms.QueueConnection;
import javax.jms.QueueConnectionFactory;
import javax.jms.QueueReceiver;
import javax.jms.QueueSession;
import javax.jms.Session;
import javax.jms.TextMessage;
import javax.naming.Context;
import javax.naming.InitialContext;
public class ReadJMS implements MessageListener, ExceptionListener {
public final static String JNDI_FACTORY = "weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactory";
public final static String PROVIDER_URL = "t3://address:7003";
public final static String JMS_FACTORY = "MSS.QueueConnectionFactory";
public final static String QUEUE = "jms.queue";
@SuppressWarnings("null")
public void receiveMessage() throws Exception {
// System.out.println("receiveMessage()..");
Hashtable env = new Hashtable();
env.put(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY, JNDI_FACTORY);
env.put(Context.PROVIDER_URL, PROVIDER_URL);
// Define queue
QueueReceiver qreceiver = null;
QueueSession qsession = null;
QueueConnection qcon = null;
ReadJMS async = new ReadJMS();
try {
InitialContext ctx = new InitialContext(env);
QueueConnectionFactory qconFactory = (QueueConnectionFactory) ctx
.lookup(JMS_FACTORY);
qcon = qconFactory.createQueueConnection();
qcon.setExceptionListener(async);
qsession = qcon.createQueueSession(false, Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
Queue queue = (Queue) ctx.lookup(QUEUE);
qreceiver = qsession.createReceiver(queue);
qreceiver.setMessageListener(async);
qcon.start();
System.out.println("readingMessage()..");
// TextMessage msg = (TextMessage) qreceiver.receive();
// System.out.println("Message read from " + QUEUE + " : "
// + msg.getText());
// msg.acknowledge();
} catch (Exception ex) {
ex.printStackTrace();
}
// } finally {
// if (qreceiver != null)
// qreceiver.close();
// if (qsession != null)
// qsession.close();
// if (qcon != null)
// qcon.close();
// }
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
ReadJMS test = new ReadJMS();
System.out.println("init");
test.receiveMessage();
while (true) {
Thread.sleep(10000);
}
}
public void onException(JMSException arg0) {
System.err.println("Exception: " + arg0.getLocalizedMessage());
}
public synchronized void onMessage(Message arg0) {
try {
if(((TextMessage)arg0).getText() == null || ((TextMessage)arg0).getText().trim().length()==0){
System.out.println(" " + QUEUE + " : "
+ ((TextMessage) arg0).getText());
}
System.out.print(".");
PrintWriter out = new PrintWriter(new BufferedWriter(
new FileWriter("Output.txt", true)));
Date now = new Date();
out.println("message: "+now.toString()+ " - "+((TextMessage)arg0).getText()+"");
out.close();
} catch (JMSException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
WriteJms
package net;
import java.io.BufferedReader;
import java.io.InputStreamReader;
import java.util.Hashtable;
import javax.jms.Queue;
import javax.jms.QueueConnection;
import javax.jms.QueueConnectionFactory;
import javax.jms.QueueSender;
import javax.jms.QueueSession;
import javax.jms.Session;
import javax.jms.TextMessage;
import javax.naming.Context;
import javax.naming.InitialContext;
public class WriteJMS {
public final static String JNDI_FACTORY = "weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactory";
public final static String PROVIDER_URL = "t3://url:7003";
public final static String JMS_FACTORY = "MSS.QueueConnectionFactory";
public final static String QUEUE = "jms.queue";
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public void sendMessage() throws Exception {
@SuppressWarnings("rawtypes")
Hashtable env = new Hashtable();
env.put(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY, JNDI_FACTORY);
env.put(Context.PROVIDER_URL, PROVIDER_URL);
// Define queue
QueueSender qsender = null;
QueueSession qsession = null;
QueueConnection qcon = null;
try {
InitialContext ctx = new InitialContext(env);
QueueConnectionFactory qconFactory = (QueueConnectionFactory) ctx
.lookup(JMS_FACTORY);
qcon = qconFactory.createQueueConnection();
qsession = qcon.createQueueSession(false, Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
Queue queue = (Queue) ctx.lookup(QUEUE);
TextMessage msg = qsession.createTextMessage();
msg.setText("<eventMessage><eventId>123</eventId><eventName>123</eventName><documentNumber>123</documentNumber><customerId>123</customerId><actDDTaskDate>123</actDDTaskDate><taskStatusErrorMessage>123</taskStatusErrorMessage></eventMessage>");
qsender = qsession.createSender(queue);
qsender.send(msg);
System.out.println("Message [" + msg.getText()
+ "] sent to Queue: " + QUEUE);
} catch (Exception ex) {
ex.printStackTrace();
} finally {
if (qsender != null)
qsender.close();
if (qsession != null)
qsession.close();
if (qcon != null)
qcon.close();
}
}
}
答案 0 :(得分:0)
众所周知,禁止在多个线程中重用会话。但你不这样做。您可以为每条消息重新创建所有内容(连接会话和生产者)。这是低效的,但不是不正确的,不应该导致这些错误。你给我们的代码对我来说很好。
我有点惊讶的是发送方没有例外。您能否提供有关JMS实施的更多详细信息?也许消息代理的日志中有更多信息?
您是否计算过邮件并且收到的号码是否与发送的金额相等?其他人可以将消息发送到同一个队列吗?