我试图描述一个计划的弹簧作业,它在ScrollableResults
迭代器上进行计算。
为了描述我的代码,我在所有代码上放置了几个System.nanoTime()
,计算每个重要块代码所需的时间。该时间计算涵盖了所有代码,我非常确定。
批次的简化结构如下:
@Scheduled(cron=CRON_EXPRESSION)
@Transactional(readOnly=true)
public void calc() {
Session session = (Session) entityManager.unwrap(Session.class);
ScrollableResults entities = session.createQuery("select i.id from Entity i")
.setCacheMode(CacheMode.IGNORE)
.scroll(ScrollMode.FORWARD_ONLY);
while (entities.next()){
if ( ++count % 40 == 0 ) {
entityManager.flush();
entityManager.clear();
}
long idEntity = (long)entities.get(0);
calcService.calc(idEntity);
}
}
这是我的计算服务
@Transactional(readOnly=false, propagation=Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW, rollbackFor=Exception.class)
public void calc(Long id) {
// calculation jobs, load / saving entities from repositories
}
现在这里是我在所有数据集的子集上打印输出的结果日志。
Loaded dataset
Tot Eval ds elem: 1000 Tot Eval Subentity: 2000 Req Time: 89.16532s
Tot Eval ds elem: 2000 Tot Eval Subentity: 4000 Req Time: 69.86559s
Tot Eval ds elem: 3000 Tot Eval Subentity: 6000 Req Time: 66.897255s
Tot Eval ds elem: 4000 Tot Eval Subentity: 8000 Req Time: 66.97226s
Tot Eval ds elem: 5000 Tot Eval Subentity: 10000 Req Time: 65.657s
Tot Eval ds elem: 6000 Tot Eval Subentity: 12000 Req Time: 69.23902s
Tot Eval ds elem: 7000 Tot Eval Subentity: 14000 Req Time: 75.46887s
Tot Eval ds elem: 8000 Tot Eval Subentity: 16000 Req Time: 68.46504s
Tot Eval ds elem: 9000 Tot Eval Subentity: 18000 Req Time: 65.976746s
Tot Eval ds elem: 10000 Tot Eval Subentity: 20000 Req Time: 67.081604s
LOAD DATASET SCROLLABLE RESULT: 0.02076124s
LOAD EACH ENTITY OF DATASET: 0.02628186s
MARK ALL SUBENTITYes DELETABLE: 16.105577s
FIND SUBENTITY REPORT: 17.970514s
FIND SUBENTITY REPORT2: 34.058716s
MATCH RULE FOR SUBENTITY: 0.15097496s
CALCULATE MASTER REPORT: 10.864335s
FIND SUBENTITY DEADLINE: 15.759168s
FIND SUBENTITY REPORT: 20.173891s
CALCULATE DEDALINE: 0.003906471s
SAVE DEADLINE: 22.892395s
FINISH: CLEAN UNUSED: 0.001640737s
FLUSHes / CLEANs ENTITY MANAGER: 0.009685958s
------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL TIME FROM START: 704.79083s
TOTAL TIME CALCULATED: 138.03619384765625s
UNKNOWN TIME: 566.7546997070312s
我还在junit测试期间发布了两个VM分析的截图,如果它可能有用..
这里有一些来自iotop
的与mysql守护进程相关的快照:
Total DISK READ : 0.00 B/s | Total DISK WRITE : 824.04 K/s
Actual DISK READ: 0.00 B/s | Actual DISK WRITE: 1069.55 K/s
TID PRIO USER DISK READ DISK WRITE SWAPIN IO> COMMAND
168 be/3 root 0.00 B/s 0.00 B/s 0.00 % 79.97 % [jbd2/sda3-8]
9043 be/4 mysql 0.00 B/s 82.76 K/s 0.00 % 1.78 % mysqld
2232 be/4 mysql 0.00 B/s 740.09 K/s 0.00 % 1.05 % mysqld
4302 be/4 marco 0.00 B/s 1222.34 B/s 0.00 % 0.34 % chromium-browser --ppapi-flash-path=/usr/lib/pepperflashplugin~ppapi-flash-version=13.0.0.206 --enable-pinch [BrowserBlocking]
2364 be/4 root 0.00 B/s 0.00 B/s 0.00 % 0.04 % [kworker/u8:0]
1294 be/4 mysql 0.00 B/s 0.00 B/s 0.00 % 0.00 % mysqld
Total DISK READ : 0.00 B/s | Total DISK WRITE : 810.60 K/s
Actual DISK READ: 0.00 B/s | Actual DISK WRITE: 1234.21 K/s
TID PRIO USER DISK READ DISK WRITE SWAPIN IO> COMMAND
168 be/3 root 0.00 B/s 5.18 K/s 0.00 % 79.21 % [jbd2/sda3-8]
9043 be/4 mysql 0.00 B/s 80.02 K/s 0.00 % 2.52 % mysqld
4863 be/4 marco 0.00 B/s 815.38 B/s 0.00 % 1.89 % java -Dorg.eclipse.swt.browser.IEVersion=10001 -Djava.library.~//plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.3.0.v20130327-1440.jar
21320 be/4 marco 0.00 B/s 815.38 B/s 0.00 % 1.56 % java -Djdk.home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64 -classpath /~-cachedir /home/marco/.cache/visualvm/1.3.5 --branding visualvm
29194 be/4 marco 0.00 B/s 407.69 B/s 0.00 % 1.53 % java -Dorg.eclipse.swt.browser.IEVersion=10001 -Djava.library.~//plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.3.0.v20130327-1440.jar
2232 be/4 mysql 0.00 B/s 721.82 K/s 0.00 % 1.29 % mysqld
18165 be/4 root 0.00 B/s 0.00 B/s 0.00 % 0.03 % [kworker/u8:1]
Total DISK READ : 407.55 B/s | Total DISK WRITE : 1735.66 K/s
Actual DISK READ: 407.55 B/s | Actual DISK WRITE: 1266.82 K/s
TID PRIO USER DISK READ DISK WRITE SWAPIN IO> COMMAND
168 be/3 root 0.00 B/s 10.75 K/s 0.00 % 82.54 % [jbd2/sda3-8]
9043 be/4 mysql 0.00 B/s 82.39 K/s 0.00 % 4.85 % mysqld
2232 be/4 mysql 0.00 B/s 733.11 K/s 0.00 % 2.84 % mysqld
5255 be/4 marco 407.55 B/s 0.00 B/s 0.00 % 0.24 % gedit
Total DISK READ : 26.26 K/s | Total DISK WRITE : 831.29 K/s
Actual DISK READ: 26.26 K/s | Actual DISK WRITE: 1807.43 K/s
TID PRIO USER DISK READ DISK WRITE SWAPIN IO> COMMAND
168 be/3 root 0.00 B/s 6.37 K/s 0.00 % 79.81 % [jbd2/sda3-8]
2232 be/4 mysql 0.00 B/s 740.56 K/s 0.00 % 2.40 % mysqld
9043 be/4 mysql 0.00 B/s 81.18 K/s 0.00 % 2.09 % mysqld
18165 be/4 root 26.26 K/s 0.00 B/s 0.00 % 1.68 % [kworker/u8:1]
4391 be/4 marco 0.00 B/s 1629.95 B/s 0.00 % 1.29 % chromium-browser --ppapi-flash-path=/usr/lib/pepperflashplugin~ppapi-flash-version=13.0.0.206 --enable-pinch [BrowserBlocking]
1294 be/4 mysql 0.00 B/s 0.00 B/s 0.00 % 0.00 % mysqld
Total DISK READ : 0.00 B/s | Total DISK WRITE : 828.89 K/s
Actual DISK READ: 0.00 B/s | Actual DISK WRITE: 1071.51 K/s
TID PRIO USER DISK READ DISK WRITE SWAPIN IO> COMMAND
168 be/3 root 0.00 B/s 1221.86 B/s 0.00 % 81.63 % [jbd2/sda3-8]
9043 be/4 mysql 0.00 B/s 83.53 K/s 0.00 % 2.00 % mysqld
2232 be/4 mysql 0.00 B/s 742.18 K/s 0.00 % 1.98 % mysqld
以及CPU分析器的屏幕截图:
问题在于TOTAL TIME CALCULATED
,即我使用System.nanoTime()
收集的所有值的SUM与大约566秒的TOTAL TIME FROM START
之间的差异(总共704:| )。这是一个变化很大的时间。而且我无法知道这个时间浪费在哪里!
也许spring框架需要那些秒来处理事务/其他事情?事实上,我为每个数据集元素都有一个新事务。如果是,我该如何描述它?
任何帮助都将不胜感激。
在想到这一点之后,我想起了一些我无法理解的时间被用于代理calcService.calc()
?可以吗?
答案 0 :(得分:2)
有一个带有visualvm的CPU分析器,我会给它一个去(你可能必须将它作为插件安装) - 或者如果你需要更深入的CPU分析,请尝试JProfiler