TLDR:将Web配置文件示例迁移到完整的EE应用程序后,CDI的行为与我的预期不同
首先我要说的是我对CDI比较陌生。我喜欢认为我理解这个概念,但实施的细微差别尚未被征服。
我正在尝试EJB-ify并随后使用RESTful API Java Batch(JSR-352)进行包装。
首先,我已将javaee7样本用于Payroll并将逻辑和作业规范拉入一个完整的EE7项目(ejb,web,ear模块)。
当我调用RESTful服务时,我最初遇到这个问题(缩短以保存理智):
WARNING: Caught exception executing step: java.lang.RuntimeException: com.ibm.jbatch.container.exception.BatchContainerRuntimeException: Tried but failed to load artifact with id: SimpleItemProcessor
Caused by: com.ibm.jbatch.container.exception.BatchContainerRuntimeException: Tried but failed to load artifact with id: SimpleItemProcessor
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: SimpleItemProcessor
请记住,应用程序的这一部分应该看到大致没有变化。 SimpleItemProcessor定义相同,如下所示。
@Named("SimpleItemProcessor")
public class SimpleItemProcessor
implements ItemProcessor {
@Inject
private JobContext jobContext;
public Object processItem(Object obj) throws Exception {
Properties jobParameters = BatchRuntime.getJobOperator().getParameters(jobContext.getExecutionId());
PayrollInputRecord inputRecord = (PayrollInputRecord) obj;
PayrollRecord payrollRecord = new PayrollRecord();
payrollRecord.setMonthYear((String) jobParameters.get("monthYear"));
int base = inputRecord.getBaseSalary();
float tax = base * 27 / 100.0f;
float bonus = base * 15 / 100.0f;
payrollRecord.setEmpID(inputRecord.getId());
payrollRecord.setBase(base);
payrollRecord.setTax(tax);
payrollRecord.setBonus(bonus);
payrollRecord.setNet(base + bonus - tax);
return payrollRecord;
}
}
这个SimpleItemProcessor由PayrollJob.xml定义中的CDI Name引用(Batch环境正在清楚地找到它)。该规范也是工作JavaEE7示例的副本。
<job id="payroll" xmlns="http://xmlns.jcp.org/xml/ns/javaee" version="1.0">
<step id="process">
<chunk item-count="3">
<reader ref="SimpleItemReader"></reader>
<processor ref="SimpleItemProcessor"></processor>
<writer ref="SimpleItemWriter"></writer>
</chunk>
</step>
如果我使用SimpleItemProcessor(com.mycompany.SimpleItemProcessor)的完全限定名称,它似乎工作。其他两个批处理组件(Reader和Writer)似乎不需要这个。
我的猜测是我在CDI土地上遗漏了一些东西。
这一切都在Glassfish 4上运行。
我的web模块的WEB-INF和EJB模块的META-INF都有空的beans.xml。
请告诉我您可能对此有任何见解。我已经搅拌了很长时间。
编辑: 增加了批处理组件的日志记录,抛出了异常并得到了一些指向某些东西的有趣内容,可能与CDI相关。
FINER: ENTRY Loading batch artifact id = SimpleItemReader
FINER: Delegating to preferred artifact factorycom.ibm.jbatch.container.services.impl.CDIBatchArtifactFactoryImpl@4ac13bc2
FINER: ENTRY Loading batch artifact id = SimpleItemReader
FINER: RETURN For batch artifact id = SimpleItemReader, loaded artifact instance: com.mycompany.SimpleItemReader@4862cec7 of type: com.mycompany.SimpleItemReader
FINER: ENTRY Loading batch artifact id = SimpleItemProcessor
FINER: Delegating to preferred artifact factorycom.ibm.jbatch.container.services.impl.CDIBatchArtifactFactoryImpl@4ac13bc2
FINER: ENTRY Loading batch artifact id = SimpleItemProcessor
FINE: Tried but failed to load artifact with id: SimpleItemProcessor, Exception = java.util.NoSuchElementException
FINER: RETURN For batch artifact id = SimpleItemProcessor, FAILED to load artifact instance
FINER: Preferred artifact factory failed to load artifact SimpleItemProcessor. Defaulting to batch.xml.
FINE: TCCL = EarClassLoader :
失败的实现的CDI部分(bm.getBeans(id)将返回为空):
51 private Object More ...getArtifactById(String id) {
52
53 Object artifactInstance = null;
54
55 try {
56 InitialContext initialContext = new InitialContext();
57 BeanManager bm = (BeanManager) initialContext.lookup("java:comp/BeanManager");
58 Bean bean = bm.getBeans(id).iterator().next();
59 Class clazz = bean.getBeanClass();
60 artifactInstance = bm.getReference(bean, clazz, bm.createCreationalContext(bean));
61 } catch (Exception e) {
62 // Don't throw an exception but simply return null;
63 logger.fine("Tried but failed to load artifact with id: " + id + ", Exception = " + e);
64 }
65
66 return artifactInstance;
67 }
以下是工作网络配置文件示例的相同日志记录:
FINER: ENTRY
FINER: No preferred job xml loader is detected in configuration
FINER: Preferred job xml loader failed to load PayrollJob. Defaulting to META-INF/batch-jobs/
FINER: Loaded job xml with PayrollJob from META-INF/batch-jobs/
FINER: ENTRY Loading batch artifact id = SimpleItemReader
FINER: Delegating to preferred artifact factorycom.ibm.jbatch.container.services.impl.CDIBatchArtifactFactoryImpl@4ac13bc2
FINER: ENTRY Loading batch artifact id = SimpleItemReader
FINER: RETURN For batch artifact id = SimpleItemReader, loaded artifact instance: com.oracle.javaee7.samples.batch.api.SimpleItemReader@753908c of type: com.oracle.javaee7.samples.batch.api.SimpleItemReader
FINER: ENTRY Loading batch artifact id = SimpleItemProcessor
FINER: Delegating to preferred artifact factorycom.ibm.jbatch.container.services.impl.CDIBatchArtifactFactoryImpl@4ac13bc2
FINER: ENTRY Loading batch artifact id = SimpleItemProcessor
FINER: RETURN For batch artifact id = SimpleItemProcessor, loaded artifact instance: com.oracle.javaee7.samples.batch.api.SimpleItemProcessor@5376b860 of type: com.oracle.javaee7.samples.batch.api.SimpleItemProcessor
FINER: ENTRY Loading batch artifact id = SimpleItemWriter
FINER: Delegating to preferred artifact factorycom.ibm.jbatch.container.services.impl.CDIBatchArtifactFactoryImpl@4ac13bc2
FINER: ENTRY Loading batch artifact id = SimpleItemWriter
FINER: RETURN For batch artifact id = SimpleItemWriter, loaded artifact instance: com.oracle.javaee7.samples.batch.api.SimpleItemWriter@243e016c of type: com.oracle.javaee7.samples.batch.api.SimpleItemWriter
答案 0 :(得分:4)
最近的搜索引导我到这里,所以让我尽管问题的年龄给出了部分答案。
首先,对于背景,请快速阅读CDI的“bean发现模式”,例如:见here。
现在,1.0XSD级别的空beans.xml的存在将被CDI视为 ALL 模式,而缺少beans.xml将被视为默认注释模式。
批量工件对CDI并不特别特殊。因此,与任何类一样,它们只会被视为CDI托管bean,并且只有在以下任何一个时才能通过bean名称(@Named
值)访问:
@Dependent
确实是一个bean定义注释)。我的猜测是,在您的重新打包中,CDI不再检测到beans.xml,因此您有效地从 ALL 转移到 ANNOTATED 模式,需要{ {1}} bean定义注释,用于按bean名称加载批处理工件。
(为什么会这样?OP没有进入那么多细节并且已经很好地转移到现在我确定......所以无所谓,其余的答案我认为仍然很有价值)
希望这对某人有帮助!
答案 1 :(得分:3)
我和你的情况非常相似,直到我发现了一些对我有用的东西,我希望它对你也有用。
注意:我也不是CDI的专家。
1)您可以使用@Named添加@Dependent(javax.enterprise.context.Dependent)。 E.g:
@Dependent
@Named("SimpleItemProcessor")
public class SimpleItemProcessor implements ItemProcessor {
// ...
}
对所有SimpleItemReader,SimpleItemProcessor和SimpleItemWriter执行此操作。这包括您应用中的所有Batchlet。
2)尽量不要将JobContext设为私有,而是将其设为:
@Inject
protected JobContext jobContext;
或
@Inject
JobContext jobContext;
到目前为止,这些对我有用......