我有以下代码:
nth <- expression(((1/p)*a0/2)+sum(((1/p)*a*cos(i*pi*x/p)))+sum((1/p)*b*sin(i*pi*x/p)))
nth <- as.expression(gsub('pi',pi,nth))
nth <- as.expression(gsub('p',p,nth))
nth <- as.expression(gsub('a0',a0,nth))
nth <- as.expression(gsub('a',a,nth))
nth <- as.expression(gsub('b',b,nth))
这导致表达式:
"((1/1) * 1.26424111790395/2) + sum(((1/1) * 0.251688909862584 * cos(i * 3.14159265358979 * x/1))) + sum((1/1) * -1.03501509824516e-16 * sin(i * 3.14159265358979 * x/1))"
接下来我要做的是用一个列表(例如i = 1:3)来评估i而不评估x。所以我想要得到的是:
"((1/1) * 1.26424111790395/2) + sum(((1/1) * 0.251688909862584 * cos(1 * 3.14159265358979 * x/1)), ((1/1) * 0.251688909862584 * cos(2 * 3.14159265358979 * x/1)), ((1/1) * 0.251688909862584 * cos(3 * 3.14159265358979 * x/1))) + sum(((1/1) * 0.251688909862584 * sin(1 * 3.14159265358979 * x/1)), ((1/1) * 0.251688909862584 * sin(2 * 3.14159265358979 * x/1)), ((1/1) * 0.251688909862584 * sin(3 * 3.14159265358979 * x/1)))"
我该怎么做?感谢。
答案 0 :(得分:1)
为什么不尝试这个。您将看到我在循环中包装了您需要的值,并将所有输出放在一个新的“已完成”数据框中,该数据框将在您循环循环时更新。您可以指定我有多少,并根据需要更改表达式:
# Define the initial variables that might be changed here
var_1 <- 3.14159265358979 # This referred to pi in your initial expression
var_2 <- 1 # This referred to p in your initial expression
var_3 <- 1.26424111790395 # This refers to a0 in your initial expression
var_4 <- 0.251688909862584 # This refers to a in your initial expression
var_5 <- -1.03501509824516e-16 # This refers to b in your initial expression
n <- 3 # This is the number of equations that will be run through
# Create an empty dataframe to hold the outputted expressions
finished = c() # Empty data frame
# Create an array holding values from 1 to the number of n's that will be run through
cycle <- c(1:n)
# Convert cycle to a matrix
cycle <- as.matrix(cycle)
# The variable we will be changing is i ... Create the initial loop
for (i in 1:3 ) {
nth <- expression(((1/p)*a0/2)+sum(((1/p)*a*cos(i*pi*x/p)))+sum((1/p)*b*sin(i*pi*x/p))) # Write the expression to be changed
# Substitute in all the relevant values. Note that this is made to be more explicity
nth <- as.expression(gsub('pi',var_1,nth))
nth <- as.expression(gsub('p',var_2,nth))
nth <- as.expression(gsub('a0',var_3,nth))
nth <- as.expression(gsub('a',var_4,nth))
nth <- as.expression(gsub('b',var_5,nth))
# I will also, for each value, substitue in relevant value from the cycle array
# This will change the i values for you
i_index <- cycle[i,1]
i_index <- as.character(i_index)
nth <- as.expression(gsub('i',i_index,nth)) # Append the nth equation
# I will then bind this solution into the finished data frame to hold all solutions
finished[i] = nth
}
这是运行代码后生成的输出:
expression("((1/1) * 1.26424111790395/2) + sum(((1/1) * 0.251688909862584 * cos(1 * 3.14159265358979 * x/1))) + sum((1/1) * -1.03501509824516e-16 * s1n(1 * 3.14159265358979 * x/1))",
"((1/1) * 1.26424111790395/2) + sum(((1/1) * 0.251688909862584 * cos(2 * 3.14159265358979 * x/1))) + sum((1/1) * -1.03501509824516e-16 * s2n(2 * 3.14159265358979 * x/1))",
"((1/1) * 1.26424111790395/2) + sum(((1/1) * 0.251688909862584 * cos(3 * 3.14159265358979 * x/1))) + sum((1/1) * -1.03501509824516e-16 * s3n(3 * 3.14159265358979 * x/1))")
答案 1 :(得分:0)
这应该让你去。你肯定在gsub
的正确轨道上
请注意,原始表达式中的j
分别被替换为1,2和3。我选择了j
,因为gsub
i
会干扰sin
和pi
。希望它有所帮助...
> expres <- "(((1/p)*a0/2)+sum(((1/p)*a*cos(j*pi*x/p)))+sum((1/p)*b*sin(j*pi*x/p)))"
> noquote(sapply(1:3, function(j){
GS <- gsub("j", as.numeric(j), expres)
paste0("expression(", GS, ")")
}))
[1] expression((((1/p)*a0/2)+sum(((1/p)*a*cos(1*pi*x/p)))+sum((1/p)*b*sin(1*pi*x/p))))
[2] expression((((1/p)*a0/2)+sum(((1/p)*a*cos(2*pi*x/p)))+sum((1/p)*b*sin(2*pi*x/p))))
[3] expression((((1/p)*a0/2)+sum(((1/p)*a*cos(3*pi*x/p)))+sum((1/p)*b*sin(3*pi*x/p))))
答案 2 :(得分:0)
另一种可能的解决方案是使用substitute
g = function(i){
env = list(pi=pi, p=1, a0=1.26424111790395, a=0.251688909862584, b=-1.03501509824516e-16, i=i)
as.character(as.expression(substitute(((1/p)*a0/2)+sum(((1/p)*a*cos(i*pi*x/p)))+sum((1/p)*b*sin(i*pi*x/p)), env)))
}
paste(lapply(1:3, g), collapse=", ")