我在WPF中有一个CustomControl。
[TemplatePart(Name = ControlSaveButtonName, Type = typeof(Button))]
[TemplatePart(Name = ControlCancelButtonName, Type = typeof(Button))]
[TemplatePart(Name = ControlPanelName, Type = typeof(Panel))]
public class BaseEditEntityControl : Control
{
public const string ControlSaveButtonName = "PART_SaveButton";
public const string ControlCancelButtonName = "PART_CancelButton";
public const string ControlPanelName = "PART_Panel";
static BaseEditEntityControl()
{
DefaultStyleKeyProperty.OverrideMetadata(typeof(BaseEditEntityControl), new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(typeof(BaseEditEntityControl)));
}
private Button _saveButtonControl;
public Button SaveButtonControl
{
get { return _saveButtonControl; }
}
private Button _cancelButtonControl;
public Button CancelButtonControl
{
get { return _cancelButtonControl; }
}
private Panel _panelControl;
public Panel PanelControl
{
get { return _panelControl; }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty EntityProperty = DependencyProperty.Register(
"Entity", typeof(object), typeof(BaseEditEntityControl));
//, new FrameworkPropertyMetadata
//{
// BindsTwoWayByDefault = true,
// PropertyChangedCallback = BaseEntityPropertyChanged
//});
public object Entity
{
get { return GetValue(EntityProperty); }
set { SetValue(EntityProperty, value); FillPropertyControls(); }
}
public BaseEditEntityControl()
{
}
public override void OnApplyTemplate()
{
base.OnApplyTemplate();
_saveButtonControl = GetTemplateChild(ControlSaveButtonName) as Button;
_cancelButtonControl = GetTemplateChild(ControlCancelButtonName) as Button;
_panelControl = GetTemplateChild(ControlPanelName) as Panel;
if (_saveButtonControl != null) _saveButtonControl.Click += SaveButton_Click;
if (_cancelButtonControl != null) _cancelButtonControl.Click += CancelButton_Click;
}
public void FillPropertyControls()
{
//Some Code
}
//private static void BaseEntityPropertyChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
//{
// var baseEntityControl = d as BaseEditEntityControl;
// if (baseEntityControl == null) return;
//
// baseEntityControl.Entity = e.NewValue as BaseEntity;
//}
}
控制模板:
<Style x:Key="PassportEntityEditControlStyle" TargetType="{x:Type base:BaseEditEntityControl}">
<Setter Property="IsTabStop" Value="False"/>
<Setter Property="Template">
<Setter.Value>
<ControlTemplate TargetType="{x:Type base:BaseEditEntityControl}">
<StackPanel x:Name="PART_Panel" Orientation="Vertical">
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Entity, RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorType=base:BaseEditEntityControl}}"></TextBlock>
</StackPanel>
</ControlTemplate>
</Setter.Value>
</Setter>
</Style>
使用控制:
<Style TargetType="propertyControls1:PersonPassportPropertyControl">
<Setter Property="IsTabStop" Value="False"/>
<Setter Property="Template">
<Setter.Value>
<ControlTemplate TargetType="propertyControls1:PersonPassportPropertyControl">
<Grid ScrollViewer.CanContentScroll="True">
<Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ColumnDefinition Width="*"></ColumnDefinition>
</Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<base:BaseEditEntityControl x:Name="PART_Value" ScrollViewer.CanContentScroll="True"
Entity="{Binding PropertyBinding, RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorType=propertyControls1:PersonPassportPropertyControl}}"
Style="{StaticResource PassportEntityEditControlStyle}"/>
</Grid>
</ControlTemplate>
</Setter.Value>
</Setter>
</Style>
PersonPassportPropertyControl也是一个自定义控件。
问题:填充了TextBox,但未调用“实体集”和FillPropertyControls。如果取消注释PropertyChangedCallback,则调用BaseEntityPropertyChanged。
答案 0 :(得分:1)
绑定不使用get和set访问器。
按以下方式更改Entity属性:
//Entity Dependency Property
public object Entity
{
get { return (object)GetValue(EntityProperty); }
set { SetValue(EntityProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty EntityProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("Entity", typeof(object),
typeof(BaseEditEntityControl),
new UIPropertyMetadata(null),
(d, e) => { FillPropertyControls(); });
答案 1 :(得分:1)
这就是它的设计工作方式。文档中也清楚地提到XAML绕过属性包装器并直接调用GetValue
和SetValue
。
来自MSDN:
其XAML处理器的当前WPF实现本质上是 依赖属性意识到。 WPF XAML处理器使用属性系统 加载二进制XAML和时的依赖属性的方法 处理属性是依赖属性。 这有效 绕过属性包装器。实现自定义依赖项时 属性,你必须考虑到这种行为,应该避免 将任何其他代码放在属性包装器中除了 属性系统方法GetValue和SetValue。
使用 PropertyChangeCallback
代替您在依赖项属性更改时执行要执行的代码。