假设一个类定义了一个常量字段:
public class Foo {
public static final int CONSTANT_FIELD = 3;
}
假设注释接口声明如下:
public @interface Something {
int value();
}
最后,假设注释使用如下:
@Something(Foo.CONSTANT_FIELD)
问题:在注释处理器中,如何在设置CONSTANT_FIELD
的值时使用@Something
的元素?
编辑:在问题中包含一个具体的例子。
我有一个像这样使用的注释:
@RuleDependency(recognizer = BQLParser.class,
rule = BQLParser.RULE_statement,
version = 0)
注释处理器需要知道RULE_statement
是BQLParser
类中定义的常量。如果我可以通过设置注释的Element
属性直接访问BQLParser.RULE_statement
rule
,则无需recognizer
属性。此注释在实际应用程序中使用了数千次,而recognizer
总是只是rule
常量的声明类型。解决这个问题会简化注释用法:
@RuleDependency(rule = BQLParser.RULE_statement, version = 0)
答案 0 :(得分:3)
我能够使用Compiler Trees API实现此功能。
更新 pom.xml 以包含以下配置文件,以确保在默认情况下未引用 tools.jar 的系统上引用 tools.jar 。 p>
<profiles>
<profile>
<!-- Java 6 and earlier have java.vendor set to "Sun Microsystems Inc." -->
<id>default-tools-6.jar</id>
<activation>
<property>
<name>java.vendor</name>
<value>Sun Microsystems Inc.</value>
</property>
</activation>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.sun</groupId>
<artifactId>tools</artifactId>
<version>1.6</version>
<scope>system</scope>
<systemPath>${java.home}/../lib/tools.jar</systemPath>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</profile>
<profile>
<!-- Java 7 and later have java.vendor set to "Oracle Corporation" -->
<id>default-tools.jar</id>
<activation>
<property>
<name>java.vendor</name>
<value>Oracle Corporation</value>
</property>
</activation>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.sun</groupId>
<artifactId>tools</artifactId>
<version>1.6</version>
<scope>system</scope>
<systemPath>${java.home}/../lib/tools.jar</systemPath>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</profile>
</profiles>
覆盖Processor.init
以获取Trees
的实例。
@Override
public void init(ProcessingEnvironment processingEnv) {
super.init(processingEnv);
this.trees = Trees.instance(processingEnv);
}
实施TreePathScanner<TypeMirror, Void>
,用于获取分配给注释中TypeMirror
属性的声明类型的rule
。
private class AnnotationVisitor extends TreePathScanner<TypeMirror, Void> {
@Override
public TypeMirror visitAnnotation(AnnotationTree node, Void p) {
for (ExpressionTree expressionTree : node.getArguments()) {
if (!(expressionTree instanceof AssignmentTree)) {
continue;
}
AssignmentTree assignmentTree = (AssignmentTree)expressionTree;
ExpressionTree variable = assignmentTree.getVariable();
if (!(variable instanceof IdentifierTree) || !((IdentifierTree)variable).getName().contentEquals("rule")) {
continue;
}
return scan(expressionTree, p);
}
return null;
}
@Override
public TypeMirror visitAssignment(AssignmentTree at, Void p) {
return scan(at.getExpression(), p);
}
@Override
public TypeMirror visitMemberSelect(MemberSelectTree mst, Void p) {
return scan(mst.getExpression(), p);
}
@Override
public TypeMirror visitIdentifier(IdentifierTree it, Void p) {
return trees.getTypeMirror(this.getCurrentPath());
}
}
为recognizer
属性提供默认值。我希望这可能是null
,但Java明确禁止...... {/ p>
/**
* Gets the recognizer class where the dependent parser rules are defined.
* This may reference the generated parser class directly, or for simplicity
* in certain cases, any class derived from it.
* <p>
* If this value is not specified, the default value {@link Parser}
* indicates that the declaring type of the constant value specified for
* {@link #rule} should be used as the recognizer type.
* </p>
*/
Class<? extends Recognizer<?, ?>> recognizer() default Parser.class;
更新代码,该代码收集有关应用于代码中特定RuleDependency
实例的Element
注释的信息,以便首先尝试访问recognizer
属性,如果它&#39 ;未指定,请使用rule
属性中常量的声明类型。为简洁起见,此代码示例中省略了错误处理。
RuleDependency dependency = element.getAnnotation(RuleDependency.class);
// first try to get the parser type from the annotation
TypeMirror recognizerType = getRecognizerType(dependency);
if (recognizerType != null && !recognizerType.toString().equals(Parser.class.getName())) {
result.add(new Triple<RuleDependency, TypeMirror, Element>(dependency, recognizerType, element));
continue;
}
// fallback to compiler tree API
AnnotationMirror annotationMirror = null;
for (AnnotationMirror mirror : element.getAnnotationMirrors()) {
if (processingEnv.getTypeUtils().isSameType(ruleDependencyTypeElement.asType(), mirror.getAnnotationType())) {
annotationMirror = mirror;
break;
}
}
AnnotationValue annotationValue = null;
for (Map.Entry<? extends ExecutableElement, ? extends AnnotationValue> entry : annotationMirror.getElementValues().entrySet()) {
if (entry.getKey().getSimpleName().contentEquals("rule")) {
annotationValue = entry.getValue();
break;
}
}
TreePath treePath = trees.getPath(element, annotationMirror, annotationValue);
AnnotationVisitor visitor = new AnnotationVisitor();
recognizerType = visitor.scan(treePath, null);
result.add(new Triple<RuleDependency, TypeMirror, Element>(dependency, recognizerType, element));
答案 1 :(得分:1)
如果rule
是int
,则注释处理器无法找到int
的定义位置。但是,您可以对enum
字段使用int
而不是rule
,并在其中对您的规则进行分组,并引用其解析器。也许是这样的:
Parser界面:
public interface RuleParser {
}
示例实施:
public class RuleParserImpl implements RuleParser {
}
规则枚举:
public enum Rule {
RULE_STATEMENT(RuleParserImpl.class);
private final Class<? extends RuleParser> ruleParserClass;
private Rule(Class<? extends RuleParser> ruleParser) {
this.ruleParserClass = ruleParser;
}
public Class<? extends RuleParser> getRuleParserClass() {
return ruleParserClass;
}
}
使用枚举而不是int字段的注释:
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
public @interface RuleDependency {
Rule rule();
}
用法示例:
@RuleDependency(rule = Rule.RULE_STATEMENT)
public class RuleProcessor {
public static void main(String[] args) {
RuleDependency ruleDependency = RuleProcessor.class.getAnnotation(RuleDependency.class);
Rule rule = ruleDependency.rule();
Class<? extends RuleParser> ruleParserClass = rule.getRuleParserClass();
System.out.println(ruleParserClass); //Prints "class RuleParserImpl"
}
}
希望能给你一些想法。