我有函数at
,用于通过运行时指定的索引访问std :: tuple元素
template<std::size_t _Index = 0, typename _Tuple, typename _Function>
inline typename std::enable_if<_Index == std::tuple_size<_Tuple>::value, void>::type
for_each(_Tuple &, _Function)
{}
template<std::size_t _Index = 0, typename _Tuple, typename _Function>
inline typename std::enable_if < _Index < std::tuple_size<_Tuple>::value, void>::type
for_each(_Tuple &t, _Function f)
{
f(std::get<_Index>(t));
for_each<_Index + 1, _Tuple, _Function>(t, f);
}
namespace detail { namespace at {
template < typename _Function >
struct helper
{
inline helper(size_t index_, _Function f_) : index(index_), f(f_), count(0) {}
template < typename _Arg >
void operator()(_Arg &arg_) const
{
if(index == count++)
f(arg_);
}
const size_t index;
mutable size_t count;
_Function f;
};
}} // end of namespace detail
template < typename _Tuple, typename _Function >
void at(_Tuple &t, size_t index_, _Function f)
{
if(std::tuple_size<_Tuple> ::value <= index_)
throw std::out_of_range("");
for_each(t, detail::at::helper<_Function>(index_, f));
}
它具有线性复杂性。我怎样才能实现O(1)复杂性?
答案 0 :(得分:18)
假设你传递类似于泛型lambda的东西,即带有重载函数调用操作符的函数对象:
#include <iostream>
struct Func
{
template<class T>
void operator()(T p)
{
std::cout << __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ << " : " << p << "\n";
}
};
您可以构建一个函数指针数组:
#include <tuple>
template<int... Is> struct seq {};
template<int N, int... Is> struct gen_seq : gen_seq<N-1, N-1, Is...> {};
template<int... Is> struct gen_seq<0, Is...> : seq<Is...> {};
template<int N, class T, class F>
void apply_one(T& p, F func)
{
func( std::get<N>(p) );
}
template<class T, class F, int... Is>
void apply(T& p, int index, F func, seq<Is...>)
{
using FT = void(T&, F);
static constexpr FT* arr[] = { &apply_one<Is, T, F>... };
arr[index](p, func);
}
template<class T, class F>
void apply(T& p, int index, F func)
{
apply(p, index, func, gen_seq<std::tuple_size<T>::value>{});
}
用法示例:
int main()
{
std::tuple<int, double, char, double> t{1, 2.3, 4, 5.6};
for(int i = 0; i < 4; ++i) apply(t, i, Func{});
}
clang ++还接受应用于包含lambda表达式的模式的扩展:
static FT* arr[] = { [](T& p, F func){ func(std::get<Is>(p)); }... };
(虽然我承认看起来很奇怪)
g ++ 4.8.1拒绝这一点。