我有以下映射
public class FilmMap : ClassMap<Film>
{
public FilmMap()
{
Id(x => x.FilmId, "film_id");
Map(x => x.Description);
base.HasMany<FilmActor>(x => x.FilmActor).BatchSize(100);
}
}
public class FilmActorMap : ClassMap<FilmActor>
{
public FilmActorMap()
{
Table("film_actor");
CompositeId()
//.KeyReference(x => x.Actor, "actor_id")
.KeyProperty(x => x.ActorId, "actor_id")
.KeyProperty(x => x.FilmId, "film_id");
Map(x => x.LastUpdate, "last_update");
References<Actor>(x => x.Actor, "actor_id"); //.Fetch.Join();
}
}
public class ActorMap : ClassMap<Actor>
{
public ActorMap()
{
Id(x => x.ActorId, "actor_id");
Map(x => x.FirstName, "first_name");
}
}
运行它的代码
var films = session.QueryOver<Film>().Where(x => x.FilmId < 5).Future();
foreach (var film in films)
{
foreach (var actor in film.FilmActor) //Does a batch query
{
Console.Write(actor.Actor.FirstName + ", ");
//For each actor it fetches the record from db
}
}
当我从Actor中为每个actor获取数据时,会触发一个查询。 我希望nHibernate也能为Actor调用In-Query。这看起来像下面的
SELECT actor_id, first_name
FROM actor
WHERE actor_id in (actor_id batch collected from film.FilmActor )
我不想在批处理中使用filmActor和Actor之间的连接,因为这证明是昂贵的。
如何加载一对一地图/参考以进行批量提取
答案 0 :(得分:2)
你快到了。您完成的所有batch-size
映射都是正确的,但BatchSize不仅可以设置为集合,还可以设置为classes
。
public ActorMap()
{
Id(x => x.ActorId, "actor_id");
Map(x => x.FirstName, "first_name");
BatchSize(100);
}
注意:我的经验是几乎每个班级都使用它,完全出于你在这里提到的原因...我们将通过更有效的批处理获得延迟加载