我是C和CUDA的新手,我正在编写点积函数,但它没有给我正确的结果。某种善意的灵魂会帮助我看看吗?
我也有两个问题,
在第57行,为什么它是产品[threadIdx.x]而不是产品[index]?我不能写
product [index] = a [index] * b [index]; ... if(index == 0){...} 并以这种方式将每个元素与第零个线程相加?
非常感谢。
DEVICEQUERY:
Device 0: "GeForce GTX 570"
CUDA Driver Version / Runtime Version 6.0 / 5.5
CUDA Capability Major/Minor version number: 2.0
Makefile:nvcc -arch = sm_20 cuda_test.cu -o cuda_test
in cuda_test.cu:
#include <stdio.h> // printf, scanf, NULL etc.
#include <stdlib.h> // malloc, free, rand etc.
#define N (3) //Number of threads we are using (also, length of array declared in main)
#define THREADS_PER_BLOCK (1) //Threads per block we are using
#define N_BLOCKS (N/THREADS_PER_BLOCK)
/* Function to generate a random integer between 1-10 */
void random_ints (int *a, int n)
{
int i;
srand(time(NULL)); //Seed rand() with current time
for(i=0; i<n; i++)
{
a[i] = rand()%10 + 1;
}
return;
}
/* Kernel that adds two integers a & b, stores result in c */
__global__ void add(int *a, int *b, int *c) {
//global indicates function that runs on
//device (GPU) and is called from host (CPU) code
int index = threadIdx.x + blockIdx.x * blockDim.x;
//threadIdx.x : thread index
//blockIdx.x : block index
//blockDim.x : threads per block
//hence index is a thread counter across all blocks
c[index] = a[index] + b[index];
//note that pointers are used for variables
//add() runs on device, so they must point to device memory
//need to allocate memory on GPU
}
/* Kernel for dot product */
__global__ void dot(int *a, int *b, int *c)
{
__shared__ int product[THREADS_PER_BLOCK]; //All threads in a block must be able
//to access this array
int index = threadIdx.x + blockIdx.x * blockDim.x; //index
product[threadIdx.x] = a[index] * b[index]; //result of elementwise
//multiplication goes into product
//Make sure every thread has finished
__syncthreads();
//Sum the elements serially to obtain dot product
if( 0 == threadIdx.x ) //Pick one thread to sum, otherwise all will execute
{
int sum = 0;
for(int j=0; j < THREADS_PER_BLOCK; j++) sum += product[j];
//Done!
atomicAdd(c,sum);
}
}
int main(void)
{
int *a, *b, *c, *dotProduct; //host copies of a,b,c etc
int *d_a, *d_b, *d_c, *d_dotProduct; //device copies of a,b,c etc
int size = N * sizeof(int); //size of memory that needs to be allocated
int i=0; //iterator
//Allocate space for device copies of a,b,c
cudaMalloc((void **)&d_a, size);
cudaMalloc((void **)&d_b, size);
cudaMalloc((void **)&d_c, size);
//Setup input values
a = (int *)malloc(size); random_ints(a,N);
b = (int *)malloc(size); random_ints(b,N);
c = (int *)malloc(size);
//Copy inputs to device
cudaMemcpy(d_a, a, size, cudaMemcpyHostToDevice);
cudaMemcpy(d_b, b, size, cudaMemcpyHostToDevice);
//Launch add() kernel on GPU
add<<<N_BLOCKS,THREADS_PER_BLOCK>>>(d_a, d_b, d_c);
// triple angle brackets mark call from host to device
// this is also known as a kernel launch
// N/THREADS_PER_BLOCK = NO. OF BLOCKS
//Copy result back to host
cudaMemcpy(c, d_c, size, cudaMemcpyDeviceToHost);
//Output results
printf("a = {");
for (i=0; i<N; i++) printf(" %d",a[i]);
printf(" }\n");
printf("b = {");
for (i=0; i<N; i++) printf(" %d",b[i]);
printf(" }\n");
printf("c = {");
for (i=0; i<N; i++) printf(" %d",c[i]);
printf(" }\n");
//Calculate dot product of a & b
dotProduct = (int *)malloc(sizeof(int)); //Allocate host memory to dotProduct
*dotProduct = 0; //initialise to zero
cudaMalloc((void **)&d_dotProduct, sizeof(int)); //Allocate device memory to d_dotProduct
dot<<<N_BLOCKS,THREADS_PER_BLOCK>>>(d_a, d_b, d_dotProduct); //Perform calculation
cudaMemcpy(dotProduct, d_dotProduct, sizeof(int), cudaMemcpyDeviceToHost); //Copy result into dotProduct
printf("\ndot(a,b) = %d\n", *dotProduct); //Output result
//Cleanup
free(a); free(b); free(c); free(dotProduct);
cudaFree(d_a); cudaFree(d_b); cudaFree(d_c); cudaFree(d_dotProduct);
return 0;
} //End of main
答案 0 :(得分:2)
正如talonmies所说,请使其成为其他人可以运行您的代码。嵌入行号是无益的。
没有其他信息的最佳猜测是您尚未将d_dotProduct
初始化为零。您可以使用cudaMemset()
执行此操作 - 如果您想要一个不同的初始值,那么您可以cudaMemcpy()
来自主机的初始值或启动一个单独的内核来初始化,但在这种情况下cudaMemset()
(等于主机上的memset()
就足够了。
也可能N_BLOCKS*THREADS_PER_BLOCK
不等于size
。
关于您的第二个问题,product
是一个大小为THREADS_PER_BLOCK
的每个块数组,如果您使用product[index]
访问它,那么您将超出范围。
答案 1 :(得分:-2)
/* Kernel for dot product */
__global__ void dot(int *a, int *b, int *c)
{
__shared__ int product[THREADS_PER_BLOCK]; //All threads in a block must be able
//to access this array
int index = threadIdx.x + blockIdx.x * blockDim.x; //index
product[threadIdx.x] = a[index] * b[index]; //result of elementwise
//multiplication goes into product
if(index==0) *c = 0; //Ask one thread to set c to zero.
//Make sure every thread has finished
__syncthreads();
//Sum the elements serially to obtain dot product
if( 0 == threadIdx.x ) //Every block to do c += sum
{
int sum = 0;
for(int j=0; j < THREADS_PER_BLOCK; j++) sum += product[j];
//Done!
atomicAdd(c,sum);
}
}