基于stackoverflow中位于here的类似示例, 我有三个命名管道,pipe_a,pipe_b和pipe_c,它们是从外部进程提供的。我希望有一个读取器进程输出到控制台,无论写入任何这些管道。
下面的程序是一个一体化的c程序,它应该以非阻塞方式读取三个管道,并在任何一个管道获取新数据时显示输出。
然而,它不起作用 - 它是阻止的!如果pipe_a获取数据,它将显示它,然后等待新数据到达pipe_b等...
select()应该允许监视多个文件描述符,直到一个准备就绪,此时我们应该放入管道的读取函数并获取数据。
任何人都可以帮助确定管道在阻塞模式下的行为吗?
/*
* FIFO example using select.
*
* $ mkfifo /tmp/fifo
* $ clang -Wall -o test ./test.c
* $ ./test &
* $ echo 'hello' > /tmp/fifo
* $ echo 'hello world' > /tmp/fifo
* $ killall test
*/
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/select.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>
// globals
int fd_a, fd_b, fd_c;
int nfd_a, nfd_b, nfd_c;
fd_set set_a, set_b, set_c;
char buffer_a[100*1024];
char buffer_b[100*1024];
char buffer_c[100*1024];
int readPipeA()
{
ssize_t bytes;
size_t total_bytes;
if (FD_ISSET(fd_a, &set_a)) {
printf("\nDescriptor %d has new data to read.\n", fd_a);
total_bytes = 0;
for (;;) {
printf("\nDropped into read loop\n");
bytes = read(fd_a, buffer_a, sizeof(buffer_a));
if (bytes > 0) {
total_bytes += (size_t)bytes;
printf("%s", buffer_a);
} else {
if (errno == EWOULDBLOCK) {
printf("\ndone reading (%ul bytes)\n", total_bytes);
break;
} else {
perror("read");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
}
}
}
}
int readPipeB()
{
ssize_t bytes;
size_t total_bytes;
if (FD_ISSET(fd_b, &set_b)) {
printf("\nDescriptor %d has new data to read.\n", fd_b);
total_bytes = 0;
for (;;) {
printf("\nDropped into read loop\n");
bytes = read(fd_b, buffer_b, sizeof(buffer_b));
if (bytes > 0) {
total_bytes += (size_t)bytes;
printf("%s", buffer_b);
} else {
if (errno == EWOULDBLOCK) {
printf("\ndone reading (%ul bytes)\n", total_bytes);
break;
} else {
perror("read");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
}
}
}
}
int readPipeC()
{
ssize_t bytes;
size_t total_bytes;
if (FD_ISSET(fd_c, &set_c)) {
printf("\nDescriptor %d has new data to read.\n", fd_c);
total_bytes = 0;
for (;;) {
printf("\nDropped into read loop\n");
bytes = read(fd_c, buffer_c, sizeof(buffer_c));
if (bytes > 0) {
total_bytes += (size_t)bytes;
printf("%s", buffer_c);
} else {
if (errno == EWOULDBLOCK) {
printf("\ndone reading (%ul bytes)\n", total_bytes);
break;
} else {
perror("read");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
}
}
}
}
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
// create pipes to monitor (if they don't already exist)
system("mkfifo /tmp/PIPE_A");
system("mkfifo /tmp/PIPE_B");
system("mkfifo /tmp/PIPE_C");
// open file descriptors of named pipes to watch
fd_a = open("/tmp/PIPE_A", O_RDWR | O_NONBLOCK);
if (fd_a == -1) {
perror("open");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
FD_ZERO(&set_a);
FD_SET(fd_a, &set_a);
fd_b = open("/tmp/PIPE_B", O_RDWR | O_NONBLOCK);
if (fd_b == -1) {
perror("open");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
FD_ZERO(&set_b);
FD_SET(fd_b, &set_b);
fd_c = open("/tmp/PIPE_C", O_RDWR | O_NONBLOCK);
if (fd_c == -1) {
perror("open");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
FD_ZERO(&set_c);
FD_SET(fd_c, &set_c);
for(;;)
{
// check pipe A
nfd_a= select(fd_a+1, &set_a, NULL, NULL, NULL);
if (nfd_a) {
if (nfd_a == -1) {
perror("select");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
readPipeA();
}
// check pipe B
nfd_b= select(fd_b+1, &set_b, NULL, NULL, NULL);
if (nfd_b) {
if (nfd_b == -1) {
perror("select");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
readPipeB();
}
// check pipe C
nfd_c= select(fd_c+1, &set_c, NULL, NULL, NULL);
if (nfd_c) {
if (nfd_c == -1) {
perror("select");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
readPipeC();
}
}
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
---更新了代码---
根据这里的反馈修改了应用程序,还有一些阅读:
/*
* FIFO example using select.
*
* $ mkfifo /tmp/fifo
* $ clang -Wall -o test ./test.c
* $ ./test &
* $ echo 'hello' > /tmp/fifo
* $ echo 'hello world' > /tmp/fifo
* $ killall test
*/
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/select.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>
int readPipe(int fd)
{
ssize_t bytes;
size_t total_bytes = 0;
char buffer[100*1024];
printf("\nDropped into read pipe\n");
for(;;) {
bytes = read(fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer));
if (bytes > 0) {
total_bytes += (size_t)bytes;
printf("%s", buffer);
} else {
if (errno == EWOULDBLOCK) {
printf("\ndone reading (%d bytes)\n", (int)total_bytes);
break;
} else {
perror("read");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
}
}
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
int fd_a, fd_b, fd_c; // file descriptors for each pipe
int nfd; // select() return value
fd_set read_fds; // file descriptor read flags
struct timeval tv;
tv.tv_sec = 0;
tv.tv_usec = 0;
// create pipes to monitor (if they don't already exist)
system("mkfifo /tmp/PIPE_A");
system("mkfifo /tmp/PIPE_B");
system("mkfifo /tmp/PIPE_C");
// open file descriptors of named pipes to watch
fd_a = open("/tmp/PIPE_A", O_RDWR | O_NONBLOCK);
if (fd_a == -1) {
perror("open");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
fd_b = open("/tmp/PIPE_B", O_RDWR | O_NONBLOCK);
if (fd_b == -1) {
perror("open");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
fd_c = open("/tmp/PIPE_C", O_RDWR | O_NONBLOCK);
if (fd_c == -1) {
perror("open");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
FD_ZERO(&read_fds);
FD_SET(fd_a, &read_fds); // add pipe to the read descriptor watch list
FD_SET(fd_b, &read_fds);
FD_SET(fd_c, &read_fds);
for(;;)
{
// check if there is new data in any of the pipes
nfd = select(fd_a+1, &read_fds, NULL, NULL, &tv);
if (nfd != 0) {
if (nfd == -1) {
perror("select");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
if (FD_ISSET(fd_a, &read_fds)) {
readPipe(fd_a);
}
}
nfd = select(fd_b+1, &read_fds, NULL, NULL, &tv);
if (nfd != 0) {
if (nfd == -1) {
perror("select");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
if (FD_ISSET(fd_b, &read_fds)){
readPipe(fd_b);
}
}
nfd = select(fd_c+1, &read_fds, NULL, NULL, &tv);
if (nfd != 0) {
if (nfd == -1) {
perror("select");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
if (FD_ISSET(fd_c, &read_fds)){
readPipe(fd_c);
}
}
usleep(10);
}
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
当在任何一个观察的管道中有数据等待时,选择返回零(0)仍有问题吗?我一定不能正确使用select()和fd_isset()。你能看出我做错了什么吗?感谢。
答案 0 :(得分:2)
问题是select函数是阻塞的。我理解select()来检查标志,看看如果执行了读取“将”阻止,以便可以决定是否执行读取。管道正在RDWR和NONBLOCK模式下打开。
你说的问题是 select 功能正在阻塞,但继续承认NONBLOCK
标志只是为了让读块。选择和阅读是两回事。
O_NONBLOCK
标志会影响套接字(以及您的read
次呼叫); not 改变了select
的行为,它有自己的超时/阻塞语义。
man select
声明两个数字成员都设置为零的timeout
参数会产生非阻塞轮询,而超时参数NULL
可能会导致无限期阻塞:
如果 timeout 参数是空指针,则对 pselect()或 select()的调用将无限期地阻塞,直至至少为止一个描述符符合指定的标准。要进行轮询, timeout 参数不应为空指针,并且应指向零值
timespectimeval < / strong>结构。
(NB。页面上方的文字表明,虽然pselect()
采用timespec
结构,select()
采用timeval
结构;我已采取将这种逻辑应用于上述引文的自由。)
因此,在每个select
调用构建timeval
之前,将其成员设置为零,并将其传递给select
。
有几个笔记,我们在这里:
理想情况下,您只需要进行一次 select
调用,一次检查所有三个文件描述符,然后通过检查FD确定哪些管道到read
设置为fd_isset
;
我还建议在你的循环体末端添加一点usleep
,否则你的程序会在缺乏数据的情况下真正快速地旋转。
答案 1 :(得分:0)
这是我阅读三个命名管道的工作解决方案。它可以通过几种方式进行优化,但正如其编写的那样,对于需要这样做的其他人来说应该非常清楚:
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/select.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>
int readPipe(int fd)
{
ssize_t bytes;
size_t total_bytes = 0;
char buffer[100*1024];
printf("\nReading pipe descriptor # %d\n",fd);
for(;;) {
bytes = read(fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer));
if (bytes > 0) {
total_bytes += (size_t)bytes;
printf("%s", buffer);
} else {
if (errno == EWOULDBLOCK) {
break;
} else {
perror("read error");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
}
}
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
int fd_a, fd_b, fd_c; // file descriptors for each pipe
int nfd; // select() return value
fd_set read_fds; // file descriptor read flags
struct timeval tv;
tv.tv_sec = 0;
tv.tv_usec = 0;
// create pipes to monitor (if they don't already exist)
system("mkfifo /tmp/PIPE_A");
system("mkfifo /tmp/PIPE_B");
system("mkfifo /tmp/PIPE_C");
// open file descriptors of named pipes to watch
fd_a = open("/tmp/PIPE_A", O_RDWR | O_NONBLOCK);
if (fd_a == -1) {
perror("open error");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
fd_b = open("/tmp/PIPE_B", O_RDWR | O_NONBLOCK);
if (fd_b == -1) {
perror("open error");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
fd_c = open("/tmp/PIPE_C", O_RDWR | O_NONBLOCK);
if (fd_c == -1) {
perror("open error");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
for(;;)
{
// clear fds read flags
FD_ZERO(&read_fds);
// check if there is new data in any of the pipes
// PIPE_A
FD_SET(fd_a, &read_fds);
nfd = select(fd_a+1, &read_fds, NULL, NULL, &tv);
if (nfd != 0) {
if (nfd == -1) {
perror("select error");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
if (FD_ISSET(fd_a, &read_fds)) {
readPipe(fd_a);
}
}
// PIPE_B
FD_SET(fd_b, &read_fds);
nfd = select(fd_b+1, &read_fds, NULL, NULL, &tv);
if (nfd != 0) {
if (nfd == -1) {
perror("select error");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
if (FD_ISSET(fd_b, &read_fds)){
readPipe(fd_b);
}
}
// PIPE_C
FD_SET(fd_c, &read_fds);
nfd = select(fd_c+1, &read_fds, NULL, NULL, &tv);
if (nfd != 0) {
if (nfd == -1) {
perror("select error");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
if (FD_ISSET(fd_c, &read_fds)){
readPipe(fd_c);
}
}
usleep(100000);
}
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
答案 2 :(得分:0)
只是为了让您的代码更简单。你不需要三个选择。您可以设置所有免费文件描述符,其中包含三个调用FD_SET()
,调用select,if nfd > 0
检查每个fd_x with FD_ISSET()
。
答案 3 :(得分:0)
我拿了一个用于套接字编程的代码片段,但对于命名管道它应该是一样的。它应该简单易懂。
#include <cstdio>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <cstring>
#include <cctype>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
#include <sys/select.h>
int main()
{
fd_set readSet, writeSet, exSet;
struct timeval tv;
int i;
int fifoFds[3];
//open files or named pipes and put them into fifoFds array
while(1)
{
FD_ZERO(&readSet);
FD_ZERO(&writeSet); //not used
FD_ZERO(&exSet); //not used
int maxfd = -1;
for(i = 0; i < 3; i++)
{
if(maxfd == -1 || fifoFds[i] > maxfd)
maxfd = fifoFds[i];
FD_SET(fifoFds[i], &readSet);
}
tv.tv_sec = 1; //wait 1 second in select, change these as needed
tv.tv_usec = 0; //this is microseconds
select(maxfd+1, &readSet, &writeSet, &exSet, &tv);
for(i = 0; i < 3; i++)
{
if(FD_ISSET(fifoFds[i], &readSet))
{
//Read from that fifo now!
}
}
}
return 0;
}