我正在使用递归来获取列表的排列。这是我写的,但yield
版本不起作用:
def test_permutation_rec():
print "test 2"
permutation_rec2([1,2,3],[])
print "test 1"
for one in permutation_rec1([1,2,3],[]):
print "one:",one
def permutation_rec1(onelist,prelist):
if onelist == [] :
print prelist
yield prelist
lenlist= len(onelist)
for i, oneitem in enumerate(onelist) :
leftlist = [onelist[j] for j in range(0,lenlist) if j != i]
permutation_rec1(leftlist,prelist + [oneitem])
def permutation_rec2(onelist,prelist):
if onelist == [] :
print prelist
lenlist= len(onelist)
for i, oneitem in enumerate(onelist) :
leftlist = [onelist[j] for j in range(0,lenlist) if j != i]
permutation_rec2(leftlist,prelist + [oneitem])
if __name__ == "__main__":
test_permutation_rec()
结果:
test 2
[1, 2, 3]
[1, 3, 2]
[2, 1, 3]
[2, 3, 1]
[3, 1, 2]
[3, 2, 1]
test 1
我认为我在this the answer中使用了yield
。
有谁可以告诉我为什么yield
没有生效?
顺便说一句,leftlist = [onelist[j] for j in range(0,lenlist) if j != i]
在permutation_rec2
,我认为是丑陋的。当列表很大时,它会创建许多临时列表。我怎样才能改善这一点?
答案 0 :(得分:6)
你需要传递递归调用的结果;每个调用返回一个生成器,你必须迭代它。您链接的答案肯定会循环遍历递归调用。
在for
上添加permutation_rec1()
循环,并将每个结果值输出到下一个调用者:
def permutation_rec1(onelist, prelist):
if not onelist:
yield prelist
lenlist = len(onelist)
for i, oneitem in enumerate(onelist):
leftlist = [onelist[j] for j in range(lenlist) if j != i]
for res in permutation_rec1(leftlist, prelist + [oneitem]):
yield res
如果您使用的是Python 3.3或更高版本,则可以使用新的yield from
generator delegation syntax:
def permutation_rec1(onelist,prelist):
if not onelist:
yield prelist
lenlist = len(onelist)
for i, oneitem in enumerate(onelist):
leftlist = [onelist[j] for j in range(lenlist) if j != i]
yield from permutation_rec1(leftlist, prelist + [oneitem])