我正在为pascal的子集创建一个词法分析器,这是一个在编译器红龙教科书背面推荐的编程项目。我正在努力将语法更改为LL,以便我可以创建解析表。我忽略了悬崖的其他歧义,并认为这是唯一存在的歧义。我刚刚删除了所有的epsilon作品。在我继续左分解之前,我想要一些关于我是否正确删除了epsilon产品的反馈。我已经盯着这一段很长一段时间了,所以我真的不确定我是否错过了以后会引起问题的事情,而且没有人可以反对它。我知道这是一个很长的帖子,我真的不知道还有哪些地方可以让有人知道这个。我非常感谢你的时间!
原始语法:
<statement> →
if <expression> then <statement>
<factor> → id
<program> →
<program> id (<identifier_list>);
<declarations>
<subprogram_declarations>
<compound_statement>
.
<identifier_list> →
id
| <identifier_list>, id
<declarations> →
<declarations> var id : <type>;
|E
<type> →
<standard_type>
|array[num..num] of <standard_type>
<standard type> →
integer
| real
<subprogram_declarations> →
<subprogram_declarations> <subprogram_declaration>;
|E
<subprogram_declaration> →
<subprogram_head declarations>
<subprogram_declarations>
<compound_statement>
<subprogram_head> →
function id <arguments> : <standard_type>;
<arguments> →
(<parameter_list>)
| E
<parameter_list> →
id : <type>
| <parameter_list>; id : <type>
<compound statement> →
begin
<optional_statements>
end
<optional_statements> →
<statement_list>
| E
<statement_list> →
<statement>
|<statement_list>; <statement>
<statement> →
<variable> assignop <expression>
| <procedure_statement>
| <compound_statement>
| if <expression then statement> else <statement>
| while <expression> do <statement>
| if <expression> then <statement>
<variable> →
id
| id [<expression> ]
<expression_list> →
<expression>
|<expression_list> , <expression>
<expression> →
<simple_expression>
| <simple_expression> relop <simple_expression>
<simple_expression> →
<term>
| sign <term>
| <simple_expression> addop <term>
<term> →
<factor>
| <term> mulop <factor>
<factor> →
id
| id (<expression_list>)
| num
| (<expression>)
| not <factor>
| id [<expression>]
<sign> →
+ | -
语法后消除epsilon
<statement> →
if <expression> then <statement>
<factor> → id
<program> →
<program><id (<identifier_list>);
<declarations>
<subprogram_declarations>
.
|<program> id (<identifier_list>);
<subprogram_declarations>
.
|<program>id (<identifier_list>);
<declarations>
.
|<program> id (<identifier_list>);
.
|<program><id (<identifier_list>);
<declarations>
<subprogram_declarations>
begin
<statement_list>
end
.
|<program> id (<identifier_list>);
<subprogram_declarations>
begin
<statement_list>
end
.
|<program>id (<identifier_list>);
<declarations>
begin
<statement_list>
end
.
|<program> id (<identifier_list>);
begin
<statement_list>
end
.
<identifier_list> →
id
| <identifier_list>, id
<declarations> →
<declarations> var id : <type>;
<type> →
<standard_type>
|array[num..num] of standard_type
<standard type> →
<integer>
| <real>
<subprogram_declarations> →
<subprogram_declarations> <subprogram_declaration>;
<subprogram_declaration> →
<subprogram_head> <declarations>
<subprogram_declarations >
begin
<statement_list>
end
|<subprogram_head>
<subprogram_declarations >
begin
<statement_list>
end
|<subprogram_head> <declarations>
begin
<statement_list>
end
|<subprogram_head>
begin
<statement_list>
end
|<subprogram_head> <declarations>
<subprogram_declarations >
|<subprogram_head>
<subprogram_declarations >
|<subprogram_head> <declarations>
|<subprogram_head>
<subprogram_head> →
function id (<parameter_list>) : <standard_type>;
|function id : <standard_type>;
<parameter_list> →
id : <type>
|<parameter_list>; id : <type>
<statement_list> →
<statement>
|<statement_list>;< statement>
<statement> →
<variable> assignop <expression>
| <procedure_statement>
| <compound_statement>
| if <expression> then <statement> else <statement>
| while <expression> do <statement>
| if <expression> then <statement>
<variable> →
id
|id [<expression>]
<expression_list> →
<expression>
|<expression_list> , <expression>
<expression> →
<simple_expression>
| <simple_expression> relop <simple_expression>
<simple_expression> →
<term>
| <sign> <term>
| <simple_expression> addop <term>
<term> →
<factor>
| <term> mulop <factor>
<factor> →
id
| id (<expression_list>)
| num
| (<expression>)
| not <factor>
| id [<expression>]
<sign> →
+ | -
第二种语法当然是显着不同的。我通过查找对它的引用并创建一个|来删除所有epsilon产品有和没有它的选项。当删除epsilon只留下生产中的一行时,我完全删除了该生产并将该行移动到之前调用生产的位置。例如,我通过改变:
完全消除了这种方式 <subprogram_head> →
function id <arguments> : <standard_type>;
<arguments> →
(<parameter_list>)
| E
到
<subprogram_head> →
function id (<parameter_list>) : <standard_type>;
|function id : <standard_type>;